It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

this one rabbis this one Rabbi Shimon One teaching ??? And another teaching yes. ??? There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one rabbis this one Rabbi Shimon ??? A deaf person ??? Rav Acha the son of Rabba said to Rav Ashi that it is possible ??? Just as ??? the house of ??? the cities of wall which provides ??? his strength ??? In reality lit: In the world shall you say ??? his strength ??? In reality lit: In the world He said to him Rav Acha elder to Rav Ashi It is because of this: That there are to say ??? judgement ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. the trapping of sell field ??? He corrects ??? his strength ??? In reality lit: In the world And there is no meaning to the word ??? Just as ??? field ??? which provides ??? his strength ??? immediately sell the house of ??? the cities of wall He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Even I ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? He said to him Mar Zutra the son of of Rav ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? in the year the second shall you say ??? his strength ??? in the year the second He said to him Ravina It is because of this: That there are to say a Hebrew male slave ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? He corrects ??? his strength ??? in the year the second And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rav Huna brought this very question son of ??? the house of ??? the cities of wall ??? or yes. ??? Just as field ??? It is not ??? Even This also yes. ??? or perhaps, For ??? redemption ??? it is written: ??? No. it is written He said to him he does not ??? (Lev. 25) in all redemption ??? houses and a Hebrew male slave Is this not houses the cities of wall No. houses ??? houses ??? clearly and explicitly it is written in them? (Lev. 25) on field the land ??? This certain individual ??? guilt-obligation and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Eliezer as it is taught: (Lev. 25) ??? ??? is a voluntary act You say is a voluntary act Or perhaps, except guilt-obligation Scripture states: (Lev. 25) a man For No. it shall be to him ??? And so there are a person ??? that do not to him ??? except this in which there is to him and does not ??? in his hand these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua Rabbi Eliezer says ??? ??? guilt-obligation You say guilt-obligation Or perhaps, except is a voluntary act Scripture states: in all redemption ??? the scripture ??? guilt-obligation they said to him rabbis to Rav Ashi And there are those who say it was Ravina to Rav Ashi This is satisfactory ??? houses the cities of wall it is written in all except ??? houses ??? What then does it mean when it says in all it is a problem ??? Abaye Just as Scripture states: ??? three occasions ??? all ??? Is this not houses the cities of wall and a Hebrew male slave No. houses ??? houses ??? clearly and explicitly it is written on field the land ??? Like that which was said by Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak ??? before So, here, ??? before in a case it was said: ??? son of Isaac to this other teaching ??? them a Hebrew male slave ??? to Israel ??? Or perhaps, ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi No. ??? to you for he said: who that is not ??? Perhaps, No. ??? For ??? to you who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis What then does it mean when it says ??? and not ??? or perhaps, ??? to this and not after Come and hear: in all redemption ??? houses and a Hebrew male slave Is this not houses the cities of wall and a Hebrew male slave ??? to Israel No. a Hebrew male slave ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? a Hebrew male slave ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? clearly and explicitly it is written of him. (Lev. 25) or ??? or son of ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

This certain individual ??? guilt-obligation And even if to Rabbi Joshua Come and hear: Just as Scripture states: (Lev. 25) ??? three occasions ??? all ??? Is this not houses the cities of wall and a Hebrew male slave ??? to Israel No. houses ??? houses ??? clearly and explicitly it is written in them? (Lev. 25) on field the land ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? and the slave whose ear is pierced is acquired ??? As it is written (Ex. 21) ??? ??? and he acquires himself with the Jubilee and with the death of ??? As it is written his male slave and not ??? and not ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? of ??? The rabbis taught: ??? yes. for me except ??? from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 15) ??? any thing ??? in the hand of these are the words of R' Yosi ??? Yehudah Rabbi says Just as ??? of ??? Even all of ??? Another explanation: ??? an adult male Rabbi Eliezer said ??? he was ??? yes. ??? except ??? but the sages say yes. a Hebrew male slave a priest slave whose ear is pierced because of that it was made the master of ??? are these ??? how a Hebrew male slave a priest may he do it? the master of ??? this one yes. slave whose ear is pierced except ??? of ??? about what do they disagree? of Rabbi he expounds. ??? A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? of ??? Even all of ??? R' Yosi he expounds. ??? ??? ??? had a vision The entirety What then does it mean when it says Rabbi Rabbi In all things What then does it mean when it says ??? Mar said: ??? an adult male What is to be heard to support this reading? Like that which was said by Raba (Gen. 32) ??? So, here, ??? R' Elazar said ??? he was ??? yes. ??? except ??? but the sages say yes. a Hebrew male slave a priest slave whose ear is pierced because of that it was made the master of ??? may he do it? the master of ??? Rabba bar Rav Sheyla said: Scripture states: (Lev. 25) ??? to ??? They posed this difficulty: a Hebrew male slave a priest What then? ??? to him his rabbi; a maidservant ??? he there is no difference priests and They did not teach this לא שנו Israel or perhaps, that I priests Because ??? of them the scripture the commandments ??? Rav said: is permitted. And Shmuel said is forbidden He said to him Rav ??? for Rav, ??? For ??? the house of the Master i.e., Rabah Shmuel ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא No. ??? but the sages say yes. a Hebrew male slave a priest slave whose ear is pierced because of that it was made the master of ??? yes. his rabbi; yielding to him a maidservant ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for me ??? (Ex. 21) ??? ??? ??? and My son, there is not in this case. Watch out for leading vav !! And naught else something They posed this difficulty: a priest What then? ??? he there is no difference a priest and there is no difference Israel or perhaps, that I priests Because ??? of them the commandments ??? Rav said: is permitted. And Shmuel said is forbidden ??? the first ??? does not disagree who permits that is not ??? Torah except opposite the inclination for ecil Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? the second Rav said: is permitted. And Shmuel said is forbidden Rav said: is permitted. Because ??? And Shmuel said is forbidden for it is the case that ??? to it female convert ??? No. ??? there are those who say איכא דאמרי ??? the second ??? does not disagree ??? to it female convert Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? the first Rav said: is permitted. for it is the case that No. ??? Torah except opposite the inclination for ecil And Shmuel said is forbidden all in a case ??? of him. (Deut. 21) ??? to ??? of him. and you see ??? all in a case that is not ??? of him. ??? to ??? No. ??? of him. and you see ??? The Rabbis taught and you see ??? in the hour of ??? and even ??? a man ??? No. ??? Torah except opposite the inclination for ecil that is good for him ??? Israel meat

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.