It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מו,א גמרא

can be seen these are the words of ??? Rabba said: What is the reason of Rav? ??? Because was it made? of it It once happened ??? it was said: a small one ??? that did not have with understanding ??? Rav said between She or whether ??? it is possible for them ??? Rav ??? he said ??? and not She ??? Rav Huna for Rav, ??? And there are those who say it was Chiyya son of Rav for Rav, ??? (Ex. 22) if one ??? yes. for me except ??? She herself from where do we learn Scripture states: if one ??? In any case, He said to them Rav No. ??? according to ??? It is possible ??? Let them go For example, ??? that did not have ??? that did not have ??? he read he is required he said ??? son of Isaac to say ??? He said to him Rav Yosef If so, we were ??? (Ex. 22) ??? to him ??? from him ??? and if ??? why do I have He said to him Abaye it requires ??? with understanding ???

דף מו,א משנה

One who says ??? for me ??? -- this refers to ??? for me ??? if there are in one from them the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? if there are the value of ??? in all of them ??? And if not, It is not ??? it was ??? the first the first It is not ??? until that it should be in one from them the value of ???

דף מו,א גמרא

Which Tanna taught: ??? Rabbah said It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: until ??? for all one ??? if there are in all of them ??? Shall I say He interprets it as referring to the earlier text why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? Even if Minchah-offering of also for it is the case that ??? for me ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: except ??? and even ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? She Rabbi Yochanan said: Behold! table Consider this case: meat Consider this case: ??? and We do not have to eat Rav And for Shmuel They said: both of them. In reality lit: In the world He interprets it as referring to the earlier text and not ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? Minchah-offering of For if it was that it is possible the value of ??? yes. If it was No. No. but: ??? Because ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. Rabbi Ami he said In reality lit: In the world ??? And what does it mean when it says until that it should be in one from them the value of ??? until that it should be ??? the value of ??? Rabba said: Learn from this from that of Rabbi Ami three Learn from this ??? It is not ??? And learn from this ???

דף מו,ב גמרא

And learn from this coins in reality ??? it was said: ??? Rav said: coins ??? And Shmuel said coins gifts Rav said: coins ??? a person know that do not ??? and gave ??? and let us say, to it ??? reasoned No. ??? And for Shmuel reasoned coins gifts a person know that do not ??? and gave ??? gifts And let him say to it ??? gifts reasoned ??? to it the validity He challenged this "He" meaning... Ravina ??? he does not ??? in the hand of a priest But why? ??? in the hand of a priest Let him say a person know that do not ??? and gave for the sake of lit. in the name of gifts It is different there in that case ??? Oftentimes is what he has ??? less than ??? and that one ??? for him together but his thought is ??? and comes ??? a person know that do not ??? know and he does not know know that do not ??? and he does not know ??? their reason What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: ??? terumah and It may not be eaten until ??? upon it ??? from someplace else who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: from ??? on that is not ??? terumah and It may not be eaten until ??? upon it terumah ??? from someplace else it is dealing with a case where there are two with whom does it agree? ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? No. ??? And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world a priest ??? but his thought is the master of the house ??? and comes ??? a person know that do not they separate ??? know and he does not know know that do not they separate ??? and he does not know ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: ??? upon it ??? terumah and he shall return and separate terumah who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? on ??? terumah and he shall return and separate terumah this one ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? No. ??? and not ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? and it is found ??? terumah and he shall return and separate terumah It is different there in that case ??? terumah ??? She from that of Rabbi ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? from where do we learn ??? from the evil on ??? terumah as it is said (in Numbers 18) and not ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? ??? if he does not ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned For what reason from here ??? from the evil on ??? terumah Rabba said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.