It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

??? of two ??? and the words of all are Rabbah said It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? or he gave as a gift ??? immediately ??? of him completely the words of all are he bought Abaye said to him: ??? does not disagree ??? one the writing ??? for two ??? this one for that one And another teaching One who says all ??? so-and-so ??? Even ??? No. ??? Is this not this one Rabbi Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis No. This and this rabbis this one for he said: all of it this one for he said: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, and if he said ??? No. ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching for he said: all of it ??? Even ??? No. ??? How so? For example, he said: ??? Here, too, ??? For if it was ??? But the beginning of the teaching, for he said: all of it now he said all of it No. ??? he said ??? If it was It is because of this: this one No. ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, that did not have shall you say But the beginning of the teaching, for he said: ??? but: he said all of it ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, for he said: ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching for he said: all of it But nevertheless, No. ??? And if you wish, I would say There is no difficulty. here, with a contract one here, with two documents with a contract one why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? Even if he said all of it also No. ??? So, here, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Even ??? No. ??? In what matters are we saying this? with a contract one but: with two documents ??? and if he said ??? Even with two documents also No. ??? And if you wish, I would say There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, "At the same time," here, "In the case of this one after that one," This is satisfactory that was last No. ??? for it is the case that ??? for him that came first except that came first ??? except ??? from the beginning Rav Ashi said: It is different there in that case that he came a seminal emission them ??? He said to him ??? to Rav Ashi and Perhaps ??? that were Already who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: the writing all ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? Any thing that was He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? R' Shimon says In reality lit: In the world he son of ??? until ??? all ??? my slave except ??? regarding them The reason is for he said: ??? this one did not say thus ??? why is it that Hey, isn't it the case that a slave ??? a seminal emission for him except my slave that he was Already Here in this case, also, ??? that were Already ??? ox day of his rabbi; for his master day of himself for himself Except I can object with text from here: day of his rabbi; ??? a maidservant day of himself ??? the daughter of ??? No. we say it. Come and hear: ??? who ??? a slave ??? son of ??? he gives ??? for his master

דף מב,ב גמרא

??? why is it that Here, too, Let us say, day of his rabbi; for his master day of himself for himself that I Here in this case, that he came ??? So rather, How so? How should we understand this? that is not ??? For example, ??? on ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: he gives to him Sabbath that is large Sabbath a small one then the ruling is acceptable. except to Raba for he said: he does not he gives to him except ??? day and the day This ox he ??? he does not must make restitution except damage Watch out for leading vav And if you wish, I could say ??? a person And if you like, I could say ??? She ??? to Raba No. he reasons for himself. They posed this difficulty: ??? writ ??? he has ??? or he (??? ) does not have (Ex. 21) silver thirty ??? He shall give" ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and that one Is this not "Lord" (Adon) he or, perhaps, immediately ??? writ ??? "Lord" (Adon) ??? of him. Come and hear: ??? who ??? a slave ??? son of ??? he gives ??? for his master ??? Is this not ??? the last one No. ??? the first Come and hear: ??? ??? ??? he would exit ??? he gives he is equivalent. ??? And if you say he has ??? for his master now ??? of him. ??? for him ??? of him. ??? he will give for him for him Perhaps ??? it is not necessary for him as it is taught: in all of them a slave he would exit of them ??? and it is necessary writ ??? these are the words of R' Yishmael Rabbi Meir says: it is not necessary for him Rabbi Eliezer says It is necessary for him Rabbi ??? says it is not necessary for him Rabbi Akiva says: It is necessary for him ??? before Watch out for leading vav But the sages say: ??? these are the words of R' Tarfon ??? Because Torah it has taken possession to him these are the words of Rabbi Akiva in the remainder of Abraham Because ??? the sages he ??? this one ??? except I would say Because ??? the sages he They posed this difficulty: ??? writ ??? he eats from terumah Or perhaps, he eats (Lev. 22) ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and that one Is this not ??? he or, perhaps, immediately ??? writ ??? of him. Come and hear: for he said: Rav ??? Behold! these they eat from terumah and they divide a portion one on ??? this one for that one thus now there i.e., in another mishna if ??? Elijah and he said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? he ??? of him. Here in this case, Is this not ??? he A general principle: They posed this difficulty: a slave ??? his rabbi; ??? Or perhaps, ??? According to Rabbi Meir, ??? According to the sages, ??? According to Rabbi Meir, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? a person ??? a thing that did not have came In reality lit: In the world except For example, fruits dates ??? But here, in this case, who ??? and if ??? to say ??? From where can you derive ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.