It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

??? this particular ??? he said for him Give for me one ??? he said to it If it was ??? for me he said for him ??? Rav said Chama all ??? Is this not anything he There was this guy that he was two wine; ??? this particular ??? he said for him Give for me one a cup he said to it If it was ??? for me he said for him ??? Rav said Chama all ??? Is this not anything he There was this guy that he was my field dates ??? this particular ??? He said to him my field for me both he said to it If it was ??? for me he said for him my field ??? Rav said ??? all my field ??? Is this not anything he They posed this difficulty: Give ??? and my field What then? Ravina said ??? Rav ??? son of ??? he said ??? It is not ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion It is not ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? No. It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Rav said ??? The Rabbis taught with a contract How so? the writing of to him on ??? or on ??? despite the fact in which is not the value of ??? for me ??? for me ??? for me ??? Behold! This is ??? He disagreed with this R' Zeira son of ??? this one No. he is equivalent. This ??? there i.e., in another mishna sell written to him my field ??? to you Here in this case, the master of written ??? for me Rabba said: there i.e., in another mishna ??? and here in this other case, ??? there it is written (Lev. 25) ??? the Merciful One Here in this case, it is written (Deut. 22) For ??? the Merciful One there i.e., in another mishna also it is written (Jer. 32) "Fields are acquired by means of money" a seminal emission of him. ??? What is the reason? ??? of him. ??? It is because of this: As it is written ??? So, here, a seminal emission of him. For ??? As it is written (Deut. 22) houses I have given ??? except Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? rabbis ??? And if you wish, I would say there i.e., in another mishna also it is written (Jer. 32) ??? ??? Rabba said: Rav Nachman said the writing of to him on ??? or on ??? despite the fact in which is not the value of ??? for me ??? for me ??? for me ??? between by way of lit., through the hands of ??? between by way of lit., through the hands of herself ??? This is only in the case that did not have ??? the writing of to it on ??? or on ??? despite the fact in which is not the value of ??? Behold! ??? for me Behold! for me ??? Behold! ??? for me ??? between by way of lit., through the hands of ??? between by way of lit., through the hands of herself ??? This is only in the case ??? he is required R' Shimon son of ??? a legal document betrothal ??? that did not have ??? What then? ??? Just as

דף ט,ב גמרא

??? in the case of ??? Even ??? in the case of ??? or, perhaps, ??? Just as ??? No. in the case of ??? Even ??? No. in the case of ??? according to ??? he returns ??? For scripture said: (Deut. 24) ??? it was said: ??? or in the case that one is not ??? Raba and Ravina They said: ??? Rav ??? Rav ??? They said: It is not ??? Rav Pappa said: I would say The reason is ??? and so go ahead and say The reason is ??? I would say The reason is ??? As it is written ??? it was There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? or in the case that one is not ??? Even ??? also ??? or in the case that one is not ??? and so go ahead and say The reason is ??? it was There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? in the case of the understanding of ??? Even ??? in the case of the understanding of ??? They challenged him from this teaching: yes. ??? contracts of betrothal ??? except ??? Is this not contracts of betrothal ??? actually and really No. contracts of ??? and like Rav Gidal. Rav said For Rav Gidal said that Rav said how much you he gives ??? thus in the same way thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way thus in the same way they stand and His holiness ??? there are. there are. the things ??? What is our source for this claim he said R' Abahu that R' Yochanan said For scripture said: (Deut. 22) ??? the master of This teaches that it was made to it the master of by way of lit., through the hands of ??? He said to him R' Zeira to R' ??? And there are those who say it was Reish Lakish: to Rabbi Yochanan ??? -- this refers to ??? Rabbi (Deut. 24) ??? This teaches ??? If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: until ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Come and learn from this. He disagreed with this R' Abba -- son of ??? If so, ??? for he said: the Merciful One by stoning, in what way does It concerns itself If it was ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? the case is that of an elevation-offering, She If it was ??? and not ??? Is this not anything he ??? rabbis in front ??? It concerns itself For example, upon it came ??? that did not have ??? He said to him Abaye Up to this point, does not disagree Rabbi And the rabbbis except ??? but: the master of the words of all are if came upon it that did not have ??? it was made the case is that of an elevation-offering, Who is it as it is taught: ??? upon it ??? men ??? She a virgin all of them by stoning, Rabbi says says I ??? by stoning, and all of them ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said It concerns itself For example, ??? with a contract Because he completes and sends forth he completes he brings in and R' Yochanan This ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This certain individual should bring himself -- this refers to ??? And there is no meaning to the word A Hebrew female slave ??? I thought to say ??? for just as ??? that do not ??? By means of money ??? -- this refers to ??? By means of money is it not logical ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? and is standing ??? I thought to say Because "and the writing of (Ex. 21) if ??? to him ??? the scripture ??? Just as ??? Even A Hebrew female slave ??? Come and learn from this. And Rabbi This reason out the logic. ??? for him If so, let the Merciful One write in the Torah and the master of What then does it mean when it says ??? Learn from this both and to Raba for he said: son of ??? for me (Deut. 24) "When a man takes a woman" ??? are they, ??? that do not ??? No. are they, ??? What is there to say? If so, ??? he read or ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Learn from this all of them And Rabbi This ??? the master of What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This should bring himself the master of makes it the case is that of an elevation-offering, that did not have ??? And there is no meaning to the word after makes it the case is that of an elevation-offering, that did not have ??? and who it has to Rabbi This reason out the logic. For it was taught: ??? upon it ??? men ??? She a virgin all of them by stoning, Rabbi says says I ??? by stoning, and all of them ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.