It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עה,א גמרא

from this general principle it would follow ??? the master of ??? did not occur ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? (and there are those who say Rav ??? son of ??? and Perhaps For It was necessary to provide both opinions for him ??? that did not have in his face, but: in his face, between ??? between the master of ??? and there are that they said Rabba said: ??? of Hallel behold! This is הרי זה ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz it was given to him between ??? or whether the master of ??? And so It is necessary to teach this for him ??? that did not have in his face, but: in his face, between ??? between the master of ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? (and there are those who say Rav ??? son of ??? and Perhaps even in his face, also ??? yes. on ??? No. and Hallel What then does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said in all places ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? The halacha is are like him except est ??? and proof the last one The Rabbis taught Behold! this ??? mine It is not ??? in order ??? for me ??? What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching Rav Chisdah said So, with whom does it agree? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel She for he said: ??? to him ??? So, here, ??? for him for the value He disagreed with this Abaye ??? for he said: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel in a case ??? in a case ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? except Abayye said: So, with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: in the case of ??? and here in this other case, this one No. ??? He disagreed with this Raba The reason is that is not ??? this one ??? shall not be ??? all ??? we complete it them ??? My son, ??? and the sons of Reuben? Just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? before ??? Even all ??? before ??? To exclude Here in this case, ??? before ??? except Rabba said: It is because of this: ??? before ??? He disagreed with this Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? The reason is ??? before ??? this one ??? before ??? shall not be ??? all ??? we complete it them ??? My son, ??? and the sons of Reuben? Just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? In the matter one And it once happened In the matter after Even all To exclude Here in this case,

דף עה,ב גמרא

??? And it once happened In the matter one except Rav Adda bar Ahava said It is because of this: ??? And it once happened In the matter one Rav Ashi said: So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She For Rav Huna said: Rav said all One who says in order ??? he is equivalent. ??? Shmuel ??? if No. ??? No. ??? writ and if ??? writ and let us say, if ??? writ and if No. ??? No. ??? writ No. arise ??? a punishment for his own sake and let us say, No. ??? writ if No. ??? in the case of ??? before ??? He disagreed with this Raba ??? all ??? we complete it ??? My son, ??? and the sons of Reuben? Just as there i.e., in another mishna there are. before ??? Even all To exclude Here in this case, ??? before to them except Rabba said: if No. ??? No. ??? writ if ??? writ if No. ??? No. ??? writ if No. ??? No. ??? writ No. arise ??? a punishment for his own sake if ??? writ if No. ??? No. ??? writ in the case of there are. before ???

דף עה,ב משנה

Behold! this ??? Abba in order ??? My son, how much She ??? two two Rabbi Yehudah says eight ten new did he die ??? or ??? Behold! this writ Behold! this ??? Abba two two ??? My son, two two did he die ??? or who said ??? If it was ??? that did not have ??? he does not writ Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? writ A general principle: he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel all ??? that is not ??? Behold! this writ

דף עה,ב גמרא

and who in the case of all this We challenge that from the following baraita ??? one day ??? one day behold! This is הרי זה writ Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty. this one rabbis Hey, isn't it the case that Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel Our mishna Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? rabbis this one ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel you shall from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel except ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel She ??? rabbis Rava said: There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? Rav Ashi said: all ??? also ??? one day he is equivalent. We have learnt in a Mishna: how much She ??? two two Rabbi Yehudah says eight ten new This is satisfactory to Raba it's settled. except to Rav Ashi why do I have two two why do I have eight ten new by day one ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one day ??? two To exclude after two two that is not one day ??? ten new To exclude after eight ten new that is not They challenged him from this teaching: Behold! this ??? in order ??? Abba two two in order ??? My son, two two did he die ??? or who said ??? If it was ??? that did not have ??? he does not writ

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.