It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ח,א גמרא

Even the value of silver also ??? Rav Yosef said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: (Lev. 25) ??? By means of money he is acquired and does not is acquired ??? and vessels This ??? and vessels How so? Shall I say that is not ??? in them? A general principle: (Lev. 25) ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? the value of silver ??? and if ??? in them? the value of ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? and vessels Even if silver also except Is this not for there is in them? the value of ??? And because of the fact that is not ??? No. And the other one This is what he means: ??? silver he is acquired And there is no meaning to the word is acquired ??? and vessels And what does it mean when it says ??? and for Rav, ??? for he said: fruits No. my slave ??? What is there to say? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? in them? the value of ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? and vessels Even if silver also No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? silver For if it was is in it the value of ??? yes. If it was No. No. but: ??? and vessels I would say ??? Come and hear from this Rav Yosef said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: ??? this ??? My son, ??? this ??? My son, did not say anything ??? this ??? My son, ??? -- this refers to ??? My son, his son ??? This redemption How so? Shall I say that is not ??? all ??? except Is this not Even though it will be ??? And because of the fact that is not ??? No. No. In reality lit: In the world that is not ??? For example, ??? a priest ??? This is like of Rav ??? redemption ??? He said to him: To me Look, for me ??? Rav Ashi said They did not say that except in a case For example, Rav Kahana ??? Rabbah he and he had asked for him ??? but: the whole world No. This is like ??? son of Rav Ashi ??? of Rabbah ??? ten ??? Rabbi Eliezer said ??? for me ??? and gave to it ??? Behold! This is ??? he makes it up What is the reason? immediately for he said: to it a maneh worth one hundred dinars He gave to it ??? like who for he said: to it in order he is equivalent. Rav Huna said Rav said all One who says ??? he is equivalent. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? for me ??? and it was the case that ??? and brought and running one from them ??? even ??? freedom in his hand Here in this case, with what are we dealing? for he said: ??? -- this refers to this one ??? -- this refers to But the beginning of the teaching, ??? that he came It was taught by at the end of the teaching, he said to it ??? for me ??? -- this refers to and it is found a maneh worth one hundred dinars lacking ??? or ??? of ??? It is not ??? evil" Behold! This is ??? No. But the beginning of the teaching, and at the end of the teaching, for he said: ??? -- this refers to ??? running one from them ??? Even if ??? freedom in his hand How so? For example, he said: to it ??? -- this refers to and Here, too, ??? For if it was ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? now ??? No. are they, ??? -- this refers to ??? If it was It is because of this: this one No. ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, that did not have shall you say But the beginning of the teaching, ??? -- this refers to but: ??? are they, ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, ??? -- this refers to from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? and even thus No. are they, ??? Rav Ashi said: ??? and brought that I ??? This ??? of ??? How so? If it was ??? of him. this one ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? So, too, ??? for him between ??? This ??? evil" How so? If it was that is not he departs we were ??? of ??? Rav Pappa said: For example, ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? Rabba said: Rav Nachman said he said to it ??? for me ??? to it ??? upon it It is not ???

דף ח,ב גמרא

a maneh worth one hundred dinars yes. here, ??? yes. here, ??? Raba for Rav, ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Isaac for he said: Rabbi Isaac from where do we learn ??? obligation who acquires ??? as it is said (Deut. 24) to you ??? justice if he does not he acquires justice from where do we learn from here ??? obligation who acquires ??? My son, Rav Huna son of Avin: ??? this particular ??? No. are they, ??? upon it ??? ??? went up they came in front of Rabbi Ami He said to them ??? yes. here, ??? yes. here, The Rabbis taught ??? for me ??? to the sea or ??? or in every matter. ??? It is not ??? this one ??? in front are they, ??? this one ??? for him ??? No. ??? No. ??? he said No. ??? in front that is not are they, ??? but: ??? to the sea or ??? I would say immediately ??? in them? ??? made kiddush, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that that he came ??? thus reason out the logic. ??? for this a person If it was ??? he or No. Come and learn from this. The rabbis taught: ??? for me ??? It is not ??? in order ??? for me ??? a Tanna taught: Abba to make you acknowledge The strength that at the beginning of the teaching a Tanna taught: your father to make you acknowledge The strength ??? for me ??? It is not ??? in order ??? for me ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard Abba and your father there i.e., in another mishna he and so when he said in order ??? for me are they, ??? for me ??? but: so-and-so No. and if we had heard so-and-so Here in this case, he and so when he said ??? No. are they, ??? that is not ??? for him as a gift but: Abba and your father ??? I would say as a gift ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements The Rabbis taught ??? for me ??? atop a sela coin It is not ??? and if he was a sela coin of it ??? he is required Rav Bibi a sela coin of both What then? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. ??? for me ??? It is not ??? and if he was ??? of it ??? he is required Rav ??? ran ??? What then? ??? benefit that he came ??? of him ??? for him ??? or, perhaps, ??? he said for him according to Torah law, ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. ??? for me ??? It is not ??? even Responded ??? He ascended What is the reason? he said for him so that thus it will be ??? of him. I thus ??? of him. There was this guy that he was ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.