It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ד,א גמרא

??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. is comparable This ??? for this ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? to it for the domain "Lord" (Adon) ??? and here in this other case, ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering from this ??? to it ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? and that one (Ex. 21) ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? he who has arrived this one he had asked for him to account for that which was taught as it is taught: ??? although we don't deserve it. these my days: ??? yes. silver these my days: ??? Ravina said If so, Let Scripture say ??? silver What then does it mean when it says yes. silver yes. silver ??? this but: there are silver ??? after and one ??? And from where do you derive ??? thus as it is taught: (Lev. 22) and seed It does not have yes. for me except ??? seed ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: seed It does not have ??? to it And there is no meaning to the word for me except seed is valid seed is invalid, from where do we learn Scripture states: seed It does not have ??? to it Hey, isn't it the case that ??? seed ??? No. It is necessary to teach this he read ??? children" Behold! there are. ??? For It is necessary to teach this he read ??? is invalid, and it was taught ??? who derives an explanation from thus They said: it is written (Num. 22) one Bil'am (Deut. 25) and one ??? that is not it is written in them? ??? and here in this other case, it is written of him. ??? Learn from this ??? he who has arrived and It is necessary to teach this ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? It once happened his hand ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: It is because of this: that is not ??? in them? but: It once happened his hand that he came ??? in them? I would say ??? are they, and if we had heard It once happened his hand that he came ??? of him but: ??? to it I would say ??? are they, ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? although we don't deserve it. these my days: ??? yes. silver these my days: ??? and let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? and it does not require ??? Rabbah said came this teach on this something ??? as it is taught: ??? this ??? the world ??? this ??? two it is said ??? and he does not say ??? and as for me, says ??? the world he does not he eats ??? two not all the more so? Watch out for leading vav !! And even thus I was says ??? this ??? two but: ??? the world he eats came ??? on ??? the world he does not he eats He said to him Abaye who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna two ??? and so when also Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? slave whose ear is pierced does not eat and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had the writing of Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one it was. ??? the validity That it comes ??? and the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read except Here in this case, one Back to the main body of the text: She For ??? to it ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? except Abayye said: No. ??? except ??? For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough ??? No. Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough Come and learn from this. He disagreed with this Master, son of Rav Ashi Is this not is a kal vachomer he for just as signs that do not ??? for the domain ??? for the domain "Lord" (Adon) ??? for the domain ??? is it not logical ??? for the domain "Lord" (Adon) except Mar said: son of Rav Ashi No. ??? except ??? For it might have entered your mind that I would say: That it comes ??? you shall ??? that is not We come to compare ??? shall not be ???

דף ד,ב גמרא

Come and learn from this. (Ex. 21) ??? although we don't deserve it. etc. and for Master son of Rav Ashi for he said: Is this not is a kal vachomer he this one say the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? but: in a case That there are ??? and it was taught ??? to it from here as it is taught: (Deut. 24) "When a man takes a woman" ??? and it was the case that if No. ??? in His eyes For he found of it etc. yes. ??? except By means of money And thus it says (Gen. 23) "Give me money; take the field from me" Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as A Hebrew female slave that is not ??? By means of money -- this refers to ??? is it not logical ??? By means of money ??? It is not ??? By means of money Just as ??? which provides yes. ??? with a contract shall you say ??? with a contract Scripture states: For ??? a man this one why do I have he read this one We come to compare to it Rav Ashi said It is because of this: That there are to say from the beginning that judgement ??? to it ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? By means of money shall you say ??? that is not ??? By means of money Scripture states: For ??? a man and It is necessary to teach this ??? although we don't deserve it. and It is necessary to teach this ??? For ??? a man For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: For ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? to it the master of ??? are they, Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? although we don't deserve it. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? although we don't deserve it. then I might incorrectly say: in a case ??? for him ??? are they, ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: For ??? and not For ??? This teaches ??? Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as ??? that do not ??? By means of money ??? -- this refers to ??? By means of money is it not logical ??? A Hebrew female slave ??? By means of money And there is no meaning to the word ??? Just as ??? that do not ??? shall you say ??? Scripture states: ??? why do I have he read this one We come to compare to it Rav Ashi said It is because of this: That there are to say from the beginning that judgement ??? to it ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? and is standing shall you say ??? that do not ??? and is standing Therefore, scripture states: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.