It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

on Passover one as it is said (Ex. 12) ??? that specific all ??? Israel twilight And so all ??? all of them ??? Is it not the case that he does not ??? except one except from here for all of Israel they go out on Passover one ??? for him of him and perhaps, It is different there in that case is what he has ??? except from here (Ex. 12) and they took to them a man ??? the forefathers ??? and perhaps, there i.e., in another mishna also is what he has ??? If so, two ??? why do I have if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? that is not ??? This should bring himself ??? Isaac for thus said Rabbi Isaac a man he merits and not ??? he merits This certain individual (Ex. 12) From the man on account of he ate ??? should bring himself ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual derive it ??? yes. ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For Rav Gidal said that Rav said from where do we learn Those who send a person are like him as it is said (Num. 34) ??? one ??? one ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? from here ??? for it is the case that ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that children Is this not My son, ??? except This is like of Raba son of Rav Huna for he said: Raba son of Rav Huna Rav Gidel said that Rav said from where do we learn ??? to a person that did not have in his face, as it is said ??? one ??? one ??? She this one guilt-obligation also that it is possible That there are ??? for him ??? and not it's settled. for him ??? and there are ??? for him ??? and not it's settled. for him ??? So rather, ??? son of Rav Huna for he said: Raba son of Rav Huna Rav said ??? Thus said Rabbi from where do we learn ??? for the court ??? to them ??? why is it that except ??? Scripture states: ??? one ??? one ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Shmuel said ??? a court ??? to them ??? to them a portion proper and if ??? Rav ??? that are his he said if ??? for if so, Just as The strength a court proper and who it has for Rav, ??? If so, Just as The strength a court proper For it was taught in a mishna: Assessment of ??? or ??? wasted Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? Shimon son of ??? If so, Just as The strength a court בית דין proper Rav Huna said son of ??? Rav Nachman said The halacha is in accordance with the words of the sages There is no difficulty.

דף מב,ב גמרא

this one that erred this one that is not ??? If it was that is not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Nachman said ??? Behold! there are. ??? less than ??? is acquired a purchase ??? on ??? wasted a purchase ??? he bought and he turns ??? Rabba said: this one of which we were speaking? less than ??? is acquired a purchase They did not say that except in a case that is not ??? but: ??? he said ??? and not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that of which we were speaking? ??? wasted a purchase They did not say that except in a case that is not he said ??? of the academy of judgement but: he said ??? of the academy of judgement ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived For it was taught in a baraita Assessment of ??? or ??? wasted Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived Hey, isn't it the case that of which we were speaking? ??? he bought and he turns ??? They did not say that except in a case ??? but: ??? yes. ??? They did not say that except in a case ??? but: ??? No. ??? for he said: Rabbah any thing ??? even less than ??? also he returns Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? in the hand of A deaf person a mute and a child is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? in the hand of ??? he is liable But why? Let him say ??? of a person are like him It is different there in that case ??? for a matter of transgression ??? these are the words of ??? these are the words of ??? these are the words of who ??? that did not have One who acts ??? from by One who acts ??? the master of the house from by For One who acts ??? the house the master of the house from this from by why is it that Let him say yes. ??? for a matter of transgression that I the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? Just as terumah ??? Even the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? It is because of this: that there is the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? a hand two the Writings that come ??? and all two the Writings that come ??? yes. ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things this one of which we were speaking? ??? a hand Who is it as it is taught: (Ex. 24) on any thing ??? The academy of Shammai say ??? on ??? and The academy of Hillel says: he is not liable until ??? in it a hand as it is said if No. ??? etc. And they said the academy of Shammai ??? Is it not the case that it is said on any thing ??? And they said to them The academy of Hillel to the academy of Shammai Is it not the case that it is said (Ex. 24) if No. ??? his neighbor And they said the academy of Shammai ??? If so, on any thing ??? why do I have that it is possible yes. for me except he he said ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: on any thing ??? This is satistfactory ??? except to the academy of Shammai ??? for him on this verse ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.