It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קד,א גמרא

immediately ??? himself except Rabba said: that I ??? for one ??? for him immediately where it is possible ??? it was. for him like who for he said: for him ??? for me into your hand Therefore, "even though has sworn for he says for him ??? for me into your hand immediately who seeks atonement No. ??? until ??? this one No. ??? you shall ??? until ??? They do not give it No. for his son and not ??? it was said: ??? Rav Chisda he said you shall ??? Rava said: shall not be ??? Rav Chisda he said you shall ??? and he raised him. ??? Rava said: shall not be ??? This is what he means: ??? he If it was ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning If it was ??? in his hands ??? in his hands We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? ??? in the hand of his son in the hand of his male slave in the hand of ??? or in the hand of his son in the hand of his male slave in the hand of ??? of he asks ??? is exempt This ??? How so? If it was that is not One who acts ??? except ??? And we have learned this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper It is a difficulty for Rav Chisda's position. Like that which was said by Rav Chisda ??? Here in this case, also, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: They do not give it No. for his son and not ??? This ??? How so? If it was that is not he made for him ??? except Is this not ??? Rav Chisda ??? but: ??? What about in this case, too, that there is ??? at the end of the teaching, but: he gives he ??? a court ??? ??? ??? Here, too, that there is ??? They said: he the Tanna does not distinguish. ??? a court בית דין there is no difference he made for him ??? and there is no difference he made for him a thief you shall ??? he the Tanna does distinguish. ??? and so when he made for him ??? he that there is ??? he made for him a thief shall not be ??? he the Tanna does not distinguish. and To exclude ??? a Tanna taught: as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says ??? a court ??? and not he made for him a thief or he made for him a thief ??? and he took are his ??? is exempt Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Eliezer who both say ??? you shall ??? to him ??? for he said: for him ??? for me ??? regarding ??? and not ??? them ??? for him Perhaps ??? he that is not ??? for him ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said

דף קד,ב גמרא

yes. ??? coins ??? and even witnesses ??? upon it And Rabbi Yochanan said: if witnesses ??? upon it ??? They said: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? This is like Rabbi Abba you shall ??? Joseph son of Chama He said to him for Rav, ??? For He went to that place He said to him: Raba the son of who the writing of to you ??? He said to him No. If so, ??? to you ??? He said to him: If it was the writing of to you also ??? Is this not anything he Perhaps ??? Rabbi Abba ??? in the presence of ??? Rabbi Abba Is this not anything he He said to him and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you ??? the land and come It is written to us ??? This is like of Rav ??? it was. ??? among ??? for Rav, Shmuel son of Abba ??? For he came ??? until ??? he gave to him ??? Perhaps, Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? he and if ??? for him ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: also he gave ??? and "on has sworn ??? Behold! ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth on Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Perhaps, ??? he Another teaching is like this: ??? his fellow and "to him has sworn did he die ??? the principal amount plus a fifth and are exempt from ??? My son, ??? are they, ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? he he is required ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? I says when does the previous statement apply? he does not must make restitution Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth on ??? his father at a time i.e., in a case that did not have "No. has sworn he and not his father he and not his father his father and not he he his father from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 5) who ??? and what ??? This is only in the case No. ??? and not ??? Rav Nachman said There is no difficulty. here, who gave thanksgiving here, that did not have ??? If it was No. ??? the principal amount also No. must make restitution And if you say Here, too, that is not must make restitution Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he turned ??? This comes to imply ??? must make restitution And furthermore, It was taught: ??? I says when does the previous statement apply? he must make restitution the principal amount on ??? his father at a time i.e., in a case ??? he his father his father and not he he and not his father No. he and not his father from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? a lost item ??? there are ??? Rav Huna and he said about this teaching ??? He said to him Rabbah the son of there are ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Master, or ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Master, He said to him there are ??? They said: Rather, what can we conclude? No. ??? No. ??? his father ??? his son ??? his son Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? that are his They said: ??? standing If it was ??? standing even the principal amount also No. must make restitution it is not necessary to teach this That there are liens on And so that it is possible liens on items of movable property What then does it mean when it says you shall ??? on "Here is She ??? on "Here is he does not ??? No. from ??? and not from ??? They said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.