It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כ,א גמרא

If it was It is because of this: ??? for there is of it this one ??? (Deut. 24) "and the writing of to it ??? there is not in this case. And if you say ??? perhaps, ??? He gave for him ??? from the beginning this one in the case of he sleeps was his name and her name in that place ??? in that place ??? there is not in this case. and Rav Yosef; And what can we come and learn from this? that do not who ??? atop who ??? Rav Chisdah said writ ??? that did not have ??? upon it ??? we came ??? Rabbi Yehudah And the rabbbis as it is taught: Behold! that he was It is necessary for him to write the Name ??? to write Yehudah and he erred and not ??? in it ??? upon it ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: yes. the Name from ??? Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov perhaps, No. She Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna ??? (Ex. 15) this to me ??? there is not in this case. But here, in this case, Did not Rav Chisda say ??? writs of divorce of of the world he said ??? Raba What is the reason? Shall I say It is because of this: As it is written (Deut. 24) "and the writing of and here in this other case, ??? for him and perhaps, ??? for him rabbis So rather, It is because of this: As it is written and gave and here in this other case, No. he will give to it something Perhaps ??? writ She Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? on ??? benefit ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? on ??? benefit is valid Rav Ashi said Even We also ??? on raised up of olive tree perhaps, that I He ascended of olive tree ??? It was taught: Rabbi says ??? on ??? benefit is valid ??? Levi ??? in the name of Rabbi and not ??? in the name for many people ??? Perhaps, Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? The rabbis taught: "and the writing of and not ??? This comes to imply ??? Is this not "writing" She They challenged this from a baraita: a slave that went out in writing for upon regarding ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? but not in writing for upon regarding ??? Ulla said Rabbi Eliezer said There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? No. They challenged this from a baraita: No. he was ??? except ??? gold Hey, isn't it the case that ??? gold ??? there are. ??? gold and not ??? gold ??? gold ??? and not ??? gold For this there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: ??? a furrow or ??? He said to him: ??? a furrow ??? No. he was ??? except ??? gold and if You might have thought ??? a furrow

דף כ,ב גמרא

this one ??? there is not in this case. ??? gold and not ??? gold ??? gold ??? and not ??? gold For this there i.e., in another mishna ??? and here in this other case, ??? Raba brought this very question ??? the writing of to it writ on ??? of gold and he said to it ??? What then? He said to him: ??? her ketubah written contract ??? ??? The reason is That there are the remainder of Watch out for leading vav And that is absent here the remainder of No. it is the law even though ??? the remainder of But hey, come and learn from this. ??? That there are the remainder of If it was he said to it yes. If it was No. No. What is the reason? ??? he The Rabbis taught Behold! this ??? mine It is not ??? in order ??? for me ??? Behold! This is ??? he is required Rav ??? between ??? or whether ark ??? What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Is it not enough for him (Deut. 24) ??? one the Merciful One in the Torah says and not two and three books it is not necessary to teach this ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama they were ??? that he was are his and writ It is written on ??? Consider this case: he he would exit ??? What then? who say ??? to it or, perhaps, he ??? Rabba said: Is it not enough for him ??? that it is possible ??? he and to Raba it is a problem Our mishna on ??? of a slave This is satisfactory ??? to Raba There is no difficulty. ??? and Rabbi Eliezer She except ??? son of Chama it is a problem ??? son of Chama also There is no difficulty. ??? Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: Our mishna ??? also No. ??? What then do we do about it? Come and hear: for he said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama they were ??? that it of it and writ It is written upon it Consider this case: She ??? What then? who say ??? for him or, perhaps, ??? No. ??? Abayye said: Come and hear: Even he ??? on ??? a child that he was beside Jerusalem and it was the case that in it an elderly person one and it was the case that ??? for all My son, ??? written in writing ??? and others ??? came It once happened before the sages ??? But why? this one ??? (Jer. 32) ??? there is not in this case. except Is this not It is because of this: ??? them Rabba said: And what does it mean when it says ??? perhaps,

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.