It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עד,א גמרא

and become tamei to it "The general principle of the thing is that Behold! She ??? in every matter. except that is not it requires from him writ two these are the words of R' Yehudah Rabbi Meir says: ??? that is hanging R' Yosei says ??? doubt whether but the sages say ??? It is not ??? but only ??? What is the difference between ??? to Rabbi Yosei: Rabbi Yochanan said: a guilt-offering suspended There is this difference between them: According to Rabbi Meir, No. ??? a guilt-offering suspended to R' ??? a guilt-offering suspended but the sages say ??? It is not ??? It was the sages who said this Rabbi Yosei There is this difference between them: of Rabbi Zeira for he said: Rabbi Zeira Rabbah said son of ??? Shmuel said in all places where they said the sages ??? It is not ??? he is liable ???

דף עד,א משנה

Behold! this ??? for me two hundred zuz Behold! This is ??? for me ??? and until thirty day if it was given to him in the midst of thirty day ??? And if not, It is not ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel It once happened in Tzidon on the first who said ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? for me ??? and it was lost misplaced ??? and the sages said ??? to him ???

דף עד,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Huna he said but it ??? Rav Yehudah he said ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? or ??? Rav Huna he said but it ??? It is not it requires from him writ two Rav Yehudah he said ??? it requires from him writ two and we have learnt in a Mishna: also regarding ??? For This ??? For it was taught in a baraita One who says ??? Behold! ??? for me in order ??? to you two hundred zuz Behold! She ??? He shall give" and it was said: What then does it mean when it says He shall give" Rav Huna he said This is only in the case He shall give" Rav Yehudah he said ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? based on this lit: from after, Rav Huna he said This is only in the case He shall give" ??? in reality he is fulfilled lit. is stood up ??? and it comes Rav Yehudah he said ??? he will give to it he where they did ??? now No. are they, ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard regarding ??? In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Huna This is only in the case He shall give" It is because of this: ??? but: regarding ??? I would say give thanks for him of Rav Yehudah and if we had heard regarding ??? In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Huna but it ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? but: regarding ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him of Rav Yehudah and if we had heard regarding ??? In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Yehudah ??? It is because of this: ??? but: regarding ??? that is not ??? I would say give thanks for him to Rav Huna. and if we had heard regarding ??? In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Yehudah ??? It is because of this: ??? but: regarding ??? I would say give thanks for him to Rav Huna. Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements They challenged him from this teaching: behold! This is הרי זה ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz despite the fact ??? or ??? and after No. ??? until ??? And furthermore, It was taught: behold! This is הרי זה ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz did he die it was given It is not ??? No. it was given ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? or his brothers? or to one from ??? Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? reasoned for me and not ??? and one master reasons that for me and even ??? from this ??? you shall ??? of Rav Yehudah Rav would say to you Yehudah So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She For Rav Huna said: he said Rabbi all One who says in order ??? he is equivalent. ??? rabbis upon it and I that they said ??? and R' Zayra said: For we were at in Bavel say this one For Rav Huna said: he said Rabbi all One who says in order ??? he is equivalent. ??? rabbis upon it For ??? to Rabbi ??? and he said in the name of Rabbi Yochanan Everyone acknowledges in the case of one who says in order ??? he is equivalent. No. ??? except ??? and after death

דף עד,ב גמרא

For it was taught: ??? and after death writ and does not writ these are the words of the sages Rabbi says ??? writ and of Rav Yehudah for he said: the master of ??? and after death ??? the master of ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi and do they not disagree in the case the master of ??? and to make you acknowledge ??? is a law established by the Rabbis The strength ??? is preferable ??? in order ??? for me from here and until thirty day ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? Is this not ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel It once happened in Tzidon ??? What then does it mean when it says a Tanna taught: where he teaches It once happened ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: if he said to it ??? for me ??? and it was lost misplaced ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? to him ??? and he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel It once happened also in Tzidon on the first who said ??? Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me ??? and it was lost misplaced ??? and the sages said ??? to him ??? abbi Assi brought this very question ??? Yochanan Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz and he returned and he said to it ??? to you What then? ??? According to the sages, ??? According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except that is not ??? But here, in this case, this one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it ??? to you or, perhaps, even Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: except that he came ??? for him for the value but: ??? did not say to him It is not ??? One who says to his fellow ??? that you benefit for me if If it was you he gives to the children of ??? one of ??? and two ??? of wine Rabbi Meir says: is forbidden until that one give But the sages say: Even this It is possible ??? ??? that did not have ??? wise And it is said: ??? it is as if ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? and not ??? Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that No. It is necessary to teach this There was this guy for he said: for him to his tenant. the whole world ??? three ??? ??? four ??? he came ??? Rav Yosef said this one No. ??? Rava said: this one No. ??? Let us say, Rav Yosef for he said: ??? and Rabbah for he said: ??? Shimon son of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us ??? of Rabbah In this case, That is not the halacha ??? Shimon son of ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? Rav Yosef ??? and Rava said to him: I that they said even According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except ??? But here, in this case, It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that No. It is necessary to teach this It was taught there: in the first, he was ??? day two ten new so that that it should be ??? to him he decreed Hallel the elder that it should be ??? ??? ??? and he has entered when does the previous statement apply? ??? and wash ??? Rabba said: ??? of Hallel ??? Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz it was given to him ??? on ??? It is not ??? for him ??? the master of ??? to it ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.