It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

in that place ??? but: it has in that place ??? even though that is not that is high ten and even though that is not you shall four ??? even he ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? are his but: ??? of it ??? Another teaching is like this: Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? are his It is not ??? of it ??? of it ??? its implements of the purchaser ??? he sells it ??? its implements of the purchaser ??? sell he bought the purchaser it is not necessary to teach this ??? ten ??? a place the footprints ??? the footprints No. ??? or ??? why is it that its implements of the purchaser ??? he sells it Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said For example, ??? that is hanging of it and thus R' Eliezer said said Rabbi Osha'ya For example, ??? that is hanging of it and R' Shimon son of ??? he said ??? despite the fact that is not that is hanging Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said For example, ??? to it between ??? Rav ??? son of Rav Dimi he said For example, that he was ??? sell ??? R' Yochanan said: a place ??? to it a place ??? to it Rabba said: What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yochanan on account of that do not a person ??? Not on a place ??? and not on a place ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? to it ??? or ??? or ??? any thing that he was ??? Behold! This is ??? any thing that he was ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? of it dates

דף עח,א משנה

he said to it ??? a legal document obligation this or ??? Consider this case: he ??? he does not writ until ??? to it this one ??? he gave ??? but it that is old ??? Consider this case: he ??? he does not writ until ??? to it this one ???

דף עח,א גמרא

For he said to it this one ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall it was. for him ??? from by regarding ??? Rabba said: ??? from by regarding ??? did not say anything I would say ??? also this one ??? and gave ??? there is not in this case. it is not necessary to teach this ??? to it ??? Another teaching is like this: he said to it ??? a legal document obligation this or ??? Consider this case: he ??? he does not writ until ??? to it this one ??? these are the words of Rabbi Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says In reality lit: In the world he does not writ until ??? and he shall return ??? to it and he said to it this one ??? were given ??? but it that is old ??? Consider this case: he ??? he does not writ until ??? to it this one ??? these are the words of Rabbi Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says until ??? and he shall return ??? to it and he said to it this one ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated ??? the first ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabbi It is because of this: ??? She but: he gave ??? but it that is old ??? the daughter of ??? She I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him to Rabbi Shimon son of ??? And if it was said In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Shimon son of ??? but: ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him to Rabbi Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rabba said: the writing of to it writ and were given in the hand of ??? sleeping ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ ??? he does not writ ??? for him a courtyward ??? that did not have ??? sleeping ??? Behold! this writ why is it that a courtyward ??? She and a courtyward ??? No. he bought And if you say sleeping that I for this statement that Raba said poses a contradiction: all ??? walking No. he bought ??? who dwells No. he bought And the halacha is according to the opinion ???

דף עח,א משנה

it was is standing in a public domain ??? to it ??? to it ??? to him It is not ??? half and half ??? It is not ??? and thus in the matter of ??? and thus in the matter of ??? He said to him: the master of ??? for me ??? to him ??? to the lender took possession ??? to the borrower who borrowed he is liable half and half both they shall divide

דף עח,א גמרא

How so? ??? to it and How so? ??? to him Rav said four cubits of it ??? to it four cubits are his ??? to him How so? half and half he said R' Shmuel son of Rav Isaac For example, that were ??? they stand in four, cubits ??? Which ??? And if you say ??? both of them. together Hey, isn't it the case that it would be impossible ??? except Rav said ??? Here in this case, ??? cubits ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in)

דף עח,ב גמרא

and writ he would exit ??? cubits are his ??? cubits of it Hey, isn't it the case that ??? except Rabbah and Rav Yosef; who both say Here in this case, ??? witnesses is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) One she says ??? to him and one she says ??? to it Rabbi Yochanan says ??? to it We learned: even hundred cubits ??? to him We learned: even hundred cubits How so? half and half Rav Shamen??? bar Abba said To me ??? to it of him of Rabbi Yochanan he It is possible ??? but it it is not possible ??? to him She would find it possible ??? This is only in the case It is impossible ??? to it both it is possible for them ??? both yes. it is possible for them ??? half and half ??? rabbis in front of Rabbi Yochanan in the name of Rabbi ??? Thus said ??? For This The reason is Another teaching is like this: Rabbi Eliezer says: Any thing that was ??? to it ??? came ??? and they brought It is not ??? It is not ??? Any time ??? except Is this not This is what he means: all ??? to it ??? And even came ??? and they brought This is only in the case It is possible ??? but it it is not possible ??? It is not ??? Shmuel said to him: of Rav Yehudah ??? so that ??? and No. ??? until ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi it was. ??? thus ??? and thus in the matter of ??? he said ssi R' Yochanan said: ??? And they said and not to a different matter ??? Rabbi Abba to R' ??? and thus in the matter of ??? It is different there in that case as it is written (Deut. 24) ??? it was ??? and thus in the matter of ??? for me ??? to him ??? to the lender took possession who borrowed ??? to the borrower who borrowed he is liable half and half both they shall divide Here in this case, with what are we dealing? for he said: for him ??? for me ??? If so, what is there to say? it is not necessary to teach this for he said: for him ??? for me ??? what is there to say? What would you have said? ??? He said to him: ??? I about You Come and learn from this. Rav Chisdah said writ ??? in his hand if It is possible ??? opposite him. It is not ??? And if not, ??? What is the reason? in the case of ??? there is not in this case. Rav Yehudah said it was ??? to it even though arrived writ ??? It is not ??? why is it that this one For ??? in four, cubits ??? that it was not the case that ??? cubits ??? who seeks Rabbi Eliezer four cubits where they said there is regarding them ??? or Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? to them ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? for the sake of ??? originally being lost he arises

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.