It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יב,א גמרא

Perhaps No. She Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna except ??? So if he wished, ??? them ??? you shall Responded and he will see for him ??? for him for his own sake ??? But here, in this case, No. and Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except As it is written (Lev. 23) No. ??? No. ??? to him ??? But here, in this case, No. ??? This No. ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? on ??? that did not have ??? It is possible ??? to say to a slave One who acts with me" Really? ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? "Go!" It once happened ??? regarding a woman for he said: to it ??? It once happened ??? a woman why is it that No. a woman that it was not the case that ??? a slave also that it was not the case that ??? No. ??? for what ??? Come and hear: a slave ??? yes. his rabbi; he is liable ??? and not only this, but ??? his hands for his master Learn from this It is possible ??? to say to a slave One who acts with me" Really? ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? for he said: to him "Go!" It once happened ??? If so, It once happened his hands why is it that for his master ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? immediately and so when he does not have No. he will give for him For it has also No. ??? of him Come and learn from this. and What is the difference ??? For it might have entered your mind that I would say: (Deut. 4) ??? does he act? for him ??? Come and learn from this. Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, but: a woman ??? he is liable ??? from this general principle it would follow that is not he said to it For if it was he said to it ??? why is it that he is liable ??? that is not he said to it But the beginning of the teaching, also that is not He said to him: In reality lit: In the world for he said: for him and the woman that it was not the case that ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, and if he said to it ??? It once happened ??? permission from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching that is not he said to it This is what he means: and if ??? and he said to it ??? It once happened ??? permission ??? what is there to say? What would you have said? (Ps. 45) all ??? the daughter of a king ??? Come and learn from this. Let us say, ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says It is possible ??? to say for his master with two ??? or ??? or ??? But the sages say: freedom in the hand of his rabbi; Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned It is possible and one master reasons that It is impossible ??? This or ??? or ??? or ??? or give for me It once happened the hands of ??? should bring himself And furthermore, what is the difference here, with two ??? except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? for he said: to him "Go!" It once happened ??? and with two ??? No. doubt whether Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned or ??? or ??? so that thus it will be ??? for me ??? by the And the rabbbis reason that one ??? the stones of ??? also ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rav ??? the hands of his male slave that specific ??? and eats makes ??? Learn from this It is possible ??? to say to a slave One who acts with me" Really? ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? to him food ??? for what

דף יב,ב גמרא

??? and eats ??? and let us say, for him that which was sanctified for Temple use until now ??? to you without ??? and now also ??? to you without ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? it's settled. ??? so that thus it will be ??? makes ??? that came first that came first made kiddush, for him in less less than ??? Here, too, ??? for he said: Rav ??? the hands of his male slave that specific ??? makes and eats For if it was No. ??? one ??? for him If you say, This is satisfactory ??? and It is impossible Hey, isn't it the case that ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? It is possible For if it was No. ??? one ??? for him one who seeks ??? except Is this not Learn from this It is impossible Learn from this Come and hear: for he said: R' Yochanan ??? a hand his male slave of his fellow he gives ??? for his master that specific ??? from ??? Learn from this It is possible ??? to say to a slave One who acts with me" Really? ??? Here in this case, in what way ??? to him food If so, why is it that ??? from ??? If so, ??? should bring himself except Is this not Learn from this It is possible Learn from this Mar said: he gives ??? for his master ??? This is obvious! ??? for him ??? that are his She who seeks ??? of him. it is not necessary to teach this ??? his male slave for him ??? What would you have said? ??? that are his he Come and learn from this. It was taught: R' Elazar said ??? to him ??? Is it not the case that ??? he to a slave who goes out ??? the hands of his rabbi; ??? he said to us obligation he to him ??? he was a slave a priest ??? from ??? to him Is it not the case that Just as if ??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not ??? permission he said to us for just as Watch out for leading vav !! And even a slave a priest ??? a priest ??? on ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not the case that they eat from terumah and this he does not he eats but: a woman obligation he to it which provides ??? from ??? from ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him And what does it mean when it says ??? he turned them This is what he means: them ??? on ??? Just as ??? on ??? And so ??? If it was he is required he could sprinkle for him ??? for him ??? for him ??? and it comes ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.