It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מז,א גמרא

They did not teach such a ruling except for he said: to it ??? but: he said to it ??? even ??? also ??? For ??? It was taught: ??? of Raba ??? for me ??? or who said to it ??? for me ??? if there are in all of them the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? if there are ??? the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? And furthermore, ??? And furthermore, ??? It is not ??? until that it should be in one from them the value of ??? This ??? How so? Shall I say for he said: to it or ??? or ??? or ??? if there are in all of them the value of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that or he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: So rather, ??? we were ??? except Is this not for he said: to it ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, or who said to it ??? for me ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? for me ??? How so? For example, he said: to it ??? for me ??? And we have learned at the end of the teaching, ??? if there are in one from them the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? And even But the beginning of the teaching, No. ??? between ??? Learn from this all in a case for he said: to it ??? For ??? Learn from this This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? he arises And what does it mean when it says until that it should be in one from them the value of ??? until that it should be ??? the value of ??? Here, too, until that it should be ??? the value of ??? except for Rav, And for Shmuel who both say He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises ??? for him Here in this case, ??? No. ??? He accounts for So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She for he said: there is no difference an olive's volume an olive's volume and there is no difference an olive's volume and an olive's volume ??? Rav said ??? It is not ??? Let him say ??? It is not ??? and there are those who say ??? Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? Is this not ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? for this he bought If you say, ??? in what way ??? Rav Nachman said ??? to it of matters ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, who said to it ??? for me ??? and it is found a maneh worth one hundred dinars lacking ??? one master reasons that ??? to it the validity ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? to it the validity ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For Rabbi Eliezer said: ??? for me ??? and gave to it ??? Behold! This is ??? he makes it up Let us say, ??? he said ??? They said: a maneh worth one hundred dinars lacking ??? to it the validity ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars lacking ??? and nine No. ??? to it the validity ??? They challenged him from this teaching: One who says ??? for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand and the halacha is ??? or ??? if a remnant would remain from him the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? even though that did not have a remnant would remain from him the value of ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says It is because of this: Rabbi Meir ???

דף מז,ב גמרא

Behold! She ??? Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? reasoned ??? even though that is not a remnant would remain ??? the value of ??? and one master reasons that a remnant would remain ??? the value of ??? yes. and if No. a remnant would remain ??? the value of ??? No. but: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world make kiddush. ??? he said ??? Raba ??? this one ??? this one ??? She This ??? How so? If it was ??? upon it liens on we were ??? If it was that is not he has accepted upon himself liens on If so, ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? despite the fact that did not have a remnant would remain ??? the value of ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? that did not have ??? upon it liens on but: ??? upon it liens on even though that is not a remnant would remain ??? the value of ??? except ??? thus ??? despite the fact ??? the value of ??? It is not ??? R' Shimon son of ??? says It is because of this: ??? Behold! She ??? about what do they disagree? Rabbah said ??? According to the sages, ??? Rav ??? and it is the law ??? what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and it is the law ??? and one master reasons that ??? and it is the law ??? I thought to say them ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? they stand What is the reason? No. ??? Just as Watch out for leading vav !! and the request ??? he is liable ??? is it not all the more so? except Here in this case, ??? There is this difference between them: and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For Rav Huna said: ??? from his fellow ??? in it ??? No. ??? in it No. ??? Let us say, ??? he said ??? No. Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? that is not ??? but: ??? the words of all are ??? in it yes. No. ??? in it No. ??? Let him say ??? for me with a contract obligation or that he was to him ??? in the hand of others ??? upon them Rabbi Meir says: ??? but the sages say It is not ??? This a legal document obligation How so? Shall I say a legal document obligation ??? we were ??? in the hand of others except Is this not a legal document obligation ??? and in the Holy Temple ??? what they disagree about In reality lit: In the world a legal document obligation ??? and here in this other case, ??? with a contract ??? on "Here is ??? with a contract in what way ??? of Rabbi And the rabbbis what they disagree about as it is taught: letters ??? these are the words of Rabbi but the sages say between ??? and not ??? between ??? and it is not written: No. he bought until ??? Master, it has of Rabbi Master, he does not have of Rabbi And if you wish, I would say ??? who does not have of Rabbi and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about for he said: Rav ??? And if one ??? It is necessary for him ??? for him ??? to you he and all ??? Master, it has of Rav ??? Master, he does not have of Rav ??? And if you wish, I would say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them of Rav ??? and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about for Shmuel said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.