Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף סח,א גמרא
even a menstruant also Why is it that Abayye said: Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? and on ??? that do not ??? a mamzer he said Hezekiyah said: he read (Lev. 15) and she became ??? upon it even in the hour of ??? shall be of it ??? that it is possible ??? and there are ??? a woman What then does it mean when it says ??? them ??? a woman ??? Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said We come to compare ??? for just as ??? that it ??? No. ??? of it ??? is it not all the more so? If so, the remainder of ??? also Rav Pappa said: ??? clearly and explicitly it is written in them? (Deut. 21) For ??? two women ??? And so there are ??? before the place ??? before the place except ??? and he said the Merciful One For ??? and Rabbi Akivah for he said: yes. ??? For ??? in what way ??? as it is taught: Rabbi ??? says from The entirety he was Rabbi Akiva makes a mamzer except ??? The greatness for behold! he said Torah (Lev. 21) No. ??? makes And there is no meaning to the word makes ??? to R' ??? for he said: ??? on ??? son of Joseph that he was says all that do not to him ??? a mamzer This is satistfactory to R' ??? If it was To exclude ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If it was The reason is ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: And even if ??? One who acts in what way ??? to it ??? and what is the difference here, It is because of this: that there is for him One who acts that do not the value of in all And the rabbbis ??? to it ??? One who acts Behold! ??? One who acts in what way ??? If it was ??? If it was One ??? and one ??? two women ??? one in the case of If it's about an elevation-offering, ??? The greatness Is it written ??? and Rabbi Akiva the master of ??? that there is ??? and all who that it does not have upon it ??? a maidservant ??? From where do we derive this? Rav Huna said Scripture states: (Gen. 22) ??? to you "Here is with ??? with ??? that is not ??? of it ???
דף סח,ב גמרא
??? From where do we derive this? For scripture said: (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states: (Deut. 7) No. ??? with them." ??? that is not ??? of it ??? From where do we derive this? that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai For scripture said: (Deut. 7) For ??? ??? that comes ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? that comes from some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? except he built Ravina said Learn from this son of ??? that comes from ??? Let him say his reasoning is Ravina some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and a slave that comes on A daughter of Israel ??? a mamzer ??? shall not be a mamzer shall not be is invalid, ??? This certain individual in the week the nations it is written the remainder of the nations of From where do we derive this? ??? For ??? ??? all ??? This is satistfactory ??? who derives an explanation from The reason is ??? except According to the sages, What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? (Deut. 21) and after thus ??? etc. from this general principle it would follow originally No. ??? of it ??? that is not ??? of it ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states: (Deut. 21) For ??? to him all in a case ??? of him. For ??? we recite of him. ??? to him and all in a case that is not we recite of him. For ??? No. we recite of him. ??? to him If so, a maidservant also yes. Here, too, except the his wife ??? why do I have to account for that which was taught
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.