It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

??? but it with the passage of the requisite number of years ten a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? the sages ??? He said to them: My son, ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna ??? and R' he gave and R' Ya'akov also ??? even though ??? we do not say a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead and there are those who say ??? And R' Yehudah ??? who said it in the name of ??? in a case ??? say a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead and the sages ??? they shall divide from doubt them here, And they said ??? is preferable and Rabbi Shimon ??? It once happened he came ??? them Rabbi Shimon ??? he or in the name ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Come and hear: for he said: Rav Yosef Watch out for leading vav the halacha is like Rabbi Shimon ??? to you ??? he or for he says in the name ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yosef said Watch out for leading vav the halacha is like Rabbi Shimon ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? these are the words of ??? Rav Yosef ??? to it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? a commandment to establish these are the words of the dead It was taught by ???

דף טו,א משנה

??? writ ??? the sea and he said before ??? but not before ??? before ??? but not before ??? before ??? all of it before ??? before ??? before ??? all of it is invalid, one says before ??? and one says before ??? is invalid, two say ??? and one says before ??? is invalid, And R' Yehudah considers it proper one says before ??? and two say ??? is value

דף טו,א גמרא

this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, Why do I need But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere one ??? writ ??? the sea It is necessary for him ??? before ??? before ??? If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: It is necessary for him and if did not say is valid ??? before ??? before ??? all of it ??? Which ??? For didn't ??? say even it is not written: in it except ??? One ??? for the remainder it is not necessary for him except Rav Ashi said ??? before ??? all of it before ??? Rav Chisdah said and even two ??? on ??? a hand two is invalid, What is the reason? or all of it ??? or all of it ??? the sages He disagreed with this Raba who that it is possible something For this he said one is valid now That there are two is invalid, except Rabba said: Even if

דף טו,ב גמרא

he and after acting as witnesses on ??? a hand two is invalid, What is the reason? they came ??? documents of the world ??? he departs ??? He disagreed with this Rav Ashi who that it is possible something For this ??? for him ??? is valid now That there are one ??? is invalid, except Rav Ashi said even says I he until two is invalid, What is the reason? or all of it ??? or all of it ??? the sages We have learnt in a Mishna: before ??? all of it before ??? is invalid, Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? How so? Shall I say ??? that he came ??? upon it A general principle: now one says before ??? and one says before ??? That this ??? "writing" and that one ??? the conclusion lit, the seal is invalid, ??? except or ??? or Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? and To exclude ??? Rav would say to you ??? before ??? but not before ??? Why do I need except No. -- this refers to Even -- this refers to The tanna teaches: Here in this case, also, No. -- this refers to Even -- this refers to The tanna teaches: Rav Chisdah said ??? five and a partition five yes. combine together until that it should be or all of it ??? or all of it ??? five and a partition Hashem combine together And the halacha is according to the opinion combine together he is required ??? or yes. ??? How so? Shall I say that he came ??? among two ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? we wash the hands to one And even if that two So rather, that he came washed one one his hand For it was taught in a mishna: ??? One ??? and one ??? his hands ??? So rather, that he came washed a fraction a fraction that are his ??? of the academy of R' ??? yes. ??? it is not necessary to teach this That there are ??? And so that it is possible ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall For it was taught in a mishna:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.