It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

??? to it ??? No. ??? to it came had a vision upon it it was made ??? Rav Yehudah said the high priest ??? two One It is because of this: (Lev. 21) No. ??? and one It is because of this: (Lev. 21) No. ??? also It is because of this: (Lev. 21) No. ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba a widow and a divorcee ??? It is because of this: two desolations Is this not two desolations And naught else No. two desolations on this and a second person desolations on this If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, a divorcee or a chalutzah he is not liable except on One This is what he means: he is not liable except on One And really two desolations or a chalutzah is a law established by the Rabbis For it was taught: a divorcee yes. for me except a divorcee Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: and the woman According to Rabbinic law, and he read ??? in reality Abayye said: ??? the master of ??? It is because of this: No. ??? the master of ??? It is because of this: No. ??? Rava said: the master of ??? No. the master of he does not ??? It is because of this: As it is written No. ??? and not ??? What is the reason? No. ??? It is because of this: No. ??? give thanks Abaye ??? and not the master of that is not ??? (Deut. 24) ??? to be to him ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says And that is absent here give thanks Raba ??? The greatness ??? the master of and not ??? and not ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Consider this case: he ??? and both of them, "We thank..." ??? the master of and not ??? that is not ??? a way ??? Rabbi Yehudah says the daughter of ??? male, ??? It was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says the daughter of ??? male, ??? male, and justice. he gives Just as ??? ??? came is valid Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid ??? ??? came is invalid is it not logical ??? is invalid Just as ??? which provides ??? the high priest ??? He corrects that do not ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter is invalid Just as ??? The greatness ??? which provides ??? He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them those that are not ??? Even I ??? ??? that is not ??? or his daughter is invalid Just as ??? regarding them which provides there are at them." trapping of transgression No. you say the high priest ??? He corrects except I would say ??? He corrects Just as ??? which provides he does not ??? in going in the congregation of ??? He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them those that are not ??? or his daughter is invalid Even I ??? ??? that is not ??? or his daughter is invalid Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? And Rabbi Yehudah ??? also invalidates it ??? to it a bamah an elevated place for offerings. the trapping of ??? R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov says ??? It was taught: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says female convert ??? three years and one day is valid into the priesthood as it is said (Num. 31) and all ??? to you Is it not the case that Pinchas he was with them And the rabbbis ??? to you ??? and all of them the written Torah one do they expound, (Ezek. 44) a widow and a divorcee No. they took to them ??? but instead ??? the house of Israel Rabbi Yehudah reasoned until for there is all seed from Israel Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov reasoned ??? and even a small portion of seed Rabbi Yosei reasoned who ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? reasoned who ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Raba

דף עח,ב גמרא

This he read But the beginning of the teaching, ??? The greatness and at the end of the teaching, ??? He said to him: yes. "and the writing of he read Thus said for him yes. As it is written (I Sam 3) and lamp God ??? And for Shmuel who lay ??? Hashem Is it not the case that There is no sitting in the Courtyard except for the kings of the House of David alone except lamp God ??? Hashem And for Shmuel who lay in his place (Ezek. 44) and the widow who ??? a widow ??? they took ??? yes. from Israel No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? they took ??? priests they took Another teaching is like this: ??? they took ??? priests they took Rabbi Yehudah says from ??? into the priesthood they took Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: the daughter of ??? male, ??? male, all that you ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter you ??? and all ??? you ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter If it was you ??? R' Yosei says Even ??? Rav Hamnunah said in the name because of Ulla The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi and thus Rabbah bar bar Channah said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi From the day that the house of was destroyed ??? priests ??? like Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov Rav Nachman said He said to me: ??? came ??? to him like Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov exalted. yes. ??? it from him like Rabbi Yosi

דף עח,ב משנה

One who says My son, this a mamzer he does not faithfully and even both "We thank..." on who transgress ??? a mamzer he ??? they are believed Rabbi Yehudah says they are believed

דף עח,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says and even both No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? that is not ??? for him except even ??? to it No. ??? and not ??? in a case is what he has ??? that is not ??? except even transgresses also the one who does not have ??? No. ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? As it is taught: (Deut. 21) ??? to others from here Rabbi Yehuda said A person is believed to say this My son, first-born and in the same way ??? a person to say this My son, first-born thus in the same way A person is believed to say this son of a divorcee and this son of Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah But the sages say: he does not faithfully He said to him: Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak to Raba This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yehudah it is written ??? except According to the sages, ??? why do I have ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion (Deut. 21) to place to him the mouth of two This is obvious! why do I have he read ??? So if he wished, ??? for him gifts who No. ??? for him ??? after ??? and to Rabbi Meir for he said: a person ??? a thing that did not have came In reality lit: In the world ??? why do I have ??? to him ???

דף עח,ב משנה

who ??? is a voluntary act ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter he has walked he ??? if are his ??? and if of ??? and if he does not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.