It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לג,א גמרא

so-and-so so-and-so ??? so-and-so and Rav Sheishet because a Tanna taught: For ??? Rav Nachman said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita ??? to the bottom or the witnesses Is this not ??? is equivalent ??? Just as witnesses two Even ??? also two and Rav Sheishet something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has Why do I need ??? Why do I need ??? witnesses Thus can we come and learn from this. that is not ??? It is written ??? witnesses and there is no difference It is written ??? witnesses ??? because of ??? What then does it mean when it says because of ??? the world. R' Yochanan said: because of well-being of ??? he said because of well-being of ??? R' Yochanan said: because of well-being of ??? derive it ??? for he said: before two among two who does not have ??? but it No. ??? and not ??? and there are ??? he said because of well-being of ??? derive it ??? for he said: before three among three there is for them ??? and not ??? and well-being of ??? he That there are The Rabbis taught ??? these are the words of Rabbi Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says It is impossible No. ??? and not ??? on ??? Just as The strength a court בית דין proper and who that it is possible something ??? wasted ??? but on account of Just as The strength a court בית דין proper ??? a man ??? yes. all ??? with the intent is a law established by the Rabbis make kiddush. ??? rabbis ??? of him Ravina said to Rav Ashi: this accounts ??? made kiddush, ??? What is there to say? ??? rabbis ??? The Rabbis taught he said that ten ??? writ ??? It is possible to nullify this that did not have before this these are the words of Rabbi Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says It is impossible to nullify except this before this about what do they disagree? ??? nullification All of it what they disagree about Rabbi reasoned giving witness ???

דף לג,ב גמרא

No. nullification All of it and if ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned giving witness ??? nullification All of it ??? No. ??? a man ??? And if you wish, I could say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world giving witness ??? No. nullification All of it and here in this other case, we were The reason is ??? his reasoning is a saying ??? in the presence of ten Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements among ten ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? What then? The reason is ??? It is because of this: that thus reasoned giving witness ??? nullification All of it and Behold! immediately for he said: them ??? No. ??? or, perhaps, The reason is ??? It is because of this: that thus reasoned all a saying ??? in the presence of among ten Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements among ten ??? even ??? also Come and hear: he said that two ??? writ ??? It is possible to nullify this that did not have before this these are the words of Rabbi Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says It is impossible to nullify except this before this Hey, isn't it the case that two and so when ??? Rav Ashi said If it was ??? "writing" Here, too, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? Here, too, ??? it is taught at the end he said to this alone by itself and to this alone by itself It is possible to nullify this that did not have before this If you say, This is satisfactory ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? "writing" who ??? this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Master, yes. ??? until ??? both ??? Perhaps ??? Joshua son of ??? he reasons for himself. Rav said Shmuel son of Yehudah ??? of him For R' Abba both one like Rabbi and one ??? and not ??? Which like Rabbi and which ??? Rav Yosef said ??? We when Rav Dimi came he said It once happened One who acts Rabbi in accordance with the words of the sages he said before him Rabbi ??? his son of Rabbi Eliezer son of ??? son of his son of R' ??? an adult male If so, Just as The strength a court proper and he returned Rabbi One who acts ??? Shimon son of ??? Shimon son of ??? like Rabbi And even R' ??? their blood ??? reasoned one like Rabbi and one ??? for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? five old men we were at in front For R' ??? their blood ??? he came There was this guy in front ??? on ??? he said to us ??? to it And if it enters your mind to argue that like Rabbi For ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall except Learn from this ??? he reasons for himself. and if You might have thought Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one also ??? Shimon son of ??? For what reason them ??? except Learn from this one like Rabbi and one ??? Shimon son of ??? And Rabba said Rav ??? The halacha is like Rabbi ??? and he does not have for Rav, ??? Just as The strength a court proper For didn't Rav say ??? Shmuel said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.