It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מג,א גמרא

let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? of him It is because of this: ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? two the Writings that come ??? and all two the Writings that come ??? yes. ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things this one of which we were speaking? ??? Who is it Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? or ??? Just as ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after Even ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: or ??? ??? of the academy of ??? a Tanna taught: under ??? ??? This is satistfactory ??? two the Writings that come ??? yes. ??? except ??? What is there to say? ??? the Merciful One ??? except (Lev. 16) blood ??? This certain individual blood he poured it he and not ??? regarding ??? except in all the Torah From where do we derive this? ??? except ??? except ??? he returns Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: (Lev. 16) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man This certain individual if he does not one topic ??? one topic for all the Torah All of it ??? two the Writings that come ??? yes. ??? Behold! This certain individual This certain individual What then does it mean when it says he expounds. in them? one ??? two ??? and one he and not ??? he and not ??? he and not ??? And the other one ??? This certain individual And the other one he This certain individual No. he expounds. Hey, isn't it the case that for it teaches: One who says ??? "Go!" ??? ??? he he is liable ??? is exempt Shammai the Elder says It is because of this: ??? "The prophet ??? he is liable as it is said (II Sam 12) that specific ??? My son, ??? What is his reason ??? the elder his reasoning is two the Writings that come ??? This is only in the case This certain individual No. he expounds. And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world he expounds. And what does it mean when it says he is liable he is liable ??? heaven from this general principle it would follow of the first tanna? reasoned even ??? heaven also is exempt except judgement Rabbah judgement ??? There is this difference between them: And if you wish, I would say It is different there in that case ??? the Merciful One that specific ??? My son, ??? And the other one Behold! to you ??? My son, ??? Just as ??? My son, ??? yes. you ??? upon it Even ??? If it was you ??? upon it What is the reason? ??? it was. for he says for him (II Sam 11) ??? Yoav." and all my slave ??? on the field "And those that were to pitch tents Rabba said: ??? reasoned ??? two the Writings that come ??? This is only in the case This certain individual No. he expounds. give thanks in the case of one who says ??? "Go!" ??? ??? ??? that he was he is liable ??? is exempt that did not have ??? in all the Torah All of it this benefit and this ??? it was said: Rav said: ??? was it made? until of the academy of Rabbi ??? We say: Yes! ??? was it made? until What is the reason מאי טעמא of the academy of Rabbi ??? Shall I say It is because of this: that is not He said to him you shall for me until Except I can object with text from here: ??? a woman before two and did not say to them "You ??? So, here, that is not are they, ??? except Rav said: ??? was it made? until ??? of the academy of Rabbi ??? We say: Yes! ??? was it made? until immediately As Mar said: ??? of a person are like him it was. for him ??? They challenged him from this teaching: he said that three ??? and His holiness for me the his wife one ??? and two witnesses these are the words of the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel say all of them ??? there are. And there is no meaning to the word ??? was it made? until Up to this point, does not disagree except in a case where there are three but: with the passage of the requisite number of years the words of all are No. he for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says The academy of Shammai say: ??? and a single witness And the academy of Hillel say ??? and a second person witnesses Rav ??? and Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over ??? Rav said: yes. ??? was it made? until of the academy of R' ??? They said: ??? was it made? until ??? was it made? until Rabba said: Rav Nachman said he said that two ??? and His holiness for me the his wife there are. there are. ??? there are. there are. ??? and thus ???

דף מג,ב גמרא

and thus ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? lest ??? he gave of it and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: ??? my heart two No. ??? but: ??? I would say Behold! ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is ??? his fellow ??? It is necessary for him ??? Behold! ones who touch ??? For if it was They said: No. ??? He said to them ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, his reasoning is ??? his fellow ??? it is not necessary ??? to say ??? to the borrower it is possible for them to say ??? to the lender and now ??? rabbis ??? Behold! witnesses that I will give for him ??? that is not ??? for him ??? for him ??? A man betroths lit: sanctifies ??? It was taught there: ??? She ??? ??? Rabbi Yehuda said yes. two ??? except ??? he accepts ??? and all that do not would find it possible to watch ??? yes. would find it possible ??? he said Reish Lakish: ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are ??? and not She and he said R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina What is his reason of R' Yochanan who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? herself to domain ??? between She or whether ??? herself for the domain ??? and not She Consider this case: ??? herself for the domain ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.