It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נט,א גמרא

and why is it different there, where he teaches One who says ??? Here in this case, ??? Come and learn from this. and there in that case ??? Come and learn from this. Here in this case, ??? Come and learn from this. For if it was a Tanna taught: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? he that there is a swindler ??? reasoned a slave for me ??? but: his fellow that is not ??? I would say No. ??? a swindler there i.e., in another mishna ??? Come and learn from this. For if it was a Tanna taught: One who says to his fellow then I might incorrectly say: his fellow he and so when ??? in a place after It is not ??? No. ??? but: ??? I would say ??? a place he to him Come and learn from this. ??? the Chasid: Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? for him ??? for his own sake For it was taught: Just as the one who did ??? except ??? in it ??? No. ??? It was necessary for him ??? reasoned Meanwhile, he came ??? other than this make kiddush. to it Rabbah son of son of ??? he will give for him ??? for Rav, he said ??? for this the land He went ??? for his own sake For it was taught: Just as the one who did ??? except ??? in it ??? it was. for him for Rav, ??? of him. honor ??? son of son of ??? No. ??? of him. honor It was necessary for him ??? reasoned Meanwhile, he came ??? other than this ??? to it Rav ??? it was. ??? the land He went Rabbi Abba ??? He went Rav ??? to Rabbi Zeira He went Rabbi Zeira ??? for Rav, Isaac ??? He said to him: Wait until ??? For ??? he found He said to him: Responded ??? and someone else came and took it away lit: and picked it up from him What then does it mean when it says He said to him: is called a wicked person So rather, Master, What is the reason? did thus He said to him It was not ??? now also ??? Master, He said to him ??? No. ??? to it ??? the first She and not ??? the validity If it was he is required as a gift ??? Rav ??? No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down to it As it is written (Prov. 15) ??? presentations ??? Rabbi Abba No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down to it It is because of this: ??? of it Rav ??? No. Master, Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down to it and not Master, Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down to it ??? the land ??? and thus One who says ??? for me ??? does not come after ??? in the midst of thirty What then? Rav And for Shmuel who both say ??? And even though ??? What is the reason? Behold! ??? No. to the lender ??? and not ??? No. ??? and Behold! ??? to the lender also No. ??? Behold! ??? does not come after ??? of it What then? R' Yochanan said: ??? will come ??? nullify ??? he said It is not ??? No. will come ??? nullify ??? R' Yochanan ??? he nullifies if before it was even the case that he separated terumah he nullifies yes. its terumah terumah Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? he ??? nullify ??? that I ??? coins ??? a woman and so when It once happened ??? and not will come ??? nullify It once happened ??? writ ??? and they come ??? or ??? after him: ??? and he said to him writ ??? to you wasted he Behold! this wasted Hey, isn't it the case that ??? writ ??? and so when ??? coins ??? a woman he is equivalent. And we have learned Behold! this wasted there i.e., in another mishna also all how much it had not arrived ??? he will come ??? nullify ??? Reish Lakish: to R' Yochanan all the vessels ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? something ??? except ??? It once happened

דף נט,ב גמרא

It once happened sent forth immediately It once happened immediately ??? yes. ??? No. immediately It once happened and not immediately ??? This is satisfactory immediately It once happened No. ??? that is not will come ??? nullify It once happened except immediately ??? from this ??? that I ??? and so when It once happened he is equivalent. And it is like Rav ??? of Rav ??? pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Lev. 11) For He shall give" and we recite For ??? How so? For ??? is equivalent and so when He shall give" Just as He shall give" ??? for him Even ??? for him Rav ??? he would say over about this teaching that he brought to this other teaching and thus She that was given is a voluntary act ??? and the halacha is She ??? herself if of it ??? and if of ??? yes. ??? No. ??? herself ??? of it What then? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? and Reish Lakish: he said It is not ??? R' Yochanan said: ??? will come ??? nullify ??? Reish Lakish: he said It is not ??? No. will come ??? nullify ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? he nullifies if before it was even the case that he separated terumah he nullifies yes. its terumah terumah Rabba said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? the master of the house and he separated terumah ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected It once happened ??? all the vessels they must descend to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? And there is no meaning to the word we go up ??? except ??? It once happened It once happened sent forth immediately It once happened immediately ??? It is not ??? No. immediately It once happened and not immediately ??? This is satisfactory immediately It once happened No. ??? No. will come ??? nullify It once happened except immediately ??? from this ??? He said to him that I ??? and so when It once happened he is equivalent. And it is like Rav ??? of Rav ??? pointed out a contradiction. it is written For He shall give" and we recite For ??? How so? For ??? is equivalent ??? Just as He shall give" ??? for him Even ??? also ??? for him ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? writ ??? and they come ??? or ??? after him: ??? and he said to him writ ??? to you wasted he Behold! this wasted ??? and even ??? and even though That there are to say that I ??? coins ??? a woman ??? he is equivalent. even thus will come ??? nullify ??? it is a problem ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? like Rabbi Yochanan ??? to us ??? them What then? ??? in it Rav ??? he said he returns ??? in it Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said he does not return ??? in it ??? to us ??? of Rav ??? writ No. ??? Rav said ??? for two In reality lit: In the world And Shmuel said ??? for two until ??? day after ??? day ??? two ??? Rav Chisdah sat ??? has a problem ??? two in what way ??? He said to him: Rav Yosef Master, He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he would say over to it and has a problem Rav Yehudah ??? he would say over to it And there is no difficulty. for him ??? and after thirty day and etc. Rav said ??? It is not ??? In reality lit: In the world And Shmuel said ??? It is not ??? except until ??? day after ??? two ??? for Rav, from doubt for him If it was ??? If it was ??? This is obvious to him. ??? as it is taught: ??? and after death writ and does not writ these are the words of the sages Rabbi says ??? writ And let him say Rav The halacha is ??? And let him say Shmuel The halacha is like Rabbi Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For this Rav said The halacha is ??? then I might incorrectly say: there i.e., in another mishna ??? But here, in this case, ??? I would say give thanks for him ??? and if Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi then I might incorrectly say: there i.e., in another mishna he ??? writ after death But here, in this case, ??? after ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him for Rav, Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Abayye said: and with his reasoning of Rav came one and he said to it Behold! ??? for me ??? and after ??? day and someone else came and he said to it Behold! ??? for me ??? and after twenty day

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.