It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סב,א גמרא

??? Rabba said: ??? bread ??? As Mar said: bread ??? with salt ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi ??? son of ??? it is written (Num. 5) if No. he lay down a man ??? and if No. ??? under ??? except to Rabbi Meir ??? should bring himself Watch out for leading vav And R' Tanchum said ??? it is written This is satisfactory to R' ??? it is written ??? except to Rabbi ??? why do I have It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: if No. he lay down a man ??? and if he lay down No. ??? and not ??? except ??? in reality Come and learn from this. This is satisfactory to Rabbi Meir it is written (Num. 19) he ??? on that very day ??? by day ??? Watch out for leading vav "veyithar" and if No. ??? etc. except to Rabbi ??? why do I have It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: the commandments ??? on the third ??? in a case ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? a slave Come and learn from this. (Num. 19) ??? on ??? on the third day by day ??? why do I have It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: the third ??? two ??? that he came ??? in the days of ??? but: in a case ??? on the third ??? that he came ??? in the days of ??? I would say it is of acceptable worth. Come and learn from this. (Num. 19) ??? by day ??? why do I have It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: What case is he dealing with? ??? but: ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. also ??? Come and learn from this.

דף סב,א משנה

??? the his wife and he said ??? I was that it ??? Consider this case: She ??? Consider this case: She ??? Consider this case: She ??? Consider this case: She ??? Behold! This is ??? because of that did not have of causing him error i.e., of tricking him One who says ??? Behold! ??? for me after ??? or after ??? after ??? or after ??? after ??? or after ??? after ??? It is not ??? and thus One who says to his fellow if she gave birth to your wife female Behold! This is ??? for me It is not ??? it was ??? his fellow preganant ??? his words ??? and if she gave birth to female ???

דף סב,א גמרא

It was taught there: yes. ??? from ??? on ??? and if he separated terumah yes. its terumah terumah (Rav Assi asked it of R' Yochanan) brought this very question he said fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? What then? He said to him all ??? Is this not ??? It once happened he is equivalent. ??? One who says ??? Behold! ??? for me after ??? after ??? after ??? after ??? after ??? after ??? after ??? It is not ??? This is satisfactory all of them Is this not in his hand except ??? you shall in his hand ??? also Is this not in his hand for he said: Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba R' Yochanan said:

דף סב,ב גמרא

??? It is necessary for him three What is the reason מאי טעמא (Lev. 24) statute" it is written of him. ??? who ??? for him Behold! three He disagreed with this R' Abba -- son of ??? Except I can object with text from here: who gives ??? and he said Behold! ??? for me after ??? So, here, where they did ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna from the beginning livestock now the understanding of ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: R' Oshaia who gives ??? and he said to it Behold! ??? for me after ??? It is not ??? So, here, to R' Yochanan where they did ??? in his hand ??? who seeks Rav Oshaya: who gives two ??? in one he said to it ??? for me the day and in one he said to it ??? for me after ??? that is not are they, ??? Perhaps so that thus it will be ??? now ??? also after thus It was taught: ??? of Rabbi Yochanan yes. ??? from ??? on ??? and if he separated terumah yes. its terumah terumah How so? he said fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? did not say anything but: he said ??? his words ??? because of this Thus said Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov even he said fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? terumah on fruits ??? -- this refers to ??? and they brought ??? his words ??? Rabbah said No. Thus said Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov except when he destroyed but: ??? No. Rav Yosef said: even ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? That this ??? he ??? For scripture said: (Is. 58) ??? his head like who ??? this one that teaches One who says to his fellow if she gave birth to your wife female ??? for me did not say anything and Rabbi Chanina said: They did not teach such a ruling except that do not his wife preganant but: his wife preganant his words ??? like who Whether you interpret it like Rabbah ??? If it was ??? Joseph despite the fact that did not have ??? and there are that they said Rabbah said No. Thus said Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov except when he destroyed of the academy of ??? but: when he destroyed of the academy of ??? No. Rav Yosef said: even when he destroyed of the academy of ??? like who ??? this one that teaches One who says to his fellow if she gave birth to your wife female ??? for me did not say anything and he said Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except that do not his wife preganant but: his wife preganant his words ??? like who ??? and the words of all are Abayye said: Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov And Rabbi and Rabbi Meir all of them they both reason this way a person ??? Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov this one of which we were speaking? Rabbi as it is taught:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.