It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

??? a legal document obligation to his fellow and he returned ??? And even if ??? it has of Shmuel Master, he does not have of Shmuel And if you wish, I would say ??? there is for them of Shmuel and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about one master reasons that a woman ??? he said No. ??? for him To me ??? for him ??? and one master reasons that a woman also No. ??? on "Here is in what way ??? Rav said For Rav Huna said: Rav said a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? he bought one master reasons that and thus he comes to say Rav that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? No. and one master reasons that there is no difference ??? and there is no difference ??? Let him say ??? for me with a contract Rabbi Meir says: It is not ??? and R' Elazar says ??? but the sages say ??? ??? if there are in it the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? This a legal document How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? it is a problem of Rabbi Meir ??? except ??? and in the Holy Temple ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? son of Isaac Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? with a contract that do not upon it witnesses ??? with his reasoning for he said: ??? the conclusion lit, the seal Kerati and R' Elazar ??? for he said: ??? Kerati And the rabbbis from doubt them If it was like Rabbi Meir If it was like Rabbi ??? Therefore, ??? ??? if there are in it the value of ??? And if not, It is not ??? And if you wish, I would say For example, ??? that did not have ??? what they disagree about who seeks Reish Lakish: a legal document betrothal ??? that did not have ??? What then? ??? Just as ??? in the case of ??? Even ??? also in the case of ??? or, perhaps, ??? Just as ??? No. in the case of ??? Even ??? No. in the case of ??? according to ??? he returns ??? (Deut. 24) ??? it was There is an analogy between ??? Master, it has ??? Master, he does not have ??? And if you like, I could say ??? there is for them ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? or in the case that one is not ??? of Raba and Ravina Rav ??? Rav ??? what they disagree about ??? or in the case that one is not ??? Raba and Ravina They said: ??? Rav ??? Rav ??? They said: It is not ??? Let him say ??? as it is taught: Make for me ??? earrings and finger-rings ??? I to you immediately ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir but the sages say It is not ??? until he shall have arrived money or property ??? This money or property How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say that specific money or property from this general principle it would follow of the first tanna? reasoned Even if that specific money or property also No. except in what way in it ??? except Is this not ??? after And learn from this in the Holy Temple ??? what they disagree about and reason that ??? that is old ??? from the beginning ??? the end of and it was ??? Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? It is not ??? No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world make kiddush. ??? It is not ??? and here in this other case, ??? from the beginning and until the end of what they disagree about one master reasons that

דף מח,ב גמרא

It is not ??? except in the rear of and one master reasons that that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of And if you wish, I would say ??? that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of and make kiddush. ??? It is not ??? and here in this other case, ??? he acquires ??? implements of what they disagree about one master reasons that artisan he acquires ??? implements of and one master reasons that yes. artisan he acquires ??? implements of And if you like, I could say ??? yes. artisan he acquires ??? implements of and that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of and make kiddush. ??? It is not ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? to it ??? of his. ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? as it is taught: For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? For a payment ??? Your nation ??? R' Natan says: For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? and all the more so For a payment ??? Your nation Rabbi Yehudah ??? says ??? And they said between For a payment ??? between For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? and if ??? to it ??? of his. ??? between Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna to Rabbi he gave There is this difference between them: ??? between Rabbi Natan according to R' Yehudah ??? There is this difference between them: ??? one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ???

דף מח,ב משנה

??? for me ??? this of wine and it is found of honey of honey and it is found of wine ??? this of silver and it is found of gold of gold and it is found of silver in order that I ??? and it is found Responded Responded and it is found ??? It is not ??? Rabbi Shimon says: if ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? for me ??? this One teaching in it And regarding what ??? And another teaching in it and not a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? And another teaching a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? and not in it And there is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? this one ??? if ??? Behold! This is ??? and he does not have ??? wine and it is found vinegar vinegar and it is found wine both it is possible for them ??? at them." Perhaps, that it is possible ??? for him ??? and there are ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also, that it is possible it's settled. for him ??? and not it's settled. for him ??? Rav said ??? son of ??? for him ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, who said ??? of silver to you ??? for me a woman ??? he has walked and who borrowed of gold one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ??? a place he to him If so, ??? for me ??? to him should bring himself ??? should bring himself Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found from the beginning also ??? it was. except Rabba said: I ??? R' Chiyya son of Avin: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? She ??? "Go!" ??? for me ??? who said for me ??? for me ??? of silver he has walked and gave to him ??? of gold one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ??? a place She to him And what does it mean when it says Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found that he came ??? Abayye said: Rabbi Shimon and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? all of them they both reason this way ??? a place he to him Rabbi Shimon this one of which we were speaking? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel For it was taught in a baraita

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.