It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סב,א גמרא

??? to it ??? now ??? From a thief ??? No. ??? Rav Yosef said there i.e., in another mishna also ??? and he said ??? R' Yosi son of ??? It is because of this: R' Yochanan ??? who said it in the name of ??? son of ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? with the land ??? but: doing ??? take ??? so that ??? and he places it ??? or ??? to be picked up take ??? and does not ??? And we do not make terumah of ??? but: doing ??? take ??? so that terumah and he places it ??? of ??? with the land to be picked up take ??? and does not ??? and the reason What then does it mean when it says that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: so that ??? but on account of so that ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? but: ??? I would say No. and if ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? for him but: ??? for him I would say it is not necessary to teach this Mar said: take ??? so that ??? and he places it ??? or ??? to be picked up take ??? and does not ??? perhaps, ??? of it ??? for him Look, If it was ??? of it ??? perhaps, No. ??? for him now ??? No. ??? for him Mar said: take ??? so that terumah and he places it ??? of ??? to be picked up take ??? and does not ??? perhaps, ??? of it This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna it has ??? Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says ??? it has ??? for him in a vessel ??? in a vessel stones in a vessel land" ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? Even if ??? the land also So, here, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? of with the land ??? of them ??? the hands of some texts read: worshippers of the stars and contellations some texts read: gentiles ??? For didn't Rav Dimi say son of ??? in the name of Rav yes. ??? with ??? in the seventh year And there is no meaning to the word ??? peace some texts say: to a worshipper of stars some texts say: to gentiles it is not necessary to teach this This comes to imply them ??? in reality This is like of Rav Yehudah He said to them ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? peace some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? Rav Chisda arise and he will give them for peace. Rav Kahana He said to him for peace. ??? and they asked ??? now ??? we ask ??? Rav said ??? No. ??? except ??? as it is taught: No. a person shall enter to his house of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile by day ??? He shall give" to him peace they found ??? he gives to him ??? the tip of Rav Huna and Rav Chisda are they, ??? and it sprouted anew and it comes ??? He said to him one ??? a thing ??? he He said to him: ??? he came ??? He said to them for peace. ??? the kings of for peace. ??? the kings of And they said to him ??? to you is a law established by the Rabbis ??? kings He said to them As it is written (Prov. 8) among kings ??? etc. And they said to him ??? to you ??? for peace. ??? He said to them for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said from where do we learn ??? peace of the king as it is said (I Chron. 12) wind of ??? ??? the tip of ??? etc. they said to him ??? Master, something He said to them Thus said Rav Yehudah Rav said is forbidden to a person that he taste anything until that one give ways of eating ??? as it is said (Deut. 11) and I have given "grass in your field" ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had "And you shall eat and you shall be satisfied

דף סב,ב משנה

One who says ??? writ this ??? or walks writ this ??? if running ??? he shall return the his wife ??? for me writs of divorce of if running ??? No. he shall return For this reason if He said to him: ??? If it was ??? to it except walks and give to it if running ??? he shall return Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says Even ??? for me writs of divorce of if running ??? No. he shall return

דף סב,ב גמרא

He said to him Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi The reason is that is not ??? this one ??? running ??? No. he shall return Learn from this walks ??? he is equivalent. No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you walks Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? writ ??? for him ??? I thought to say Because and the master of Is this not son of ??? he even though ??? No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? and brought he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: We have learnt in a Mishna: the his wife ??? for me writs of divorce of if running ??? No. he shall return Is this not there is no difference ??? there is no difference ??? No. ??? Come and hear: For this reason if He said to him: ??? If it was ??? to it except walks and give to it if running ??? he shall return The reason is for he said: If it was ??? this one did not say If it was ??? if running ??? No. he shall return Learn from this walks ??? he is equivalent. perhaps, ??? This is obvious! a man you shall ??? which provides the master of ??? writ ??? and the woman ??? which provides a woman ??? immediately ??? a man ??? the his wife ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: One who says ??? writ this ??? or walks writ this ??? if running ??? he shall return the his wife ??? for me writs of divorce of if running ??? No. he shall return Is this not it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? so learn from this is valid ??? is valid ??? No. with two ??? Come and hear: For this reason if He said to him: ??? If it was ??? to it except walks and give to it if running ??? he shall return Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? he so learn from this is valid ??? is valid ??? a man you shall ??? which provides ??? he accepts writ ??? a small one a woman ??? to you What then does it mean when it says Rav said ??? Come and hear: Even the women that do not ??? to say did he die ??? ??? and there in that case ??? She Rav Ashi said from the end of the teaching: also Learn from this it is taught at the end the his wife herself ??? ??? but only that it it requires to say before ??? before ??? it was said: that comes for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said ??? for me writs of divorce of This is only in the case he said ??? how much ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said even they come writ ??? It is not ??? Learn from this ??? that are his ??? right next lit: and leaning For if it was ??? right next lit: and leaning ??? from this ??? Rav Ashi said thus now

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.