It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א גמרא

a small one from the betrothal yes. ??? of it ??? except ??? between ??? herself between ??? that do not thus ??? except If it was said thus it was said: he said Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina What is his reason of R' Yochanan who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? and not She ??? between She between ??? Behold! ??? And we have learned between She or whether ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? And Rabbi She as it is taught: One who makes ??? that did not have ??? Rabbi says he bought but the sages say No. he bought What is his reason of Rabbi ??? Just as ??? the master of ??? So, too, here in this case, also, ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? Just as ??? Even So, here, ??? about what do they disagree? Rabbi reasoned words ??? it was. for him ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? it was. for him ??? So, here, ??? Rabbi Yochanan When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, Just as that do not thus ??? except Let him say ??? He could say to you Reish Lakish: So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: yes. two ??? as one If it was Rabbi Yehudah Just as that do not thus ??? Just as that do not thus ??? should bring himself yes. So, here, ??? a Tanna taught: also Just as that do not thus ??? And Rabbi Yehudah what is the difference here, ??? Because ??? and is standing Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: R' Yochanan also No. ??? to you from the beginning that I ??? Because ??? and is standing We have learnt in a Mishna: A man betroths lit: sanctifies Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? in it ??? in it ??? there is not there ??? No. ??? He could say to you Reish Lakish: Here, too, it is Rabbi Yehudah and who seeks ??? to it like Rabbi Yehudah ??? at the end of the teaching, One who says ??? for me ??? -- this refers to ??? for me ??? say Which Tanna taught: ??? and Rabbah said It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: until ??? for all one and one And if you say All of it R' Yehudah ??? derive it like Rabbi Shimon and who derive it For it was taught: This is the general rule: A general principle: he is not liable except One creates an exclusion he is liable on all One and one These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah says ??? No. to you No. to you No. to you he is liable on all One and one ??? No. to you No. to you No. to you and not to you ??? he is liable on all One and one R' Shimon says In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until ??? for all one and one except All of it R' Shimon She ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah ssi Not on to the house of study he found to Rabbi Zeira He said to him: What then does it mean when it says say ??? among ??? He said to him: Even I No. ??? R' Avin: he ??? and he said ??? All of it ??? Yochanan ??? For ??? (Deut. 24) ??? it was there is not in this case. ??? of him. He said to him: Rabbi Avin: son of ??? he He said to him: yes. ??? he Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said I No. Rabbi Avin: ??? Chiyya and not Rabbi Avin: son of ??? except Rabbi Avin: ??? for what practical distinction ??? that are his ??? Raba brought this very question ???

דף מד,ב גמרא

??? What then? ??? immediately ??? is comparable or ??? is comparable ??? is comparable Just as ??? Even She also ??? or perhaps, ??? is comparable and until ??? No. ??? and who from doubt for him to Raba this one For didn't Raba say the writing of writ and were given in the hand of ??? sleeping ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ ??? he does not writ ??? why is it that he does not writ ??? to it a courtyward ??? that did not have ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? is comparable For it arrived ??? also No. ??? to it a courtyward ??? that did not have with understanding ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, This is obvious to him. and so when a hand ??? is comparable So, too, here, ??? for him who ??? or No. He said to him yes. makes ??? a small one ??? for me writs of divorce of he does not writ until he shall have arrived writ ??? this one ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? to it ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, if he said ??? "Go!" ??? writ ??? if running the master of ??? in it No. he shall return from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? to it ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: a small one ??? for me writs of divorce of he does not writ until he shall have arrived writ ??? this one ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? to it ??? but: there are to it ??? and he said ??? "Go!" ??? the master of ??? No. ??? it was said: a small one ??? that did not have with understanding ??? Shmuel said it requires writ it requires ??? he said ??? items ??? if writ For what reason ??? if ??? For what reason writ And they said to him this one Master, ??? among ??? in my granting atonement ??? in front of Rav He said to them God it requires writ it requires ??? for him ??? son of Abba ??? thus and the reason What then does it mean when it says Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? it requires writ lest ??? it requires ??? lest No. ??? and they shall say yes. ??? he said ??? This is only in the case ??? he said even ??? It is not it requires even though ??? one ??? this one No. he would say over Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. that they said Ulla said a small one ??? that did not have with understanding ??? even ??? It is not it requires He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Kahana and all of them if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? or ??? or ??? or ??? are permitted ??? one Shall I say ??? to it writ ??? except Is this not ??? And we have learned ??? he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it For example, that it was made to it It once happened ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... av Hamnunah yes. ??? It is because of this: R' Elazar And they said ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.