It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

And the other one this particular ??? the value of he who has arrived as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says: from where do we learn ??? that it ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there (Lev. 14) ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? And the other one If so, Let Scripture say ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And the other one This certain individual should bring himself ??? and not its ear And the other one ??? to it (Ex. 21) ??? it is said ??? and not cubits And the other one should bring himself until ??? a slave And the other one tanning ??? And the other one a slave ??? No. he expounds. What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? that came first for he said: sell himself yes. ??? to him ??? the Merciful One regarding ??? a court בית דין (Deut. 15) ??? to him to him and not ??? himself And the other one This certain individual should bring himself to him and not ??? why is it that No. ??? the Merciful One Just as ??? Even This ??? except to him and not ??? to us in reality like Rabbi he gave as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi he gave from where do we learn ??? about his friend a maneh worth one hundred dinars and his fellow about his friend from where do we learn that it shall bring forth from this ??? to this Scripture states: (Num. 5) and gave ??? a guilt-offering to him he came to him To exclude And the other one in reality also No. ??? to us like Rabbi he gave What is the reason מאי טעמא of the first tanna? for he said: sell himself yes. his rabbi; yielding to him a maidservant ??? the Merciful One regarding ??? a court בית דין (Ex. 21) if ??? He shall give" to him a woman to him and not ??? himself And the other one to him the master of ??? And the other one ??? the reward for ??? as it is taught: (Deut. 15) For ??? the reward for ??? Your servant ??? he does not ??? except by day a Hebrew male slave ??? between by day or whether by night And so ??? on ??? between by day or whether by night Does it not clearly ??? say (Deut. 15) For good to him Your nation Your nation ??? Your nation ??? and R' Yitzchak said from here ??? yielding to him a maidservant ??? And the other one If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. except Which Tanna taught: that is not he learns it ??? This a Tanna taught: he as it is taught: (Lev. 25) ??? to ??? etc. he said ??? son of Ya'akov a bamah an elevated place for offerings. is what the scripture says. If it was ??? himself Behold! Already say If it was ??? Behold! Already say this one yes. is what the scripture says. except ??? a court בית דין two and three years before ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that he learns it ??? why do I have let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said In reality lit: In the world he learns it ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say sell himself he that is not a slave ??? but: ??? a court בית דין ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. Mar said: If it was ??? Behold! Already say Who is it as it is taught: (Lev. 25) ??? a man to ??? a man to ??? etc. a bamah an elevated place for offerings. is what the scripture says. If it was ??? himself Behold! Already say If it was ??? a court בית דין Behold! Already say this one yes. is what the scripture says. except ??? two and three years before ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? Rabba said: son of ??? Scripture states: a man Who is a thing ??? And there is no meaning to the word accustomed ??? you shall says -- this refers to ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? a court and It is necessary to teach this ??? slave whose ear is pierced For if it was we had heard ??? a court בית דין It is because of this: that is not ??? but: slave whose ear is pierced ??? I would say ??? and if we had heard slave whose ear is pierced It is because of this: ??? for him ??? but: ??? a court בית דין that is not a slave for him ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this and It is necessary to teach this ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? In reality lit: In the world For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: In reality lit: In the world then I might incorrectly say: In reality lit: In the world actually and really Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case that is not a slave ??? but: in a case ??? No. ??? a donkey from its beginning Just as ??? Even ??? also ??? Come and hear from this. In reality lit: In the world ??? of ??? except Which Tanna taught: that is not he learns it ??? Rabbi She as it is taught:

דף טו,ב גמרא

(Lev. 25) and if No. ??? Rabbi says ??? he ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as who that is not ??? this ??? is it not logical ??? Scripture states: ??? he ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? and if You might have thought he learns it ??? why is it that he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for just as who that is not ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said In reality lit: In the world he learns it ??? that I Here in this case, For scripture said: (Lev. 25) ??? to this and not after and Which Tanna taught: ??? upon it of Rabbi R' Yosi the Gallilean and Rabbi Akiva as it is taught: (Lev. 25) No. ??? R' Yosi the Gallilean says ??? in the remainder of every person ??? Rabbi Akiva says: ??? in the remainder of every person ??? What is the reason? of R' Yosi the Gallilean Scripture states: if No. ??? except ??? and went out ??? and Rabbi Akiva says: if No. ??? except ??? and went out ??? and R' Yosi the Gallilean something except ??? it is written except ??? he read what they disagree about (Lev. 25) or ??? or son of ??? this ??? (Lev. 25) or ??? this ??? himself ??? -- this refers to ??? others R' Yosi the Gallilean reasoned the written Torah ??? before him my field ??? himself Just as ??? himself ??? Even ??? and Rabbi Akiva reasoned the written Torah ??? after it my field ??? others ??? himself Just as ??? himself ??? Even ??? others ??? If so, ??? why do I have If it was Is this not ??? the written Torah ??? between before him between after it The entirety ??? If so, he returns ??? except ??? what they disagree about Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean reasoned ??? others ??? For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? are they, ??? and not ??? for him and Rabbi Akiva reasoned ??? For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? all day and day He went ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean and Rabbi Akiva but: the sages say The entirety ??? one the sages Rabbi She ??? for him for this ??? other than this and the written Torah ??? between before him or whether after it And Rabbi This (Lev. 25) and went out ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself to account for that which was taught and went out ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.