It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פג,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? What then? ??? and it is the law ??? and that one for he says ??? It is because of this: ??? of him. or, perhaps, ??? and if ??? to say ??? What then? ??? and that one for he says Shimon It is because of this: ??? of him or, perhaps, ??? he is required Rav Ashi Even ??? What then? Even ??? he arises or, perhaps, Even ??? he arises ??? The Rabbis taught after ??? of ??? they would enter four elders ??? on his words These are Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean and Rabbi Tarfon and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya and Rabbi Akiva ??? Rabbi Tarfon and he said Behold! ??? -- this refers to ??? his brothers? of this ??? upon it did he die without children" No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found this ??? a thing from the Torah this one ??? that this is not ??? Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean and he said ??? is forbidden to this and it is permitted to this ??? is forbidden for all ??? is permitted. for all this one ??? that this is not ??? Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya and he said ??? a thing ??? between him ??? this one ??? that this is not ??? Rabbi Akiva and he said Behold! ??? -- this refers to and gets married to one from ??? they were to it children" ??? or ??? to this ??? upon it No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found writ wasted ??? this one ??? that this is not ??? Another thing: Behold! that he was this ??? upon it a priest did he die ??? No. ??? a widow opposite him. and a divorcee next to every person is a kal vachomer Just as a divorcee that it lightweight forbidden on account of trapping of ??? a man that it is stricter not all the more so? this one ??? that this is not ??? He said to them: Rabbi Yehoshua We do not answer the lion, after death Rabba said: all of them there is for them ??? for there to be wheat ??? son of ??? the one who does not have ??? Another teaching is like this: R' Yosi said one who sees I these are the words of R' Elazar ben Azarya in words of ??? Mar said: ??? Rabbi Tarfon and he said Behold! ??? -- this refers to and gets married his brothers? of this ??? upon it did he die without children" No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found this ??? a thing from the Torah ??? He uprooted except gifts ??? a thing from the Torah gifts who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it No. ??? to it that is not ??? for him ??? a person except ??? a thing from the Torah ??? Except I can object with text from here: the daughter of ??? No. ??? lest ??? without children" and it is found ??? a thing from the Torah we were ??? and in what way Shall I say outside ??? as it is taught: give thanks ??? his wife and he said to it Behold! it is permitted. by any person. except ??? and the halacha is ??? to one from ??? or ??? to this ??? upon it except the master of ??? R' Yosi the Gallilean and he said ??? is forbidden to this and it is permitted to this ??? is forbidden for all ??? is permitted. for all and not Consider this case: terumah and holy offerings ??? to this and it is permitted. to this ??? a woman ??? say Consider this case: ??? we say it. Behold! ??? a man we were ??? and in what way Shall I say the master of ??? Behold! ??? opposite him. ??? except outside ??? Rabbi Akiva and he said Behold! ??? -- this refers to ??? to one from ??? they were to it children" ??? or ??? and gets married to this ??? upon it No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found writ wasted ??? If so, ??? of the world also No. ??? Perhaps No. ??? for him ??? and it is found writ wasted ??? we were ??? and in what way Shall I say outside ??? as it is taught: give thanks he was ??? his wife and he said to it Behold! it is permitted. by any person. except ??? and the halacha is and gets married to one from ??? or ??? to this ??? upon it except the master of ??? Another thing: Behold! that he was this ??? upon it a priest did he die ??? No. ??? a widow opposite him. and a divorcee next to every person ??? for just as a divorcee that it lightweight forbidden It is because of this: trapping of ??? a man is stricter is it not all the more so? and in what way Shall I say the master of ???

דף פג,ב גמרא

Behold! a divorcee opposite him. ??? except outside and Rabbi Akiva If it was except he reasons for himself. ??? except and if in order he reasons, ??? in order Rabbi Akiva we heard for him That there are for he said: except and there are for he said: in order ??? except This ??? in order This ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? If you were to say prohibits the priesthood that I this one ??? also ??? the priesthood ??? for him Raba like Rabbi ??? It is because of this: an elderly person one ??? He said to them: R' Yehoshua We do not answer the lion, after death This comes to imply of R' Yehoshua ??? he reasons for himself. Hey, isn't it the case that ??? also ??? This is what he means: them To me also ??? for me ??? between To me between ??? We do not answer the lion, after death And what does it mean when it says ??? of R' Yehoshua as it is taught: R' Yehoshua said: There is an analogy between ??? the second ??? the first Just as ??? the first that is not ??? other than this Even ??? the second that is not ??? other than this Back to the main body of the text: give thanks ??? his wife and he said to it Behold! it is permitted. by any person. except ??? and the halacha is ??? to one from ??? or ??? to this ??? upon it ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? a response according to the words of ??? for this ??? and this permits and not Consider this case: ??? permits there i.e., in another mishna ??? he ??? to it For if it was ??? this one ??? Behold! nedarim-vows to bring an offering ??? wise permits this one that R' Yochanan said yes. wise permits anything except ??? Behold! ??? that a woman ??? and the master of ??? there i.e., in another mishna Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? in the name of Raba for he said: Rav ??? in the name of Raba all ??? on the understanding of ??? She ??? Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya and he said ??? a thing ??? between him ??? this one ??? that this is not ??? And the rabbbis This ??? What then does it mean when it says my slave for him ??? them to account for that which was taught behold! This is הרי זה ??? that did not have ??? wine ??? that did not have ??? your father In reality lit: In the world yes. this ??? thirty day behold! This is הרי זה ??? And the other one ??? And the other one he is spiritually cut off ??? No. ??? Rabba said: behold! This is הרי זה ??? that did not have ??? wine all my days: life yes. this ??? all my days: life so-and-so behold! This is הרי זה ??? what is the difference here, life so-and-so ??? for him ??? life that are his also Perhaps ??? for him ??? except I would say all my days: ??? yes. this ??? all my days: life or life so-and-so behold! This is הרי זה ??? Raba brought this very question ??? the day If it was ??? tomorrow ??? What then? ??? to R' Eliezer ??? According to the sages, ??? to Rabbi Eliezer Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna except ??? that he came Sarai ??? Sarai In reality lit: In the world But here, in this case, No. or, perhaps, there is no difference ??? According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except that is not a division from of him ??? But here, in this case, immediately which was divided by a division from according to ??? he returns ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.