It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קה,א גמרא

??? In justice, If it was ??? In justice, even Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth also must make restitution Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua on account of that do not ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth on ??? Rava said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? of his father ??? in the hand of others the principal amount must make restitution for it is the case that ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth No. must make restitution and so when ??? for it is the case that It was not ??? except ??? the value of ??? Rav Pappa said: They did not teach such a ruling except that do not ??? standing but: ??? standing It is necessary for him to walk after him: there is a fear of them. lest ??? that it is possible that they said Rav Pappa said: there is no difference ??? standing and there is no difference that do not ??? standing it is not necessary for him to walk after him: ??? No. there is a fear of them. Rabba said: ??? three ??? and they stand on two if ??? to him two he is liable to turn to him ??? and it was taught ??? chametz and he crossed upon it the Paschal offering says to him Behold! ??? before you The reason is ??? this one ??? even though ??? Is this not ??? immediately originally ??? he he is required ??? Here in this case, also, Even though it will be ??? No. the value of ??? originally you shall the value of ??? he is required ??? he is required Raba ??? two ??? to him One from them What then? who say now there is not in this case. ??? or, perhaps, this one No. he returns ??? he returns ??? yes. here, ??? yes. here, If it was ??? yes. here, ??? there are here, thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: even though ??? yes. here, the commandments ??? yes. here, Rabba said: Behold! And they said a Nazir ??? two ??? he did not do anything at all. he is required Raba ??? One ??? One What then? He said to him: Rav Acha ??? a Nazir ??? One One ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? for him to Raba He said to him: it is not necessary to teach this For example, ??? One from them ??? One who say now Regardless, Watch out for leading vav And that is absent here the measure or, perhaps, this one Is this not ??? he originally this one ??? two ??? and now For ??? shall not be two ??? he returns ??? the gate yes. here, ??? yes. here, If it was the gate yes. here, ??? there are here, thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: despite the fact ??? yes. here, the commandments ??? yes. here, Rabba said: Behold! And they said ??? he is required Raba ??? half of it What then? He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Is this not ??? She -- this refers to For it was taught in a baraita ??? until ??? there were in that place two until ??? from ??? or whether ??? The reason is ??? this one No. ??? No. why is it that ??? For ??? half of it They said: thus now there i.e., in another mishna If it was No. ??? No. he arises ??? half of it ??? and it was standing he arises Rabba said: Behold! And they said ??? chametz and he crossed upon it the Paschal offering says to him Behold! ??? before you he is required Raba

דף קה,ב גמרא

"upon it has sworn What then? who say immediately For if it was ??? he is required ??? for him ??? for him or, perhaps, now Regardless, this one he would place ??? in reality he and not ??? for him ??? the validity ??? for him to Raba This is obvious to him. ??? for he said: Rabbah ??? and he says No. ??? What is its properties lit, its goodness ??? although we don't deserve it. I upon it he is liable for behold! he exempted himself ??? a lost item ??? the reward for I upon it he is liable for behold! he exempted himself ??? he asks I upon it he is liable for behold! he exempted himself ??? work Perhaps, even though for it is the case that ??? immediately For if it was ??? now also ??? Here in this case, also, Even though it will be ??? in reality he immediately For if it was ??? he is required ??? for him ??? now also ??? for him ??? Raba and he said about this teaching ??? Rav ??? to Raba (Lev. 5) ??? of it creates an exclusion ??? How so? ??? and he says No. ??? What is its properties lit, its goodness ??? you ??? for me you ??? for me as a gift your father ??? for me your father were given for me as a gift after ??? ran upon it. came ??? on the way ??? although we don't deserve it. I upon it ??? the reward for I upon it he asks I upon it and "??? has sworn It is possible ??? he is liable Therefore, scripture states: ??? of it creates an exclusion ??? He said to him ??? For this teaching for he says for him ??? For ??? you ??? for me What then does it mean when it says give thanks ??? that it is possible it is not necessary to teach this ??? No. I have given to you he is equivalent. ??? you ??? for me your father were given for me What then does it mean when it says give thanks ??? that it is possible for he said: for him in order ??? to you ??? and not my slave to you ??? on the way ??? Let us say, It was necessary to you ??? for me he said The father of Shmuel in the case of one who says ??? a lost item ??? and not I was know that it ??? to you It was taught: he said ben Azzai three oaths there are. ??? of it and not ??? and not of it No. of it and not ??? No. of it and not ??? I would say of it ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Rav Ami he said Rabbi ??? And Shmuel said ??? as it is taught: who satiates a single witness is exempt and Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon he is obligated in what way ??? one master reasons that a thing ??? he is equivalent. and one master reasons that Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Rav Sheshet said ??? was it made? upon it a thief he is liable ??? and it was taught ??? of it we have learned ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 19) No. ??? Is this not ??? money or property No. ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching that is not ??? it is taught at the end and "on has sworn that is false we have learned ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: No. ??? But the beginning of the teaching, that is not ??? They said: This and this ??? here, who gave thanksgiving here, ??? witnesses they came witnesses he is liable ??? he is liable ??? plus a fifth ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? on ??? How so? one ??? and one ??? and even ??? without worth and if ??? he ??? for him They said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? and it was standing ??? he ??? for him ??? for him Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin ??? is valid ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.