It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

??? these ??? As it is written (Lev. 26) ??? ??? and Rav Yosef learned: these ??? these ??? As it is written (Deut. 15) ??? He said to him: Raba ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? He said to him ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? It is not necessary for them ??? and thus It was taught by pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? It is not necessary for them ??? and his court ??? of ??? It was taught there: yes. ??? except on ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And if he doesn't have ??? in the midst of ??? all ??? and how much time is the duration of all ??? Rav said Chiyya son of ??? Rav said even ??? of ??? Rav Yehudah said Even if ??? a place ??? upon it ??? Really? ??? Hallel yes. ??? except on ??? only. ??? yes. that is not ??? No. why is it that And this is present here. ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? Rav Ashi ??? for him ??? "and the writing of upon it ??? rabbis of the academy of Rav Ashi ??? Rabbi ??? words to R' Chiyya son of Abba He said to him: ??? something other than this He said to him: No. ??? The Rabbis taught he (??? ) does not have he has ??? upon it ??? to him ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? to him he has ??? upon it ??? from that of Rabbi he gave as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says from where do we learn ??? about his friend a maneh worth one hundred dinars and his fellow about his friend from where do we learn that it shall bring forth from this ??? to this Scripture states: (Num. 5) and gave ??? a guilt-offering to him It was taught there: ??? ??? between with a contract between that did not have with a contract Rav And for Shmuel who both say with a contract a legal document in which there is in it liens on items of movable property that did not have with a contract in which is not liens on items of movable property all the more so ??? on "Here is Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? who both say with a contract a legal document in which is not liens on items of movable property that did not have with a contract ??? on "Here is but: a legal document in which there is in it liens on items of movable property he does not ??? It was taught: ??? of R' Yochanan and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? a legal document obligation ??? and if there are in it liens on items of movable property he does not ??? Another teaching he closes to him field One ??? he does not ??? and not only this, but even the writing of all ??? to you he does not ??? For R' ??? it was. for him This certain individual ??? it is written of him. liens on items of movable property he came in front For R' ??? He said to him: ??? Or perhaps, ??? He said to him he does not ??? and he came in front of R' Yochanan He said to him ??? he came ssi in front of R' Yochanan He said to him ??? Or perhaps, ??? He said to him: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Master, he for he said: he does not ??? He said to him And so because of ??? was it made? It once happened He said to him ??? He said to him Perhaps this particular the academy of Shammai She that they said a legal document ??? he is equivalent. It was taught there: ??? his fellow coins on ??? his legal documents to the court yes. ??? This is satisfactory yielding his legal documents to the court bet din ??? them among judgement except ??? on ??? What is the reason? Rabba said: It is because of this: ??? for him Abaye said to him: Except I can object with text from here: ??? for him Here, too, that is not ??? He said to him: that I ??? for him from that of Rabbi Isaac for he said: Rabbi Isaac from where do we learn ??? obligation who acquires ??? as it is said (Deut. 24) to you ??? justice if he does not he acquires justice from where do we learn from here ??? obligation who acquires ??? It was taught there:

דף לז,ב גמרא

??? obligation to his fellow in the seventh year It is necessary for him ??? to him ??? I and if He said to him: despite the fact thus he shall accept from him as it is said (Deut. 15) and this a thing ??? Rabbah said and he hangs ??? until one said: thus ??? Abaye ??? he gives to him to it is said to him ??? I give to you except it is said to him mine there are. and as a gift I give to you He said to him: He hangs for him also until one said: thus Abba son of ??? Abba son of ??? it was. ??? of him. Rabbah ??? in the seventh year He said to him: ??? I ??? and He went he came Abaye he found ??? He said to him: why is it that ??? Master, He said to him: thus it was. It once happened He went ??? He said to him: ??? for him ??? for Master He said to him: yes. He said to him: And what does it mean when it says He could say to you He said to him: ??? I He said to him: and is what you say? Do you really mean that? for him "Even though it is thus, He said to him: did not say to him And if you say for him "Even though it is thus, it was. ??? now Regardless, ??? and so go ahead and say for him despite the fact thus He went ??? He said to him: "Even though it is thus, ??? of him he said It was not of him. ??? from the rabbis from the beginning Rav Yehudah said Rav Nachman said A person is believed to say ??? he was ??? from me What is the reason? immediately they decreed rabbis ??? No. ??? For they came in front of Rav He said to him: something ??? he was to you ??? For example, this he opens ??? he We have learnt in a Mishna: and thus the master of obligation ??? a legal document obligation And there is no meaning to the word with it ??? Behold! these No. ??? She as it is taught: the taking out a legal document obligation It is necessary for him that it should be with it ??? But the sages say: it is not necessary for him

דף לז,ב משנה

a slave ??? if ??? a slave ??? if ??? son of ??? No. ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says whether like this or whether like that ???

דף לז,ב גמרא

with what are we dealing? Shall I say before ??? son of ??? why is it that No. ??? except after ??? a slave why is it that ??? Abayye said: In reality lit: In the world before ??? a slave ??? for his master ??? son of ??? No. ??? No. for his master ??? and not for his master two for his master two No. for it is the case that ??? son of ??? for his master ??? also No. perhaps, ??? and not ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says whether like this or whether like that ??? his reasoning is in the same way ??? free men lit., sons of freedom thus in the same way a commandment ??? ??? Rava said: In reality lit: In the world after ??? a slave ??? for his master two ??? son of ??? No. ??? No. for his master ??? and not for his master two for his master two No. for it is the case that ??? son of ??? for his master ??? also No. for it is the case that after ??? it was. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says whether like this or whether like that ??? for he said: ??? On account of what did they say whether like this or whether like that ??? that it should not be Each and every one walks ??? himself ??? himself immediately his rabbi; They challenged him from this teaching: He said to them: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel in the same way ??? free men lit., sons of freedom thus in the same way a commandment ??? ??? This is satisfactory ??? for he said: before ??? we were for he says in the same way except to Raba for he said: after ??? This in the same way It is because of this: ??? he He could say to you Raba Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel shall not be know What then does it mean when it says ??? rabbis and thus he comes to say them If it was before ??? we were in the same way If it was after ??? and to Raba for he said: after ??? and for his master two his rabbi; two from those ??? for him ??? who ??? for him yes. ??? for him ??? his hands for he said: ??? from where do we learn some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? ??? his hands as it is said (Lev. 25) also ??? for you from them ??? "You ??? from them

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.