It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

And there is no meaning to the word ??? Another thing: ??? Israel on ??? and not ??? on ??? What then does it mean when it says Another thing: This is what he means: And if you say Sabbath also Oftentimes ??? day ??? on Shabbat For if it was planted This certain individual day he ??? for him and now and if No. No. ??? for him and now Come and hear: Another thing: ??? Israel on ??? and not ??? on ??? of Rabbi Yehudah ??? Yehudah There is no difficulty. ??? of Rabbi Yehudah ??? them ??? for he said: for him to his fellow ??? son of ??? He said to him: I No. ??? Come and hear: he ate terumah that is tamei must make restitution Those who are ill ??? Those who are ill ??? What then? he said ??? It is because of this: ??? in error ??? restitution with intent yes. ??? restitution but the sages say One of these and one of these ??? restitution and he returns and He will take restitution for Those who are ill ??? and we were at of it with intent why is it that yes. ??? restitution ??? upon it blessing ??? of him something that is not Look, for him in the days of ??? must make restitution for him something ??? for him in the days of ??? Rabba said: And there are those who say it was so that it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: he ate terumah that is tamei must make restitution all ??? he ate terumah that is tahor must make restitution Those who are ill ??? Those who are ill ??? What then? ??? says It is because of this: ??? in error ??? restitution with intent yes. ??? restitution but the sages say One of these and one of these ??? restitution and he returns and He will take restitution for Those who are ill ??? and Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? Here in this case, ??? because ??? There is this difference between them: ??? reasoned No. ??? because ??? but the sages say ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person ??? We ??? Come and hear: blood that became tamei, ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? He could say to you ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person ??? We ??? Come and hear: the tithe on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person ??? We he shall arise ??? Come and hear: ??? vessels on Shabbat in error He shall make use of them with intent He shall not make use of them thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person ??? We he shall arise ??? and pointed out a contradiction. with R' Yehudah ??? Yehudah ??? as it is taught:

דף נד,ב גמרא

??? one ??? and one ??? No. they went up to These are the words of Rabbi Meir. And Rabbi Yehudah Rabbi Yosei and R' Shimon say in error they went up to with intent No. they went up to Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? one it is dealing with a case where there are two wasted And the rabbbis he ??? R' Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna we were The reason is with R' Yehudah It is because of this: ??? and pointed out a contradiction. of R' Yosi ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? of orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree and of ??? the vineyard ??? Behold! this No. ??? and if ??? they went up to on the first and two hundred but only if it is not his intention ??? R' Yosei says Even ??? they went up to on the first and two hundred this one was it said; He ascended Rabba said: ??? yes. a person ??? ??? One and thus For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? yes. a person ??? ??? One

דף נד,ב משנה

the priests. ??? in the Holy Temple ??? they are obligated

דף נד,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught would make with it ??? and he said to him ??? Your nation ??? would make with it ??? And he said to him: offerings? ??? Your nation ??? faithfully but: He said to him: ??? Your nation by day so-and-so ??? and offerings? ??? Your nation by day so-and-so ??? he does not faithfully What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching Abayye said: all ??? faithfully Rava said: For example, ??? and did not say to him and not something ??? thus he found He said to him: This certain individual for he said: for him ??? Your nation by day so-and-so ??? he came in front of Rabbi Ami He said to him: ??? justice. he does not faithfully he said before him abbi Assi Rabbi You say thus Thus said R' Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei Just as I shall do." ??? R' Yitzchak said son of ??? the high priest ??? He corrects and so when he said ??? For it is written (Lev. 16) and every person No. it shall be ??? festival except Is this not It is because of this: ??? and Perhaps ??? If it was Is this not ??? even though ??? also No. ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and Perhaps ??? it is a problem This certain individual who has arrived in front of Rabbi Ami He said to him: a Torah scroll ??? invocations are his No. ??? He said to him: a Torah scroll in the hand of Watch out for leading vav And who said it? for him in the hand of the purchaser He said to him: faithfully you ??? and if you faithfully ??? a Torah scroll He said to him: Rabbi ??? the reward for invocations the reward for ??? Torah completely who ??? He said to him: yes. for all of a Torah scroll that do not invocations are his ??? he does not the value of anything ??? upon them ??? like who Let him say does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita Behold! that he was It is necessary for him to write the Name ??? to write Yehudah and he erred and not ??? in it ??? upon it ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: yes. the Name from ??? even if you say it’s Rabbi Yehudah, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehudah except ??? but: ??? a Torah scroll No. It is because of this: ??? This certain individual who has arrived in front For R' ??? He said to him a Torah scroll ??? are his No. ??? He said to him a Torah scroll in the hand of who He said to him in the hand of the purchaser He said to him: from the midst of that you faithfully ??? you faithfully ??? a Torah scroll

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.