It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פו,א גמרא

To exclude ??? of him Raba ??? for he said: the day If it was ??? tomorrow ??? of writ ??? Behold! the daughter of ??? Behold! ??? Rav Yehudah with a contract ??? from ??? and from ??? and from ??? the king ??? No. ??? from all ??? and from ??? until ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Abayye said: ??? and the vinegar of wine ??? for him ???

דף פו,א משנה

three ??? and if gets married ??? is valid the writing of in writing ??? And there is no meaning to the word upon it witnesses there are upon it witnesses And there is no meaning to the word in it time there are in it time And there is no meaning to the word in it except a single witness Behold! these three ??? and if gets married ??? is valid Rabbi Eliezer says: despite the fact that do not upon it witnesses except ??? to it before witnesses is valid ??? that do not the witnesses ??? on ??? except because of ??? the world.

דף פו,א גמרא

And, too, there is not in this case. And this is present here. writ sleeping there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? This is satistfactory ??? Here in this case, ??? except ??? Here in this case, No. ??? What is there to say? there i.e., in another mishna Let her be married ??? Here in this case, once it has been done And this is present here. writ ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? a mamzer Here in this case, ??? is valid This is satistfactory to Rabbi Meir ??? all ??? the sages ??? except According to the sages, What is there to say? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, No. ??? This is satistfactory ??? Here in this case, No. ??? except ??? Here in this case, ??? What is there to say? ??? No. ??? And this is present here. peace the kingdom of there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, No. ??? This is satistfactory ??? Here in this case, No. ??? except ??? What is there to say? ??? a mamzer Here in this case, ??? is valid This is satistfactory to R' ??? except According to the sages, What is the difference ??? to it ??? and there in that case ??? a mamzer Here in this case, ??? is valid ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? Behold! of which we were speaking? ??? this one that teaches ??? writ ??? the sea were given to it and did not say ??? before ??? before ??? Let him bring forth ??? a mamzer these are the words of Rabbi Meir but the sages say yes. ??? a mamzer How so? may he do it? ??? and he shall return ??? to it before two and he said before ??? before ??? the writing of in writing ??? And there is no meaning to the word upon it ??? Rav said the writing of his hand We learned: ??? Shall I say He interprets it as referring to the earlier text This is obvious! the writing of his hand The tanna teaches: So rather, ??? Behold! there are upon it witnesses except ??? there are in it time And there is no meaning to the word in it except a single witness

דף פו,ב גמרא

??? the writing of his hand and until but: the writing of ??? and until No. And Shmuel said Even if the writing of ??? and until for behold! We learned: the writing of ??? and until is valid Rav who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna Let her be married ??? Here in this case, once it has been done And for Shmuel There is no difficulty. this one in the Sifra ??? Hey, isn't it the case that in the Sifra that is not ??? and thus R' Yochanan said: ??? He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer Behold! there are upon it witnesses He said to him: ??? Oftentimes Rav said ??? Oftentimes Rav said No. ??? How so? there are to it children" No. ??? It does not have children" ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Mar Zutra son of ??? and all of them that were of them doubt whether ??? or doubt whether ??? Behold! these ??? and not ??? How so? doubt whether ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- to it ??? doubt whether ??? to it doubt whether ??? to him ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? the writing of in writing ??? And there is no meaning to the word upon it witnesses there are upon it witnesses And there is no meaning to the word in it time there are in it time And there is no meaning to the word in it except a single witness Behold! this doubt whether ??? And if you say No. ??? We come to compare ??? And there is no objection at all. ??? is a law established by the Rabbis She Levi said In reality lit: In the world No. ??? and thus R' Yochanan said: In reality lit: In the world No. ??? and thus He said to them R' Yochanan to the children of R' ??? their blood ??? Thus said ??? In reality lit: In the world No. ??? It is not ??? A sin-offering What then does it mean when it says ??? Abayye said: ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Daniel son of Rav ??? all ??? invalidate it ??? A sin-offering except for ??? because of ??? and if ??? except ??? he the Tanna does not distinguish. ??? No. ??? and a small one ??? and up to how much he said R' ??? (and there are those who say R' Ami until ??? R' Elazar says even though ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said The halacha is ??? For ??? in front of Shmuel he said Even ??? Rav reasoned ??? No. this one The tanna teaches: ??? Rabbi Eliezer both he said Rav reasoned ??? upon it ??? and thus R' Yaakov said son of This he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi The halacha is ??? And Rabbi ??? he said even ??? yes. in it And Rabbi ??? he does not have For R' ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: According to the sages, even ??? yes. in it and thus he said R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina Raysh Lakish said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? And R' Yochanan said: even ??? yes. in it Let us say, R' Yochanan he does not have For R' ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: According to the sages, even ??? yes. in it He sent to him R' Abba -- son of ??? son of Master, he is required of him ??? The halacha is ??? or That is not the halacha ??? For Rav Huna He said to him: Rabbah the son of Thus said Abba in the name of Raba The halacha is ??? In the matter The halacha is It is because of this: our rabbi, And they said The halacha is ??? for he said: Rav Chama son of ??? Rav said The halacha is ??? that it is possible that they said ??? In the matter The halacha is and his student our rabbi, It is because of this: our rabbi, And they said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? for he said: Rav Chisda Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? and thus For he came ??? R' Eliezer said Rav said The halacha is like Rabbi ???

דף פו,ב משנה

two ??? two ??? they agree ??? he gives both ??? and both of them, ??? For this reason ??? one from them Behold! the second wasted five ??? A general principle: in the midst of ??? a man so-and-so ??? so-and-so ??? and the witnesses downwards all of them are proper ??? for all One and one he was written ??? for all one and one and the witnesses downwards ??? with it is value

דף פו,ב גמרא

Which Tanna taught: he said R' ??? that is not ??? For if it was R' Elazar immediately for he said: ??? Kerati this one No. ??? Abaye said Even if you say R' Elazar I would say who seeks R' Elazar "writing" ??? who ??? five ??? A general principle: ??? How so? A general principle: How so? ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: time one for all of them ??? A general principle: time for all one and one ??? he said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.