It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סג,א גמרא

This is satisfactory If it was said ??? for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said that comes for me writs of divorce of This is only in the case he said ??? how much ??? and Thus said Rabbi ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said immediately arrived writ ??? Perhaps, ??? he that he came right next lit: and leaning ??? that are his ??? right next lit: and leaning except Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? he for he said: ??? No. ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? son of Chiyya Come and hear: One who says ??? writ this ??? or walks writ this ??? running ??? he shall return The reason is ??? this one No. running you shall writ But why? this one the master of Is this not son of ??? he except say immediately ??? he said ??? Any time ??? Here in this case, also, immediately ??? he said ??? Any time ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person know that do not ??? and gave for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? Here in this case, ??? Rabba said: Come and hear: a small one ??? for me writs of divorce of he does not writ until he shall have arrived writ ??? For ??? from this ??? But why? Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not ??? except say immediately ??? he said ??? Any time ??? So, here, immediately ??? he said ??? Any time ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person know that do not ??? and gave to it ??? that are his Here in this case, ??? Come and hear: that comes for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said ??? for me writs of divorce of ??? for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said that comes for me writs of divorce of This is only in the case he said walks and give to it ??? to it ??? to it running ??? he shall return ??? writ ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? If it was ??? ??? that are his ??? right next lit: and leaning thus now there i.e., in another mishna he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him ??? how much ??? Here in this case, who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him ??? how much ??? The Rabbis taught ??? for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said ??? for me writs of divorce of and he says walks and give to it ??? to it ??? to it running ??? No. he shall return R' Natan says: walks and give to it running ??? he shall return ??? to it ??? to it running ??? No. he shall return Rabbi says in all of them if running ??? No. he shall return but: if He said to him: If it was ??? to it except walks and give to it running ??? he shall return Rabbi we were Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna If you wish, I would say If it was ??? he came ??? And if you wish, I would say It is to learn from this one Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna Rabbi They posed this difficulty: ??? to R' he gave ??? he is equivalent. or Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Come and hear: One who says ??? writ this ??? or walks writ this ??? running ??? he shall return the his wife ??? for me writs of divorce of running ??? No. he shall return

דף סג,ב גמרא

Is this not ??? and R' he gave No. ??? And Rabbi Come and hear: For this reason if He said to him: ??? If it was ??? to it except walks and give to it running ??? he shall return The reason is for he said: If it was ??? this one did not say If it was ??? running ??? No. he shall return Is this not ??? and R' he gave No. ??? And Rabbi Come and hear: walks writ this ??? running ??? he shall return ??? writ this ??? running ??? No. he shall return one ??? for him for he said: ??? running ??? he shall return R' he gave and he said ??? running ??? No. he shall return Learn from this ??? he is equivalent. Learn from this was it said; ??? for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said ??? for me writs of divorce of and he says walks and give to it he said R' Abba -- Rav Huna said Rav said was it made? ??? This comes to imply ??? for him for Rav, If it was walks ??? he is equivalent. If it was Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Hey, isn't it the case that was it said; walks a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? that I he is liable to him Rav said he is liable ??? and if came ??? he does not return there i.e., in another mishna doubt whether ??? Here in this case, doubt whether ??? Rav said yes. the his wife makes ??? to it ??? immediately ??? and R' Chaninah he said a woman makes ??? to it ??? immediately ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav If you wish, I would say It is because of this: ??? Watch out for leading vav And if you wish, I could say It is because of this: ??? that comes after ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? from the beginning There was this guy ??? to it ??? He went ??? For ??? he said to it ??? he said for him ??? into your hand Rav Nachman said if ??? my slave of it ??? He said to him: Raba and if ??? of it ??? this one No. ??? next to ??? in front For R' Ami ??? them No. ??? next to ??? and R' Chiyya bar Abba he said ??? In the matter ??? in front For R' Chiyya son of Abba he said all Behold! ??? to it ??? so that thus it will be ??? them ??? Here, too, from doubt to us ??? you shall a thing ??? and a thing ??? it was. ??? Rav Isaac son of Shmuel son of ??? writ and chalitza both writ ??? and chalitza after death this particular where they did ??? to it ??? It is written ??? Rav Yitzchak bar Shmuel said son of ??? in the name of Rav they make witnesses ??? He disagreed with this Rabbah who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them ??? and declare ye to it except Rabbah said certainly If it was It is written ??? they make witnesses ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them ??? except Rav Nachman said ??? Even if hundred ??? Raba brought this very question ??? What then? ??? them or perhaps, ??? He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi and he shall carry to it What then? ??? Even ??? for me writs of divorce of if running ??? No. ??? The rabbis taught: ??? for me ??? for me ??? for me into your hand all of them ??? there are.

דף סג,ב משנה

the his wife ??? for me writs of divorce of it requires two ??? witnesses two ??? he said ??? for they would say ??? Even if there are. ??? there are. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.