It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

??? he does not ??? No. ??? and not to taharah, it is not necessary to teach this That there are ??? Here, too, ??? Perhaps in the matter of ??? and it is Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita ??? in which there is in it forty ??? and they descend two ??? "At the same time," ??? "In the case of this one after that one," ??? tahor and the second tamei Rabbi Yehudah says if they were his feet of ??? in water Even the second tahor he said Rabbi ??? Behold! And they said that comes his head and the majority of his body in water ??? and tahor ??? on his head and on the majority of his body three ??? water ??? tamei he is required R' ??? What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rav Pappa said: Behold! And they said One who has had a seminal emission an ill person ??? upon it nine ??? water tahor he is required Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? one says before ??? and one says ??? Rav said Shmuel son of Yehudah Rabbi Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except that do not ??? he would exit ??? the hands of both but: writ he would exit ??? the hands of both

דף טז,ב גמרא

is valid Perhaps, his reasoning is two that they brought writ ??? the sea It is not necessary for them ??? Abaye said to him: Except I can object with text from here: at the end of the teaching, where he teaches two say ??? and one says before ??? is invalid, And Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper The reason is ??? he would exit ??? the hands of both this one writ he would exit ??? the hands of both ??? rabbis He said to him: yes. And so yes. writ he would exit ??? the hands of both in what way ??? one master reasons that ??? Perhaps We come to compare ??? documents of the world ??? one and one master reasons that No. ??? other than this Watch out for leading vav !! And there are those who say it was Rav said Shmuel son of Yehudah Rabbi Yochanan said: Even if writ he would exit ??? the hands of both is invalid, Perhaps, his reasoning is two that they brought writ ??? the sea they all require ??? Abaye said to him: Except I can object with text from here: at the end of the teaching, where he teaches two say ??? and one says before ??? is invalid, And R' Yehudah considers it proper even writ he would exit ??? the hands of both ??? rabbis He said to him: yes. in what way ??? one master reasons that on account of that do not ??? and one master reasons that on account of that do not witnesses ??? Let us say, of Rabbah and Raba ??? She No. Raba ??? that came first and Rava said to him: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world in the case of ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? after ??? lest he shall return ??? what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? also Rabbi Yehudah ??? this one was it said; He ascended Ulla said ??? he was Rabbi Yehudah Even in the first, He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Oshaya: ??? Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper ??? and not ??? Is this not ??? one says before ??? and one says before ??? No. ??? before ??? but not before ??? You might have thought that I would say that Because and not ??? Rabbi Yehudah ??? lest he shall return a thing ??? Perhaps will come ??? documents of the world ??? one also No. ??? Come and hear from this was it said; also Rav Yehudah said two that they brought writ ??? the sea we came ??? Rabbi Yehudah And the rabbbis Rabbah son of son of ??? was ill the yoke of ??? Rav Yehudah and Rabbah ??? of him. They asked of him two that they brought writ ??? the sea they all require ??? or It is not necessary for them He said to them: It is not necessary for them Just as Watch out for leading vav !! And even they shall say ??? who No. ??? he came This certain individual

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.