It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

It is because of this: ??? of it rabbis This ??? he ??? he For if it was ??? for him two No. will come the master of ??? for him one will come the master of ??? for him immediately As Mar said: before how much ??? to it Rabbi Yochanan and R' Chaninah One says before two and one says before three from the beginning ??? and not will come ??? and to Raba for he said: on account of that do not witnesses ??? that two should request something ??? documents of the world until ??? faithfully ??? I will say ??? a single witness faithfully ??? For example, ??? doubt whether of milk doubt whether of ??? that is not ??? But here, in this case, ??? a man you shall a thing ??? And there is no meaning to the word a thing ??? less than ??? In justice, he ??? documents also No. that ??? should request for Resh Lakish said: witnesses ??? on ??? And the rabbbis he ??? and here in this other case, It is because of this: ??? of it rabbis This ??? he ??? he For if it was ??? for him two No. will come the master of ??? for him one will come the master of ??? for him immediately As Mar said: before how much ??? to it Rabbi Yochanan And Rabbi ??? One says before two and one says before three from the beginning ??? and not will come ??? and Raba What is the reason? did not say ??? He could say to you who The tanna teaches: before ??? before ??? and Rabbah In justice, he ??? thus except For if it was ??? for him ??? will come ??? now also will come ??? one ??? one ??? No. ??? and Rabbah What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say ??? He could say to you If so, ??? before ??? And naught else before ??? Why do I need Learn from this in the case of ??? and Raba In justice, he ??? thus except for if so, will come ??? documents of the world ??? one and Rabbah who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, before there i.e., in another mishna a woman No. ??? Here in this case, a woman ??? there i.e., in another mishna the master of a thing No. ??? Here in this case, the master of a thing ??? And Rabba said to you because Here in this case, For They said: ??? who No. ??? And because of the fact and so when They said: ??? will come ??? documents of the world ??? one ??? for he said: on account of that do not ??? one This a Tanna taught: who seeks "writing" ??? he is required

דף ג,ב גמרא

the conclusion lit, the seal ??? If it was Rabbi Meir the conclusion lit, the seal he is required "writing" it does not require For it was taught in a baraita yes. ??? that is connected to the earth ??? on ??? to the earth ??? and were given to it is valid If it was Rabbi Eliezer "writing" he is required the conclusion lit, the seal it does not require And if you say In reality lit: In the world Rabbi Eliezer She And so it does not require Rabbi Eliezer the conclusion lit, the seal ??? according to Torah law, According to Rabbinic law, he is required Hey, isn't it the case that three ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and it does not require Rabbi Eliezer the conclusion lit, the seal ??? For it was taught in a baraita three ??? and if ??? is valid the writing of in writing ??? And there is no meaning to the word upon it witnesses there are upon it witnesses And there is no meaning to the word in it time there are in it time And there is no meaning to the word in it except a single witness Behold! these three ??? and if ??? is valid Rabbi Eliezer says even though that do not upon it witnesses except ??? to it before witnesses is valid ??? that do not the witnesses ??? on ??? except because of ??? the world. So rather, Rabbi Meir She And so it does not require Rabbi Meir "writing" ??? according to Torah law, According to Rabbinic law, he is required for this statement that Rav said poses a contradiction: ??? says he was Rabbi Meir even they found in the dunghill

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.