It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נב,א גמרא

the one ??? one ??? and one ??? if ??? We do not bring out those particular ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? but: ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? No. that he came ??? Come and hear: for it teaches: ??? to this five children" and to this five the daughters of and he said One ??? to one ??? all One and one it requires five ??? did he die one from them all One and one it requires four ??? and chalitza ??? from them And if you would say So, here, ??? and in the end ??? this one One ??? to one ??? The tanna teaches: ??? of Raba ??? It once happened ??? Rav said Learn from this ??? four and and took Rav in his hands three Learn from this ??? And learn from this ??? It is not ??? even ??? From where can you derive When the baraita teaches ??? it was and of ??? it was The reason is ??? he this one ??? two ??? No. And learn from this a woman she was made ??? and even in a place ??? to it ??? And the other one Who is it ??? that do not ??? It is because of this: ??? for him If it was ??? If it was ??? For ??? R' Zeira he said about this teaching ??? in front of R' Yochanan He said to him: Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav thus This is only in the case did not say For didn't R' Yochanan say ??? and not ??? both ??? this on account of that is not are his and this on account of that is not ??? thus ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? or ??? a sela coin ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, or ??? a sela coin ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? of the world is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? How so? For example, ??? a sela coin ??? in it

דף נב,ב גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that Our mishna ??? and he said Rav It is not ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ??? this particular ??? that he was ??? is comparable he came There was this guy ??? to it he said to it ??? for me he came There was this guy in front of Raba he said ??? about this teaching For R' Shimon for he said: ??? you shall This certain individual ??? he came in front of Raba He said to him: one ??? and what case is he dealing with? ??? but: ??? He said to him: I ??? ??? For ??? This certain individual ??? he came Master ??? he found He said to him: why is it that No. ??? he came in front of Raba he said Watch out for leading vav And they did not say ??? next to ??? except in the matter of terumah only. as it is taught: How so? And they said separates terumah that did not have ??? its terumah terumah Behold! ??? field his fellow ??? and he separated terumah that did not have ??? if ??? It is because of this: ??? yes. its terumah terumah And if not, its terumah terumah And from where do we learn he was know if ??? It is because of this: ??? or not. Behold! the master of came the house and they found and he said to him ??? next to ??? if ??? from them its terumah terumah And if not, yes. its terumah terumah they were ??? whether like this or whether like that its terumah terumah But here, in this case, It is because of this: ??? he ??? It is not ???

דף נב,ב משנה

??? between The holiest of holy offerings between simple offerings It is not ??? two between ??? between ??? No. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says in error No. ??? with intent ??? with intent ??? and in error No. ??? These are the words of R' Meir Rabbi Yehudah says in error ??? with intent No. ???

דף נב,ב גמרא

Let him say Our mishna that is not like Rabbi Yosi the Gallilean as it is taught: (Lev. 5) ??? from by in Hashem. ??? simple offerings that are ??? these are the words of R' Yosi the Gallilean Even if you say R' Yosi the Gallilean and thus he comes to say R' Yosi the Gallilean ??? but: after ??? No. What is the reason? For ??? that is high ??? also where he teaches ??? between The holiest of holy offerings or whether simple offerings No. ??? The rabbis taught: after ??? of R' Meir He said to them: Rabbi Yehudah ??? to ??? his student Rabbi Meir ??? because of ??? are these and not to learn Torah are these shall come except ??? are these shall come ??? and he has entered He said to them: thus in the same way year" for me R' Meir ??? between The holiest of holy offerings or whether simple offerings No. ??? R' Yehudah upon them He said to them: No. thus in the same way Watch out for leading vav And I said to you to ??? because of ??? are these and not to learn Torah are these shall come except ??? are these shall come And so a woman in the courtyard from where do we learn he said R' Yosi they shall say ??? he lay down Yehudah ??? these are the words of Torah Just as shall be upon it And so yes. a person ??? in the courtyard And there is no meaning to the word a woman ??? to do to it ??? in the courtyard And furthermore, ??? What then does it mean when it says It was taught: R' Yehuda says: ??? R' Yosei says It is not ??? R' Yochanan said: both the written Torah one do they expound, (in Numbers 18) and this it shall be to you make kiddush. ??? from the fire R' Yehudah reasoned to you for all ??? and R' Yosi reasoned ??? Just as fire as regard to eating, Even he also as regard to eating, R' Yochanan said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.