It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פא,א גמרא

??? for two

דף פא,א משנה

the writing of ??? his wife but he had second thoughts the academy of Shammai say ??? from ??? And the academy of Hillel say despite the fact ??? to it on ??? and not was it made? ??? No. ??? from ???

דף פא,א גמרא

He sent to him Rav Yosef the son of of Rav ??? Teach us, our teacher, he has fulfilled his obligation upon it the voice of a man so-and-so a priest the writing of writ ??? beneath it ??? What then? He sent to him ??? It is necessary for him examination Who is it Shall I say For if it was ??? or No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of Shmuel She and in Nehardaya No. ??? except For if it was ??? "writing" And so ??? "writing" ??? who No. ??? to it "writing" yes. For if it was ??? the validity ??? "writing" Perhaps he gave ??? all ??? nisuin the sanctification of the marriage No. there is a fear of them. for him What then does it mean when it says ??? also ??? If so, you sent forth ??? on his children of ??? immediately ??? he ??? to it ??? No. ??? to it will come to say immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? he said ??? that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? Come and see that did not have ??? that are the first ??? the academy of Shammai ??? Rabbi ??? as it is taught: ??? from terumah these are the words of R' ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? And so Just as One who acts to it ??? this because of ??? to it between ??? from ??? and he said ??? that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: R' Yehudah son of ??? Come and see that did not have ??? that are the first ??? that are the first ??? a way ??? so that ??? a way ??? a way ??? so that ??? from the tithe for he said: Rabbi ??? yes. ??? until ??? the face of the house as it is said (Deut. 26) ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use from the house And Rabbi Yochanan said: even a courtyward ??? as it is said (Deut. 26) and he ate ???

דף פא,א משנה

??? his wife ??? with it ??? the academy of Shammai say It is not it requires from him writ two and The academy of Hillel says: it requires from him writ two when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case who was divorced from ??? "We thank..." ??? from the betrothal that is not it requires from him writ two because of that do not his heart ??? at it

דף פא,א גמרא

Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said It is a disagreement ???

דף פא,ב גמרא

for the academy of Shammai reason that a person makes ??? And the academy of Hillel reason that yes. a person makes ??? but not She was seen ??? the words of all are It is not it requires from him writ two We have learnt in a Mishna: "We thank..." ??? from the betrothal that is not it requires from him writ two that do not his heart ??? of it and if ??? What do I have to learn from from the betrothal and What do I have to learn from from ??? except ??? She was seen ??? and R' Yochanan for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel on that did not have She was seen ??? that is not it requires from him writ two on Just as ??? on ??? a person makes ??? and The academy of Hillel says: yes. a person makes ??? without She was seen ??? in what way ??? That there are ??? there is not in this case. ??? the academy of Shammai reason that No. ??? there are. there are. ??? there are. there are. ??? And the academy of Hillel reason that say there are. there are. ??? there are. there are. ??? "We thank..." ??? from the betrothal that is not it requires from him writ two ??? his heart ??? of it we do not say there are. there are. ??? And who said it? R' Yochanan thus For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say The halacha is ??? She was seen ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yochanan

דף פא,ב משנה

??? from this and from this and all ??? of it writ ??? The entirety ??? upon it these are the words of son of ??? Rabbi Akiva says: yes. ??? upon it except ??? in a place after and Who is writ ??? all ???

דף פא,ב גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? It is because of this: ??? writ ??? The entirety ??? and Rabbi Akiva a slave What is the reason? No. ??? to say is valid ??? also they came to say is valid ??? except a slave we were The reason is ??? they came ??? a thief a thing ??? he ??? Why is it that We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Akiva says: yes. ??? upon it except ??? in a place after ??? yes. a thief No. except a slave we were The reason is ??? to say writs of emancipation of ??? a thief also they came to say a response a slave ??? What is there to say? ??? the whole world ??? R' Zayra said: Rabbah said son of ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? elder Thus said Rabbi ??? son of love writ ??? seven ??? Six Six ??? five five ??? four four ??? three Up to this point, It is a disagreement son of ??? and Rabbi Akiva but: ??? three ??? two the words of all are yes. ??? upon it except ??? Rabbi Zeira said to him: ??? son of ??? all three ??? he is equivalent. Just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? No. So, too, here in this case, also, ??? did not say to him Even To me it is a problem for me ??? for Rav, ??? and Rav Hamnunah according to Rav Adda bar Ahavah, And he said to him: ??? that three ??? a law established by the Torah Another teaching is like this: writ ??? seven ??? Six Six ??? five five ??? four four ??? three Up to this point, It is a disagreement son of ??? and Rabbi Akiva ??? upon it a slave son of ??? says ??? is valid and Rabbi Akiva says: ??? a mamzer but: ??? three ??? two the words of all are yes. ??? upon it except ??? Rav Yosef he would say over is valid For it was taught: ??? Rav Pappa said: It was taught by is valid Rabbi Yochanan said: No. ??? in it except a single witness ??? only. but: two No. Perhaps will come ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? and one is valid Rav Ashi said ??? also ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.