It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עג,א גמרא

But hey, come and learn from this. ??? on ??? he ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? also No. in the case of ??? gifts yes. For Rabbi Eliezer said: in the name of Rav ??? gifts Rabbah and Raba No. they both reason this way this one For Rav Huna ??? lest they shall say there are writ after death and who that it is possible something ??? shall not be ??? but on account of ??? a man ??? yes. all ??? with the intent is a law established by the Rabbis make kiddush. ??? rabbis ??? of him He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi this accounts ??? made kiddush, ??? What is there to say? He said to him ??? rabbis ??? The Rabbis taught this ??? if ??? this and it fell the house upon it or ??? a snake he does not writ if No. ??? this and it fell upon it the house of or ??? a snake behold! This is הרי זה writ What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching ??? he ate lion, We do not have There was this guy ??? the land ??? he has accepted upon himself all ??? of it ??? he came in front of Ravina He said to him ??? for him for it is the case that ??? all ??? He said to him Rav Acha son of ??? that is not ??? he ??? the validity and it arrived in front of Raba He said to them ??? that is not ??? he ??? Ravina to Raba if No. ??? this and it fell upon it the house of or ??? a snake behold! This is הרי זה writ He said to him: Raba and so go ahead and say ??? he does not writ He said to him Rav Acha ??? but on account of ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? No. ??? He said to him: yes. immediately ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? No. it was said: among ??? She ??? according to reason out the logic. Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? the king ??? upon them all ??? river the king And they said them ??? for it is the case that ??? all ??? they came in front of Raba He said to them ??? that is not ??? he

דף עג,א משנה

we do not cloister with it except before witnesses Even if by the mouth of a slave Even if ??? a maidservant except ??? because of ??? of it ??? Just as She ??? the days Rabbi Yehudah says

דף עג,ב משנה

??? a man for all ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? It is not ???

דף עג,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught She was seen ??? with it ??? or ??? with it under ??? the mattress They do not concern lest ??? In the matter after ??? It is because of this: ??? and They do not concern It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says Even ??? It is because of this: ??? What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah This is what he means: She was seen ??? It is because of this: ??? he gave to it ??? It is because of this: ??? he gave to it and They do not concern It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says Even ??? It is because of this: ??? like who ??? this one for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? but not She was seen ??? the words of all are yes. it requires from him writ two like who in accordance with the words of The entirety He disagreed with this Abaye something ??? The tanna teaches: except Abayye said: This is what he means: She was seen ??? It is because of this: ??? and They do not concern It is because of this: ??? R' Yosi ??? Yehudah says Even ??? It is because of this: ??? like who ??? this one for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? that R' Yochanan said It is a disagreement ??? but not She was seen ??? the words of all are yes. it requires from him writ two like who like R' Yosi ??? Yehudah He disagreed with this Raba If so, What then does it mean when it says Even except Rabba said: This is what he means: Rabbi Yosei son of Rabbi Yehudah says Also, not any She was seen ??? It is because of this: ??? like who ??? this one for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? that R' Yochanan said It is a disagreement ??? but not She was seen ??? the words of all are It is not it requires from him writ like who that is not ??? Just as She ??? the days Rabbi Yehudah says ??? a man for all ??? R' Yosei says ??? It is not ??? a Tanna taught: but only ??? you shall ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us ??? writ after death Rabbah said in the case of one who says ??? that I ??? The rabbis taught: days ??? and in the works of his hand ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.