It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

??? Rav Yosef said: even ??? Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said even ???

דף לב,א משנה

??? writ ??? and they come ??? or ??? after him: ??? and he said to him writ ??? to you wasted he Behold! this wasted ??? next to his wife or ??? and he said to it writ ??? to you wasted he Behold! this wasted if ??? writ ??? for the remainder It is impossible ??? in the first, would make a court בית דין from someplace else ??? he decreed Rabban Gamliel the elder that it shall not be doing thus because of ??? the world.

דף לב,א גמרא

??? No. The tanna teaches: except they come And even if ipso facto and we do not say ??? he that he came ??? or ??? after him: ??? Why do I need What would you have said? No. ??? Come and learn from this. Watch out for leading vav !! ??? he next to his wife why do I have What would you have said? For we do not say ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? certainly ??? Come and learn from this. or ??? why do I have What would you have said? ??? he that is not ??? with the intent ??? but: ??? that is not ??? for him For ??? certainly ??? Come and learn from this. if ??? writ ??? It is impossible ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this who searched upon it from the beginning ??? What would you have said? ??? a saying at the end of eating, before they leave ??? The Rabbis taught wasted he If it was ??? in it his words ??? is invalid, he he does not writ did not say anything This comes to imply ??? For didn't Rabbah say son of ??? Rav Sheshet said And there are those who say it was Rabbah said son of Avuah he accepts gifts who said after gifts came ??? gifts -- this refers to ??? If it was ??? of it did not say anything nullification She It is not gifts his words ??? Perhaps, wasted from the beginning ??? Abayye said: wasted

דף לב,ב גמרא

two tongues ??? regarding writ ??? of him. he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: regarding gifts ??? of it he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Abayye said: ??? gifts Behold! he ??? practical distinction ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Ravina he found to Rav Nachman bar Yizchak ??? and he arises ??? for him wasted What then? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rav Sheshet said -- and others say it is in a baraita -- writ this No. ??? No. ??? No. ??? No. he sent and not ??? pottery ??? his words ??? he does not ??? he does not permits he does not ??? he does not ??? he does not ??? pottery he ??? he did not say anything They posed this difficulty: Behold! he pottery What then? He said to him Ravina for Rav, ??? the son of of Raba And there are those who say it was Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi what is the difference here, ??? he that which was sanctified for Temple use Behold! he ??? he returns ??? in it Or perhaps, he returns ??? in it Rav ??? he said he returns ??? in it And Rav Sheishet said he does not return ??? in it And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Rav ??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of R' Yochanan for he said: ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? he will come ??? nullify ??? and here in this other case, ??? does anyone lit., who comes to ??? in the first, he was ??? it was said: before how much he ??? Rav ??? he said before two Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said before three Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said before three a court בית דין The tanna teaches: Rav ??? he said before two my heart two also a court בית דין a seminal emission them Rav Nachman said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.