It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

??? on all ??? of ??? and not ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use in error yes. ??? with intent ??? the priesthood that did not have ??? Because ??? of them on account of that did not have ??? Torah ??? Come and hear: ??? the priesthood ??? they are subject to the laws of misappropriation These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Is this not Even if No. ??? No. ??? Come and hear: ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? R' ??? R' Meir says they are subject to the laws of misappropriation Even ??? that he was Rabbi Meir says: they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? But why? Let him say Because ??? on account of that did not have ??? Torah ??? for it is the case that the wall of the city ??? they came For it was taught in a baraita the wall of the city ??? and all ??? the city have come ??? No. you say ??? except I would say R' Yehudah Come and hear: as it is taught: he said R' Yishmael son of Rabbi Isaac the stones of Jerusalem ??? at them." These are the words of Rabbi Meir. No. you say ??? except I would say R' Yehudah If it was R' Yehudah Jerusalem who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? R' Yehuda says: all One who says Jerusalem did not say anything And if you say It is because of this: that is not he said ??? For it was taught: R' Yehuda says: all One who says ??? did not say anything until ??? In the matter ???

דף נד,ב גמרא

it is a case of two different Tanaaim ??? and According to the opinion of R' Yehudah Ulla said in the name a thing ??? says he was ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use with intent ??? in error yes. ??? And they did not say in error ??? except in the matter of sacrifice only. And so based on this lit: from after, ??? sacrifice in what way he is obligated except For he came ??? in the name a thing ??? says he was ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use with intent ??? in error yes. ??? And they did not say in error ??? except in the matter of food only. Rav Nachman said Rav Adda bar Ahava said The halacha is like Rabbi Meir ??? Because ??? to us a Tanna taught: ??? "The halacha is like R' Yehudah ??? Because ??? to us a Tanna taught: ??? like Rabbi Meir ??? Who is it For it was taught in a baraita vineyard ??? the academy of Shammai say he (Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth) does not have And he does not have burning And the academy of Hillel say he has the academy of Shammai say he has creates an exclusion and he has ??? And the academy of Hillel say all of it ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? (Lev. 19) ??? (Lev. 27) ??? Just as tithe he has Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth and he has burning Even vineyard ??? he has Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth and he has burning and the academy of Shammai No. ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? like who they both reason this way If it was like R' Yehudah why is it that all of it ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't tithe say money or property ??? he except Is this not like Rabbi Meir like R' Yehudah ??? Who is it For it was taught in a baraita ??? in the hand of ??? and he remembered before it was even the case that they come next to ??? from by ??? and like R' Yehudah ??? who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: For it was taught in a mishna: ??? second tithe are his ??? upon it ??? between of his. between ??? to him as a gift with whom does it agree? Shall I say ??? She who ??? he will give for him as a gift For didn't tithe say money or property that is high he except Is this not R' Yehudah No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? but his thought is presentations that did not have ??? that did not have ??? Come and hear: ??? planted ??? are his ??? upon it ??? between of his. between ??? to him as a gift with whom does it agree? Shall I say ??? who ??? he will give for him Hey, isn't it the case that ??? except Is this not R' Yehudah In reality lit: In the world ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? that is not like R' Yosi for he said: ??? is forbidden because it was ??? Come and hear: ??? from him tithe ??? and not ??? until ??? in two, he gives a sela coin ??? and second tithe are his with whom does it agree? Shall I say ??? why is it that ??? (Lev. 27) and gave ??? and he stood to him the Merciful One in the Torah says except Is this not R' Yehudah In reality lit: In the world R' Yehudah and here in this other case, one ??? and here in this other case, two ??? and if ??? What do I have to learn from one ??? What do I have to learn from two ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said The halacha is ??? Because and we have learnt in a Mishna: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.