It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

tefillin And which are they the commandments One who acts that did not have ??? the tooth ??? a lost item ??? he Behold! ??? happiness ??? which is a "Thou Shalt" commandment ??? the tooth women ??? And, too, Consider this case: ??? Torah ??? and redemption ??? the commandments One who acts ??? the tooth he women ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: yes. ??? from ??? and even in a place as it is said in it except For it was taught in a baraita in all we make an eruv ??? except for ??? and salt And, too, there is not in this case. ??? except yes. ??? from ??? and even in a place as it is said in it ??? the commandments One who acts ??? the tooth women ??? From where do we derive this? ??? Just as tefillin women ??? Even all the commandments One who acts ??? the tooth women ??? tefillin ??? to it ??? Torah Just as ??? Torah women ??? Even tefillin women ??? tefillin ??? tefillin for talmud Torah ??? between ??? the first between ??? the second tefillin ??? the second No. ??? for talmud Torah No. You might have thought As it is written (Deut. 11) so that I shall increase your days men he is required life ??? it does not require life Consider this case: a sukkah which is a "Thou Shalt" commandment ??? the tooth As it is written (Lev. 23) ??? seven days The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? to discharge the mitzvah the women this one Is this not thus women ??? Abayye said: It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that Because As it is written ??? similar to ??? Just as ??? a man and the wife lit. his wife Even a sukkah a man and the wife lit. his wife And Rabba said

דף לד,ב גמרא

It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? five ten five ten ??? the commandments. Just as there women ??? Even here, women ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Consider this case: proof which is a "Thou Shalt" commandment ??? the tooth and the reason ??? the Merciful One (Ex. 23) ??? to discharge the mitzvah the women this one Is this not thus women ??? It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? proof proof ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Abayye said: a woman ??? a widow What is there to say? ??? opposite him. and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? It is because of this: ??? two the Writings that come ??? and all two the Writings those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? If so, tefillin and proof also two the Writings that come ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: tefillin and it is not written: proof then I might incorrectly say: let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? proof proof ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: proof and it is not written: tefillin then I might incorrectly say: ??? tefillin ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements If so, ??? also It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. for what It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. This is satisfactory If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and it is not written: ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? five ten five ten ??? except ??? the Merciful One ??? and it does not require ??? and I I thought to say ??? are obligated women is it not all the more so? ??? it was. them two the Writings that come ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: yes. ??? except for one for he said: ??? What is there to say? And, too, the commandments One who acts that did not have ??? the tooth women ??? From where do we derive this? ??? Just as ??? women ??? Even all the commandments One who acts that did not have ??? the tooth women ??? and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Torah It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? Torah ??? two the Writings that come ??? and all two the Writings that come ??? yes. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.