It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

??? benefit that he came ??? for him between ??? that is old to the lender ??? He said to him ??? Master, the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Except I can object with text from here: For example, Behold! of the academy of son of ??? So, here, that is not ??? And if you say So, here, If so, ??? except Mar Zutra said: Behold! three words The rabbis established ??? without The reason is one this one And the other one for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said the writing all ??? No. it was made except ??? And the other one for he said: Rav ??? a woman for his son The greatness in the house of ??? He said to him Rav for Rav, ??? for me ??? to you that is not ??? among from this general principle it would follow So if he wished, he returns of him. ??? he returns of him. This is what he means: items ??? No. ??? this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav one ??? For Rav Huna said: Rav said a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? to him ??? he bought If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? gifts is greater than but: gifts ??? No. that in his face, should request ??? that He performs ??? together ??? regarding one from them they said to him ??? the land in the presence of ??? the land and he bought of him ??? He went a slave ??? between ??? for his own sake No. ??? and not something he came in front of Rav ??? He said to him What then does it mean when it says ??? to you one For Rav Huna said: Rav said And furthermore, this one ??? Raba said to him because This who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: He said to him If so, ??? he and all ??? he returns it was said: walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? that I he is liable to him Rav said he is liable ??? and if came ??? he does not return And Shmuel said from the midst of ??? if came ??? he returns Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned walks ??? he is equivalent. and one master reasons that walks Is this not ??? he is equivalent. No. ??? walks ??? he is equivalent. and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about ??? we do not say ??? say ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? that I he is liable to him give a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? that I he is liable to him walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? in which there is to him ??? give a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? in which there is to him ??? he is liable ??? and if came ??? he does not return ??? Let us say, for him yes. ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of after R' Zayra said: ??? Rav Sheishet it was. for him ??? He said to him According to Rav Yosef son of Chama ??? He went ??? for him they said to him ??? He said to them yes. ??? them For he came ??? He said to him: then the ruling is acceptable. ??? that is not ??? your soul (Prov. 22) a slave ??? other than this then the ruling is acceptable. ??? a slave ??? R' my brother ??? it was. for him ??? in Nehardaya

דף יד,ב גמרא

He said to them to R' ??? to R' ??? son of ??? they said them ??? they said them they do not say them ??? R' ??? He said to them yes. R' Yosi son of ??? He said to them No. are they, ??? for him He said to him Look, Master, in what way does ??? does he act? He said to them of high quality ??? for him For they came ??? He said to him Look, Master, No. ??? that is not ??? except He said to them also of high quality ??? for him He said to him why is it that ??? thus He said to him those particular people there are. cubits ??? cubits ??? ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and capital punishment Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? ??? who he gave ??? Abba son of ??? He said to him people ??? there are. He said to him there are. there is regarding them ??? He said to him there are. He said to him If so, then the ruling is acceptable. ??? walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? he has walked and they sought and they did not find One teaching ??? And another teaching ??? who ??? to him Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned walks ??? walks Is this not ??? he said R' Abba -- son of ??? walks Is this not ??? And there is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? Rav ??? he said this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one ??? in the hour of the giving of coins this one ??? in the hour of the giving of coins Rav Papa said, this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one ??? he accepts ??? he gives this one ??? he gives ??? he accepts Let us say, walks ??? She as it is taught: walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? he has walked and they sought and they did not find ??? did he die ??? R' he gave and R' Ya'akov And they said ??? and there are those who say ??? who ??? to him R' Yehudah ??? he said It is because of this: R' Ya'akov who said it in the name of ??? a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead but the sages say they shall divide here, And they said all Just as ??? may he do it? Thus said Rabbi Shimon ??? by way of lit., through the hands of he was It once happened And they said ??? Is this not In this case, what they disagree about of the first tanna? reasoned walks Is this not ??? and R' he gave and R' Ya'akov also walks Is this not ??? and even though ??? we do not say a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead and there are those who say walks ??? R' Yehudah ??? he said It is because of this: R' Ya'akov who said it in the name of R' Meir walks Is this not ??? in a case ??? say a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead But the sages say: they shall divide from doubt them here, And they said ??? is preferable and Rabbi Shimon ??? It once happened he came ??? No. ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? For R' ??? And the rabbbis what they disagree about For it was taught in a baraita ??? on his mouth R' Elazar says one ??? and one ??? items of movable property in which they have liens on ??? By means of money and with a contract and with a "chazakah" show of strength and those that do not to them liens on yes. ??? except ??? But the sages say: both these and these: ??? They said to him: It once happened ??? of My son, ??? an ill person and he said ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.