It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א משנה

??? writ ??? from him they found ??? is valid And if not, is invalid, they found in a satchel???? or in a case??? if ??? is value

דף כז,א גמרא

They challenged this from a baraita: he found writs of divorce of women and writs of emancipation of slaves wills ??? presentations and marriage settlements ??? Behold! this He does not return for I say they were written but he had second thoughts about them that did not have ??? this statement that he said poses a contradiction: ??? And even if to invite is greater than Rabbah said There is no difficulty. here, in a place ??? here, in a place that do not ??? and even in a place ??? This is only in the case ??? two Joseph son of Shimon in the city One For if it was No. you say thus it is a problem of Rabbah ??? among judgement For Rav Huna and it was it is written of him. ??? Rav Huna said ??? for two ??? He said to him: Rav Chisda ??? of it ??? he is required to it ??? Rav Huna ??? For it was taught in a baraita all that were done by a court בית דין Behold! this he returns Hey, isn't it the case that among judgement For Rav Huna ??? he is equivalent. ??? he returns Perhaps, If it was ??? two Joseph son of Shimon in the city One yes. and if No. No. a slave Rabbah ??? among ??? that it is possible that they said ??? in a case ??? Even though it will be ??? that is not ??? and there are that they said ??? This is only in the case that did not have ??? Rabbi Zeira pointed out a contradiction. ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? writ ??? from him if they found ??? is valid And if not, is invalid, They challenged this from a baraita: he found a writ of a woman ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? give thanks he returns ??? yes. ??? give thanks He does not return No. to this and not to this this one

דף כז,ב גמרא

at a time i.e., in a case ??? give thanks Regardless, he returns ??? And even if to invite is greater than ??? here, in a place ??? here, in a place that do not ??? that it is possible that they said This is only in the case ??? he that is not ??? And this is like the position of Rabbah and there are that they said even though that is not ??? No. ??? and disagrees of Rabbah This is satisfactory of Rabbah did not say ??? Zeira ??? for him ??? except Rabbi Zeira What is the reason? did not say ??? He could say to you who The tanna teaches: if he said ??? and even to invite is greater than Perhaps if he said ??? Rabbi ??? he said For example, ??? witnesses Always, No. ??? except on writ one of Joseph son of Shimon If so, what is there to say? What would you have said? ??? Perhaps ??? lest ??? and witnesses ??? Come and learn from this. Rav Ashi said: For example, for he says ??? there are in it beside ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected a sign of ??? beside ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected a sign of ??? but: ??? in reality No. from doubt for him signs If it was a law established by the Torah If it was is a law established by the Rabbis Rabbah son of son of ??? for him ??? among ??? he said If it was the signs that we given? ??? for me ??? If it was ??? for me ??? he said No. ??? If it was It is because of this: the signs that we given? ??? and They reason ??? a law established by the Torah If it was It is because of this: ??? According to Rabbinic law, but: a person in reality ??? And if not, ??? The Rabbis taught Who is that did not have ??? Rabbi Natan says ??? so that ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says so that that it should be a person ??? that did not have he crossed in that place a person and there are those who say that did not have ??? a person in that place Rabbi says so that to write ??? Rabbi Isaac says so that for him to read it others say so that ??? and for him to read it And even if ??? and there are in it signs ??? upon it that they said ??? there are in it beside ??? And there is no meaning to the word acting as witnesses on ??? that they said ??? they found ??? in a purse ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.