It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עט,א משנה

both they give writ and if ??? one he gives writ and one one who has married and thus the his wife that was given is a voluntary act ??? and the halacha is ??? herself if of it ??? and if of ??? and if are not ??? both they give to it writ and if ??? one he gives to it writ and one one who has married

דף עט,א גמרא

And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard regarding that are his It is because of this: ??? for him ??? but: ??? that is not ??? to it ??? I would say No. ??? and if we had heard regarding ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say No. ??? for him Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements it was said: ??? on the way ??? herself in the city Consider this case: She ??? Rav said: Behold! She ??? before us And Shmuel said there is a fear of them. ??? both begins ??? Shall I say in the midst of Six In this case, Let him say Rav Behold! She ??? before us now he ??? except after Six In this case, Let him say Shmuel there is a fear of them. ??? both for this statement that Shmuel said poses a contradiction: There is no difference between ??? except Six months only. it is not necessary to teach this ??? day ??? Six Rav said: Behold! She ??? before us ??? also ??? And Shmuel said now he ??? And for Shmuel what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? and it is found lacking all ??? atop it at the end of eating, before they leave between in a private domain between in a public domain ??? It is different there in that case That there are to say ??? tamei on ??? and I will say No. he immersed ??? on ??? and I will say No. lacking Behold! lacking before you Here in this case, also, Behold! ??? before you now he ??? there i.e., in another mishna also now he ??? there i.e., in another mishna both ??? Here in this case, one ??? And for Shmuel what is the difference here, ??? as it is taught: he was ??? ??? upon it terumah and brought and after this ??? vinegar all three days certainly ??? doubt whether ??? What is the difference ??? certainly and What is the difference ??? doubt whether And Rav says ??? Which Tanna taught: ??? Rabbi Shimon She ??? also doubt ??? as it is taught: all ??? atop it at the end of eating, before they leave between in a private domain between in a public domain ??? and Rabbi Shimon says: in a public domain ??? in a private domain ??? but: According to the sages, he immersed at the end of eating, before they leave It is different there in that case That there are to say ??? he immersed on ??? and I will say No. ??? wine on ??? and I will say No. ??? Behold! ??? before you Here in this case, also, Behold! She ??? before us now he ??? also now he ??? there i.e., in another mishna both ??? Here in this case, one ??? he That there are Let him say ???

דף עט,ב גמרא

who sent forth immediately who he sent forth ??? without proof there are. yes. ??? without proof these are the words of R' Ya'akov Rabbi Natan says if ??? he upon it ??? proof that he was ??? and if ??? he upon them ??? proof ??? he was Let him say Rav for he said: like Rabbi he gave And for Shmuel for he said: ??? Ya'akov Rav would say to you I that they said even like Rabbi Ya'akov Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Ya'akov there i.e., in another mishna That there are to say ??? money or property on ??? But here, in this case, who Let him say ??? on ??? And Shmuel said I that they said even to Rabbi he gave Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Natan there i.e., in another mishna everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world of a presumption that ??? they stand one that he came ??? you shall upon it ??? proof But here, in this case, does anyone lit., who comes to ??? Let him say ??? on the way ??? herself in the city Consider this case: She ??? a Tanna taught: one Behold! She ??? before us And another teaching there is a fear of them. ??? both Is this not one ??? and one ??? No. This and this ??? here, ??? here, ??? And let him say ??? does not disagree ??? also does not disagree ??? this one Rav Yosef the son of of Rav ??? a slave ??? of Rav ??? Shmuel and he said ??? for him ??? and that one According to Rabbinic law, ??? for him ??? Rabbah and if You might have thought does not disagree why is it that ??? perhaps, For a slave ??? He said to him: Mar Zutra to Rav Ashi Thus said Ameimar ??? of Shmuel and Rav Ashi said: ??? of Rav ??? of Rav

דף עט,ב משנה

who that went out he and the wife lit. his wife ??? came he and the wife lit. his wife and his children and he said a woman that she went out with me" ??? the sea Behold! She -- this refers to and these ??? it is not necessary ??? proof Not on the his wife and not on ??? and these ??? sends proof on ??? and does not sends proof on the his wife a woman ??? the sea Behold! She -- this refers to and these ??? sends proof on the his wife and it is not necessary ??? proof on ??? and these ??? It is necessary for him ??? proof on the his wife and on ???

דף עט,ב גמרא

Rabbah said son of Rav Huna and all of them ??? The rabbis taught: a woman ??? the sea sends proof on the his wife and it is not necessary ??? proof on ??? and sends proof on who were adults and it is not necessary ??? proof on who were minors Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? One but: ??? women sends proof on the his wife and on ??? on who were adults and on who were minors Raysh Lakish said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.