It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עו,א גמרא

This is satisfactory to Raba But the beginning of the teaching, that it was not the case that ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? except to Rav Ashi What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching it is a problem The Rabbis taught Behold! this ??? in order ??? Abba two two in order ??? My son, two two despite the fact that did not have ??? Behold! this writ on account of who did not say to it if ??? if No. ??? if ??? and if No. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir but the sages say ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ And if not, he does not writ Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says yes. to you ??? that is not ??? that it is possible that they said to R' ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him and there are that they said According to the sages, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them that it is possible that they said to R' ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him and thus he comes to say for him yes. to you ??? that is not ??? are they, them two the Writings those who are coming back ??? and all two the Writings those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? that it is possible that they said According to the sages, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them and thus he comes to say them yes. to you ??? that is not ??? and we complete it ??? They challenged this from a baraita: Behold! this ??? Abba two two in order ??? My son, two two did he die ??? or did he die ??? he does not writ These are the words of R' Meir But the sages say: despite the fact that did not have ??? Behold! this writ would find it possible She to say to him give for me your father ??? give for me ??? it is a problem of Rabbi ??? it is a problem is a law established by the Rabbis ??? of Rabbi ??? There is no difficulty. there i.e., in another mishna that it was not the case that ??? Here in this case, ??? And the rabbbis ??? There is no difficulty. one the sages ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel She for he said: all ??? that is not ??? Behold! this writ The rabbis taught: he said to it before two Behold! this ??? in order ??? Abba two two and he returned and he said to it before two Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz No. he nullifies these are the words of ??? ??? to him two hundred zuz but: he said to it before two Behold! this ??? for me two hundred zuz and he returned and he said to it before two Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me three hundred zuz he nullifies these are the words of ??? ??? And there is no meaning to the word one from that are the first and one from ??? combine together ??? Shall I say ??? Behold! wasted except He interprets it as referring to the earlier text This is obvious! What would you have said? all ??? combine together Come and learn from this.

דף עו,א משנה

Behold! this ??? if I did not come from here until thirty day and it was the case that walks ??? they come ??? and he returned wasted ??? Behold! this ??? if I did not come from here until thirty day and it was the case that walks ??? and they come ??? and he returned wasted ??? Behold! this ??? if I did not come from here until thirty day and it was the case that walks ??? the sea and they come ??? and he returned wasted ??? Behold! this ??? The whole time ??? Your face thirty day he was walks came walks came Because and not ??? Behold! this writ

דף עו,א גמרא

This comes to imply ??? it was. ??? We challenge that from the following baraita ??? in Yehudah ??? that specific ???

דף עו,ב גמרא

It is not ??? Abayye said: it is a case of two different Tanaaim he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it If it was ??? and if ??? and not ??? they come ??? and he returned that is not ??? it arrived and not ??? also ??? wasted ??? Behold! this ??? if I did not come from here and until thirty day ??? This comes to imply ??? the sea ??? for this statement that Rav said poses a contradiction: ??? For are they, ??? rabbis ??? in Acco, are they, ??? It is because of this: ??? to go out from the land of ??? Abayye said: it is a case of two different Tanaaim he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it If it was ??? the sea ??? If it was ??? and not ??? they come ??? and he returned that is not ??? the sea it arrived and not ??? also ??? wasted ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? The whole time ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. he crossed Rav Huna said What then does it mean when it says Your face ??? But why? a seminal emission for him Your face as a euphemism lit., as elevated tongue ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: In reality lit: In the world Your face actually and really who The tanna teaches: Behold! This is ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ The tanna teaches: that is not you shall writ sleeping ??? you shall ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of R' Yochanan behold! This is הרי זה ??? The whole time ??? Your face thirty day and it was the case that walks came walks came Because and not ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ ??? sleeping They do not concern for behold! No. ??? lest ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Thus said Abba ??? in the name of Rav: in the case of one who says she is believed by the to say that did not have I came, there is someone who teaches this as referring with our Mishna ??? if I did not come from here and until Twelve new did he die in the midst of Twelve new behold! This is הרי זה writ ??? lest ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Thus said Abba ??? in the name of Rav in the case of one who says she is believed by the to say that did not have I came, one ??? to it ??? all the more so ??? one ??? to it ??? but: ??? this one Watch out for leading vav he did not come

דף עו,ב משנה

behold! This is הרי זה ??? if I did not come from here and until Twelve new did he die in the midst of Twelve new he does not writ behold! This is הרי זה ??? if I did not come from here and until Twelve new did he die in the midst of Twelve new behold! This is הרי זה writ if I did not come from here and until Twelve new ??? writ ??? writ in the midst of Twelve new and were given after Twelve new he does not writ ??? writ ??? if I did not come from here until Twelve new ??? in the midst of Twelve new and were given after Twelve new he does not writ Rabbi Yosei says: ??? writ ??? after Twelve new and were given after Twelve new did he die if ??? before ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ and if death to the east ??? he does not writ and if yes. ??? This is where they said ??? It is not ???

דף עו,ב גמרא

a Tanna taught: ??? one ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said among judgement ??? reason that to it like Rabbi Yosi for he said: its time of a legal document ??? upon it Thus said Rabbi Abba the son of Rabbi Chiyya son of Abba that R' Yochanan said R' Yehudah ??? his son of Rabban Gamliel son of Rabbi ??? but they did not agree with him all ??? And there are those who say it was all ??? He said to him R' Elazar to this some elder For ??? or after two ten new ??? for it is the case that No. will come or, perhaps, after Twelve new ??? for it is the case that ??? for him ??? for him Our mishna ??? if I did not come from here and until Twelve new did he die in the midst of Twelve new Behold! this writ ??? you shall for it is the case that No. will come or, perhaps, after Twelve new for it is the case that ??? for him ??? yes. Here, too, but on account of ??? It once happened Abayye said: Everyone acknowledges in a case for he said: ??? the sun ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.