It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

Shall I say A deaf person A deaf person son of ??? he For it was taught in a mishna: The entirety are proper ??? ??? except for a deaf-mute and a child and Rav Yosef said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? to it ??? and not ??? to say before ??? before ??? until ??? to Raba it's settled. for Rabbah, it's a difficulty. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? after ??? If so, It is possible also ??? lest he shall return a thing ??? If so, It is impossible also ??? the validity that is not found. and the validity that is not found. No. ??? of it rabbis Hey, isn't it the case that a woman that is not found. and we have learnt in a Mishna: the his wife herself ??? but only ??? to say ??? that did not have ??? If so, the master of also Why is it that It was taught: should it itself ??? it is not necessary to say before ??? before ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says say rabbis It is necessary for him to say before ??? before ??? perhaps, will come the master of ??? for him now ??? and took for him in his hands ??? upon it Come and hear: ??? of him Shmuel ??? two that they brought writ ??? the sea they all require ??? or It is not necessary for them He said to him: It is not necessary for them for just as Watch out for leading vav !! And even they shall say ??? who No. ??? to Raba it's settled. for Rabbah, it's a difficulty. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? after ??? If so, one also ??? lest he shall return a thing ??? If so, among two also among two ??? the validity that is not found. and the validity that is not found. No. ??? of it rabbis Hey, isn't it the case that a woman that is not found. and we have learnt in a Mishna: the his wife herself ??? but only that it herself it requires to say before ??? before ??? that did not have ??? If so, the master of also Why is it that It was taught: should it itself ??? it is not necessary for him to say before ??? before ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says say rabbis It is necessary for him to say before ??? before ??? perhaps, will come the master of ??? for him now ??? and took for him in his hands ??? upon it Come and hear: ??? writ ??? the sea and were given to it and did not say to it ??? if ??? is valid And if not, is invalid, you shall No. ??? to say ??? upon it except ??? upon it to Raba it's settled. for Rabbah, it's a difficulty. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? after ??? lest he shall return ??? If so, you shall No. ??? to say ??? before ??? upon it except ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? he thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: And if you say ??? He ascended ??? you shall No. ??? to say before ??? before ??? upon it except ??? upon it

דף ה,ב גמרא

The reason is What then does it mean when it says perhaps, will come the master of ??? for him now the master of No. ??? We ??? He ascended ??? of R' Yochanan and R' Yehoshua son of Levi One says on account of that do not ??? and one says on account of that do not witnesses ??? son of Levi he for he said: on account of that do not ??? For R' Shimon son of Abba Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? in front of R' Yehoshua son of Levi And he said to him: ??? to say before ??? before ??? or No. He said to him No. ??? Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except ??? that are the first that do not ??? but: ??? No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbah it has of Raba And furthermore, this one say lest he shall return a thing ??? except Rabbi Shimon son of Abba ??? other than this it was. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that that is not He accounts for for him It is because of this: ??? it was said: before how much ??? to it Rabbi Yochanan and R' Chaninah One says before two and one says before three ??? of R' Yochanan he for he said: before two ??? son of Rav Chisda Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? in front of R' Yochanan He said to him: ??? Give to it in the presence of two and so go ahead and say them ??? before ??? Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? for he said: before two his reasoning is on account of that do not ??? and the one who said before three his reasoning is on account of that do not witnesses ??? this one ??? Joshua son of Levi said on account of that do not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: on account of that do not witnesses ??? and here in this other case, in what way does he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yochanan before two And furthermore, this one Rabbah it has of Raba except ??? in the case of witnesses ??? and here in this other case, ??? was it made? until and until was it made? ??? what they disagree about ??? before two his reasoning is ??? was it made? until and until was it made? ??? and the one who said before three his reasoning is ??? was it made? until And there is no meaning to the word until was it made? ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us ??? that until was it made? ??? except Here in this case, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned immediately that a woman ??? ??? There were times when ??? for him ??? He ascended And the other one a woman ??? and not ??? He ascended This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan ??? writ ??? the sea and were given to it and did not say to it before ??? before ??? Let him bring forth ??? a mamzer these are the words of Rabbi Meir but the sages say yes. ??? a mamzer How so? may he do it? ??? and he shall return ??? to it before two and he said before ??? before ??? It is because of this: that is not he said before ??? before ??? Let him bring forth ??? a mamzer yes. ??? with his reasoning for he said: av Hamnunah in the name because of Ulla says he was ??? all ??? the sages ??? Let him bring forth ??? a mamzer son of ??? he is required to include ??? he came in front of Rabbi my brother ??? one who was appointed as deputy to the high priest ??? He said to him It is necessary for him you to stand on all ??? he came in front of Rabbi Ami and R' Assi they said to him No. ??? And if you say ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found you sent forth ??? on ??? that are the first Rabbah son of son of ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? a fraction ??? in front and a fraction No. ??? in front he came in front of Rabbi ??? He said to him: even it is not written: in it except ??? One ??? for the remainder it is not necessary for him Rav Ashi said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.