It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

For he said No. also are they, ??? why is it that Hey, isn't it the case that ??? No. except Is this not ??? that which she said yes. No. ??? And learn from this ??? the giving of coins and not anything She ??? of it ??? in the name For Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ??? If it was ??? them ??? in them? Here in this case, ??? and if ??? that is not it's settled. to it ??? Rav ??? because all of them ??? judgement We have a tradition that So, here, ??? If it was ??? them ??? Rav Acha son of Rav in front of Ravina ??? What then does it mean when it says He sent to him We No. we heard to us this one For Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua You that has heard Let them go ??? to it this particular ??? that he was ??? he came There was this guy ??? he said for him ??? he said to it If it was ??? for me ??? and he said ??? would find it possible to say yes. ??? Raba ??? or ??? a sela coin ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? to us between ??? that is not ??? as it is taught: he said to it ??? a sela coin -- this refers to that I he is liable ??? and he returned and he said to it ??? for me in it in the hour of the giving of coins ??? No. ??? It is not ??? after the giving of coins even ??? It is not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says No. ??? Shall I say ??? that which she said yes. No. ??? that which she said No. this one ??? are they, ??? For there i.e., in another mishna except ??? that which she said yes. No. ??? It was taught by ??? What is the reason? would find it possible to say yes. ??? So rather, it is a problem ??? or ??? a sela coin ??? except Is this not Learn from this this one ??? this one that is not ??? For ??? of Rav ??? rabbis ??? He said to him one of the rabbis and R' Ya'akov ??? thus Thus said Rabbi ??? Thus said Rabbi with whom does it agree? in the same way that do not a woman ??? in less ??? thus in the same way yes. ??? in less ??? And they said to him For it was taught: despite the fact that do not a woman ??? in less ??? in less ??? He said to him For this teaching ??? as it is taught: ??? in a vessel And even though in which is not the value of ??? he returns ??? this one for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said all that is not know ??? No. ??? to him ??? with them he said ssi Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? In reality lit: In the world -- more ??? as it is said (Hosea 4) ??? and he steals ??? with its monetary value? ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? ??? Rav Yosef ??? on ??? they add and then it is written (Hosea 4) because of this ??? the land ??? all who dwells of it ??? the field ??? the heavens also ??? the sea ??? etc. And even ??? No. ??? on fish ??? as it is said (Gen. 7) from all who on dry land Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? and not fish ??? And even Here in this case, even fish ??? and so go ahead and say until that He performs ??? No. You might have thought As it is written (Jer. 23) For because of ??? the land and so go ahead and say ???

דף יג,ב גמרא

Is it written ??? it is written ??? this one For it was taught in a baraita the his wife ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said This is only in the case ??? but not ??? No. Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? Is this not a law established by the Torah Rav Assi said: that R' Yochanan said even though that did not have ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? it was. a law established by the Torah Hey, isn't it the case that They disagreed about this, one ??? of Rav And for Shmuel who both say ??? on "Here is It is not ??? from ??? and not from ??? and R' Yochanan and Reish Lakish: who both say ??? on "Here is ??? between from ??? between from ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated In this case, ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Shmuel It is because of this: that is not ??? her ketuba in the Torah She but: ??? I would say give thanks them to Rabbi Yochanan ??? and if we had heard In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yochanan ??? her ketuba in the Torah ??? with a contract is comparable but: ??? I would say give thanks for him ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rav Pappa said: ??? on "Here is ??? from ??? and does not ??? from ??? from ??? a law established by the Torah and does not ??? from ??? the one who does not have ??? And she "acquires" herself ??? and with the death of ??? This is satisfactory writ As it is written (Deut. 24) "and the writing of to it ??? except ??? From where do we derive this? reason out the logic. he he ??? This is only in the case ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? them and not Sarai them except ??? the Merciful One ??? that it does not have children" forbidden this one there are to it children" it is permitted. and perhaps, It does not have children" forbidden ??? and there are to it children" ??? the World: also forbidden except ??? the Merciful One a widow ??? forbidden this one ??? and perhaps, ??? the World: ??? This One who acts What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was ??? If it was that is not ??? the first Why is it that No. ??? on One who acts something ??? originally ??? in them? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? and the blessing of the Service ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? in them? ??? and the blessing of the Service ??? except ??? he read (Deut. 20) ??? a man after ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? the son of of Rav This I would say one after ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? two ??? In the matter one ??? No. ??? after And furthermore, it is written (Deut. 24) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? "and the writing of to it ??? or For ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? death ??? Just as ??? Even death ??? and The yebamah is "acquired" by means of sexual relations ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.