It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עז,א משנה

the daughter of ??? male, is invalid from ??? In reality lit: In the world Israel ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? into the priesthood ??? A daughter of Israel Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid into the priesthood Rabbi Yehudah says the daughter of ??? male, ??? male, Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says Israel ??? female convert Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? into the priesthood ??? A daughter of Israel Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? into the priesthood but: ??? female convert Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid into the priesthood one ??? and one slaves ??? Even if until ??? until that it should be of its mother from Israel R' Yosei says Even ??? female convert Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? into the priesthood

דף עז,א גמרא

Watch out for leading vav And what do we mean by "always"? What would you have said? something ??? Just as there after three ??? Even here, also after three ??? Israel ??? From where do we derive this? R' Yochanan said: It is because of this: R' Shimon it is said here, (Lev. 21) and not ??? and it is said there (Lev. 21) No. ??? the master of ??? Just as there ??? and not ??? Even here, ??? and not ??? Except I can object with text from here: Watch out for leading vav or his daughter of ??? Is it written his son ??? it is written No. ??? the daughter of his son ??? it is written No. ??? There is an analogy between ??? to him Just as he Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid Even his son Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid the daughter of Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? If so, ??? the value of What then does it mean when it says ??? A daughter of Israel Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere But the beginning of the teaching, the daughter of ??? male, is invalid from ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? But the beginning of the teaching, Israel ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? A daughter of Israel Our mishna that is not like Rabbi ??? son of Yehudah as it is taught: Rabbi ??? son of Yehudah says in the same way ??? Israel ??? thus in the same way the daughters of Israel ??? What is his reason For R' ??? Yehudah Scripture states: No. ??? one he ??? with two ??? he does not ??? The rabbis taught: No. ??? yes. for me except ??? She herself from where do we learn is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? Just as ??? that did not have he crossed transgression ??? She ??? transgression is it not logical ??? should it itself He corrects that which is in the past transgression And there is no meaning to the word ??? Just as ??? which provides yes. ??? in any place shall you say ??? and if your soul to say Scripture states: No. ??? No. ??? this that he was is valid ??? What then does it mean when it says if your soul to say And if you say that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? Scripture states: No. ??? No. ??? this that he was is valid ??? The rabbis taught: What is an example of one ??? all that was born from ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? to him Behold! he turns ??? to him ??? are proper as it is written (Deut. 24) an abomination She She an abomination And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rav Yehudah said thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What is an example of one ??? all that was born from is invalid, the priesthood ??? yes. No. ??? No. Behold! a widow and a divorcee ??? that is not ??? Rabbah said This is what he means: What is ??? that did not have he was to it ??? A general principle: all that was born from is invalid, the priesthood What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav said Isaac son of Avin: This is what he means: What is an example of one ??? in words of Torah and It is not necessary for them ??? in words of ??? all that was born from invalid as regarding the priesthood The Rabbis taught a widow a widow a widow he is not liable except One a divorcee a divorcee a divorcee he is not liable except One (Lev. 21) a widow and a divorcee ??? at a time in a case when they ??? he is liable on all One and one ??? he is not liable except One Mar said: a widow a widow a widow he is not liable except One This a widow How so? Shall I say who has sex with widow of Reuben? and on widow of Shimon and on widow of Levi why is it that he is not liable except One

דף עז,ב גמרא

Behold! ??? Behold! desolations ??? except who has sex with a widow One three ??? How so? If it was that is not ??? of him. This is obvious! ??? he is liable except One except ??? of him. he ate one and one why is it that he is not liable except One For it was taught in a mishna: a Nazir that he was drink wine all the day all of it he is not liable except One They said to him: to ??? to ??? This is only in the case drink he is liable on all One and one it is not necessary to teach this who has sex with widow of Reuben? ??? widow of Shimon ??? widow of Levi What would you have said? Behold! desolations ??? Come and learn from this. ??? in the case of there is not in this case. (Lev. 21) a widow and a divorcee ??? This a Tanna taught: What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is prohibits ??? on prohibits ??? also And if his reasoning is yes. prohibits ??? on prohibits even ??? also did not say Raba This a Tanna taught: prohibits ??? on prohibits he does not have prohibits ??? it has a widow forbidden ??? The greatness ??? to it a divorcee ??? to it ??? to join with the body of a priest ??? to it ??? to join with the body of the high priest ??? from terumah ??? to it ??? from terumah ??? to join with the body of the high priest except ??? What then does it mean when it says prohibits ??? of it Rav said ??? son of Rav ??? Because in that place ??? invalidates it ??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? Any thing that was (Lev. 21) ??? Behold! he (Lev. 21) without ??? all that is not ??? he does not without ??? creates an exclusion ??? The greatness who has sex with ??? a widow He said to him: Who said this to you? R' Shimon She for he said: yes. prohibits ??? on prohibits as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: One who eats roadkill by day ??? is exempt For if it was rabbis this one They said: prohibits ??? on prohibits Even if you say rabbis For They said: rabbis prohibits ??? on prohibits that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי prohibits a donkey on prohibits ??? but: prohibits ??? on prohibits a donkey No. ??? that it is possible that they said So, with whom does it agree? It is the rabbis' position that they said prohibits ??? on prohibits And so They said: rabbis prohibits ??? on prohibits What case is he dealing with? prohibits a donkey on prohibits ??? but: prohibits ??? on prohibits a donkey No. ??? For if it was Rabbi Shimon now prohibits a donkey on prohibits ??? No. ??? prohibits ??? on prohibits a donkey ??? What would you have said? prohibits the priesthood that I Come and learn from this. He said to him: Rav ??? Israel that comes on ??? to it ??? to it or No. ??? to it who say ??? is it not all the more so? or perhaps, yes. ??? except ??? the priesthood He said to him: yes. ??? except ??? the priesthood only. Rabba said: ??? this one the validity ??? rabbis yes. ??? except ??? the priesthood as it is taught: he does not say a divorcee ??? The greatness ??? and I I thought to say now ??? forbidden ??? The greatness ??? For what reason ??? in the same way ??? a divorcee ??? thus in the same way ??? The greatness This is obvious! ??? except in the same way ??? a divorcee ??? thus in the same way a widow ??? The greatness ??? For what reason ??? yes. ??? except ??? the priesthood ??? For what reason ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as here, ??? Those who are ill Even there ??? Those who are ill Rav Ashi said ??? a priest that comes on ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.