It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מט,א גמרא

Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? Rabbi Yishmael reasoned ??? and Rabbi Akiva reasoned ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yishmael ??? (Ex. 22) field to the bottom ??? (Ex. 22) field is more Just as field ??? is more ??? Even field ??? to the bottom ??? and Rabbi Akiva reasoned ??? that he came must make restitution and R' Yishmael ??? he read ??? he read For if it was it has to the one causing damage ??? that are his No. ??? for him ??? Rabbi Akiva says does not come the scripture except ??? from ??? is a kal vachomer ??? What then does it mean when it says is a kal vachomer ??? Shall I say ??? (Ex. 21) ox his neighbor the Merciful One in the Torah says and not ox of that which was sanctified for Temple use except ??? Behold! by the a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? the house ??? No. ??? except the master of obligation and the master of obligation ??? And if you would say his reasoning is Rabbi Akiva the master of obligation ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? obligation which provides proper his strength ??? shall you say ??? which provides ??? his strength ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? and Rabbi Akiva derive it like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says ox of that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? of ??? is exempt and of ??? of that which was sanctified for Temple use between perfect or whether festival must make restitution damage ??? If so, From where can you derive ??? Perhaps ??? and here in this other case, ??? son of ??? And the rabbbis what they disagree about ??? derive it like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? and R' Yishmael derive it ??? If so, What then does it mean when it says does not come the scripture And furthermore, What then does it mean when it says is a kal vachomer ??? And furthermore, this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav Ashi

דף מט,ב גמרא

It was taught: clearly and explicitly (Ex. 22) ??? of one who has suffered damage ??? of one who has suffered damage these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says ??? of one who caused damage ??? of one who caused damage Ravina he said In reality lit: In the world ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva for he said: according to Torah law, ??? and It is Rabbi Shimon who derives an explanation from The reason is ??? and What is the reason? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What is the reason? ??? to them ??? because of ??? the world. as it is taught: he said Rabbi Shimon On account of what did they say ??? to them ??? because of ??? and because of ??? so that ??? a person For what reason I ??? and for what reason I ??? tomorrow a court בית דין ??? field ??? mine ??? on Just as ??? in the Torah ??? For this reason And they said ??? to them ??? On account of what did they say the master of obligation ??? so that that did not have He will see a person to his fellow field ??? and he said ??? so that ??? For this reason And they said ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? If so, you ??? before ??? a woman ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah Rabbi Meir says: ??? he said Rabbi Shimon On account of what did they say ??? a woman ??? the his wife ??? Another thing: a woman ??? or in the case that one is not ??? "and the man he does not ??? except ??? What then does it mean when it says Another thing: And if you would say so that thus it will be and so when ??? to it ??? established to it rabbis her ketuba of him For ??? also ??? for him rabbis her ketuba ??? Come and hear: a woman ??? or in the case that one is not ??? "and the man he does not sent forth except ??? to it ??? a woman ??? Mar Zutra said: the son of of Rav ??? They did not say that except in a case ??? but: of him that are his ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? a woman even In all things also for it is the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: yes. ??? except from ??? except Is this not of him In reality lit: In the world ??? a woman ??? for him ??? I thought to say It is because of this: ??? rabbis ??? Come and learn from this. Rabba said: Come and hear: Rabbi Meir says: ??? a woman ??? from those Shall I say ??? he does not have According to Rabbi Meir, this one For it was taught in a baraita yes. ??? except from ??? except Is this not of him from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis reason that ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? that I ??? a woman It is because of this: ??? Abayye said: Come and hear: ??? to them ??? and the master of obligation ??? a woman ??? from those Shall I say ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? a woman even all Behold! also except Is this not of him Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that it was made evening ??? his son ??? obligation his son ??? his bride and that one For ??? and that one For ??? and the master of obligation ??? also For ??? a woman ??? death ??? and after death from those ??? also For ??? death ??? Is it not enough for him ??? No. ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? Even though it will be the one who does not have ??? to the borrower ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except for one for he said: If it was it has ??? If it was he does not have No. ??? What is there to say? If you wish, I would say ??? for him ??? And if you wish, I would say all to join with the body of the son of ??? it was said: evening ??? the words of all are No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.