It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סט,א גמרא

One who says ??? Behold! the daughter of ??? a slave ??? these are the words of R' Yosi the Gallilean but the sages say his words ??? It is because of this: as it is said (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabba said: ??? the Gallilean

דף סט,א משנה

R' Tarfon says it is possible for them ??? How so? a mamzer ??? a maidservant ??? a slave ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? son of ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: Behold! this a slave a mamzer

דף סט,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: Rabbi ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: or once it has been done he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Come and hear: They said to him: to Rabbi ??? ??? and not ??? ??? And if you say ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? also ??? a slave he (have pity) does not have Come and hear: ??? of Rabbi ??? a mamzer it was. He said to him: If it was ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, once it has been done What then does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? He said to him: ??? he steals and it sold ??? and with two For R' ??? a Hebrew male slave who it was. For didn't Master, say yes. a Hebrew male slave accustomed except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed except Is this not Learn from this Rabbi ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Learn from this Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: Behold! this a slave ??? R' Eliezer said What is his reason of Rabbi Eliezer For scripture said: (Deut. 23) to him he has walked after ??? And the rabbbis This certain individual ??? You might have thought that I would say that (Num. 4) ??? it is written he came to him ??? and Rabbi Eliezer Is it not the case that this is so even though ??? he came to him ??? Here in this case, also, Even atop על גבי As it is written (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? he came to him ??? And the rabbbis all ??? a maidservant ??? livestock he is equivalent.

דף סט,א משנה

ten ??? if they put it up on the altar ??? ??? are permitted in going this to that ??? are permitted in going this to that ??? all of them are permitted in going this to that and these are ??? Any thing that was ??? of its mother and does not ??? his father ??? all ??? from ??? and does not ??? not his father and not of its mother Abba the grave he was reads ???

דף סט,א גמרא

ten ??? if they put it up on the altar ??? What is the purpose of teaching: if they put it up on the altar ??? Israel the validity ??? Come and learn from this. As it is taught: (Deut. 17) ??? to the place who ??? Hashem your God This teaches ??? that is high from all the Land of Israel and the Land of Israel that is high from all the lands This is satisfactory the house of ??? that is high from all the Land of Israel it is written

דף סט,ב גמרא

(Deut. 17) these are the words of ??? except the Land of Israel that is high from all lands From where do we derive this? As it is written (Jer. 23) ??? there are days shall come says Hashem" he does not say any more the living God ??? who raised up the Children of Israel from the land of Egypt but instead the living God ??? who raised up and what brought the Children of Israel from the land of north and from all the lands who they were scattered ??? there What is the purpose of teaching: if they put it up on the altar ??? if they put it up on the altar ??? Israel That would be a support to him. To whose position? to Rabbi ??? for he said: R' Elazar No. He ascended Ezra ??? until that was made ??? He ascended it was said: Abaye said if they put it up on the altar ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: And Rabba said ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: and what they disagree about ??? For Rabbi Eliezer said: No. He ascended Ezra ??? until that was made ??? He ascended Abaye he does not have of Rabbi ??? Raba it has of Rabbi ??? If you wish, I would say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them of Rabbi ??? and here in this other case, In this case, ??? one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that the master of ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: if they put it up on the altar we were for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said all lands ??? Israel and the Land of Israel ??? except ??? to this some ??? No. ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: if they put it up on the altar it is written (Ezra 8) ??? to ??? that comes on the brother ??? in that place days three ??? Levi No. ??? in that place except for one for he said: ??? this one ??? No. ??? From where do we derive this? ??? As it is written (Ezra 2) ??? the priests. ??? and from the nation ??? and all Israel ??? From where do we derive this? as it is taught: R' Yosei says that is large ??? as it is said (Ezra 2) ??? the priests. My son, ??? My son, ??? My son, ??? who ??? a woman and he reads on their names ??? they sought ??? and not ??? from ??? and he said ??? to them who No. ??? make kiddush. ??? until ??? a priest ??? and there were twins and He said to them: Behold! "You ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? Even here, also ??? and for one for he said: ??? Behold! ??? from terumah they came ??? It is different there in that case ??? and Rather, what can we conclude? that is large ??? originally ??? from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis and in the end ??? from terumah a law established by the Torah And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world now also ??? No. ??? And so ??? according to Torah law, According to Rabbinic law, No. ??? If so, What then does it mean when it says that is large ??? originally there is not in this case. ??? It is because of this: terumah a law established by the Torah in the end Even atop על גבי That there are ??? It is because of this: terumah a law established by the Torah ??? No. ??? For it is written (Ezra 2) and he said ??? to them who No. ??? make kiddush. ??? he that is not shall eat this one All things ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. something ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use and not something ??? holy offerings No. something ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use As it is written (Lev. 22) and all ??? does not eat and that which was sanctified for Temple use and not something ??? holy offerings For scripture said: (Lev. 22) the daughter of a priest For ??? She ??? It may not be eaten and Mar said: ??? from ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.