It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קו,א גמרא

??? is invalid, ??? Didn't Ilfa say: ??? he acquires ??? She ??? but: ??? No. ??? Here in this case, also, ??? And if you wish, I would say What then does it mean when it says ??? he acquires Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? For Rav Huna said: Rav said a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? and "and after this has sworn ??? witnesses is exempt as it is said (Ex. 22) ??? and not ??? immediately ??? for the remainder yes. must make restitution money or property Back to the main body of the text: Rav Huna said Rav said a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? anything and "??? has sworn witnesses is exempt as it is said ??? and not ??? immediately ??? for the remainder yes. ??? money or property Rabba said: ??? of Rav ??? but: ??? he arises and God Rav said even ??? and so when it is written he read ??? it is written ??? Rav ??? and he said about this teaching ??? Rav Acha son of ??? for Rav, ??? He said to him ??? I and he said "Amen" and the witnesses ??? that specific that ate must make restitution ??? must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth and a guilt-offering He said to him Rav ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? except to the court bet din He said to him If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? He said to him: ??? I and he said "Amen" and the witnesses ??? that specific ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth and a guilt-offering and if You might have thought except to the court bet din who that it is possible ??? He said to him ??? to you But the beginning of the teaching, except to the court and at the end of the teaching, in the house of judgement ??? No. ??? to you This and this in the house of judgement And there is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? He said to him pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama for Rav, ??? of Rav No. ??? to you ??? your soul ??? What is your purpose regarding He said to him: ??? of Rav thus ??? to it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav he read he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: They said: he read for all ??? and not ??? he who has arrived ??? and not ??? who ??? to make whole he "He challenged this "He" meaning... has sworn av Hamnunah ??? upon it five occasions between before a court בית דין or whether that did not have before a court ??? upon it he is liable on all One and one and he said R' Shimon What is the reason? Because It is possible ??? and to give thanks and here in this other case, ??? No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? upon it The tanna teaches: except to the court bet din No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? before a court בית דין The tanna teaches: he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it to the side The tanna teaches: ??? upon it except to the court ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba the master of the house ??? claims ??? and "??? has sworn witnesses if before it was even the case that ??? witnesses ??? must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth and a guilt-offering and if ??? witnesses ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? and a guilt-offering and here in this other case, except to the court bet din ??? No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? The tanna teaches: except Rabba said: all ??? there is no difference ??? claims ??? and there is no difference ??? claims ??? did not say Rav for it is the case that it is written and The thangkgiving-offering who seeks ??? the principal amount plus a fifth ??? claims ??? witnesses also did not say Rav for it is the case that it is written restitutions for ??? and thus he comes to say For example, ??? claims ??? and "and not has sworn ??? witnesses He went Rav ??? and he said ??? in front of Rav ??? He said to him: now for just as av Hamnunah ??? of Rav know for he said: Rav ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? did not say Rav said: for him Rav Acha elder to Rav Ashi av Hamnunah thus ??? has a problem

דף קו,ב גמרא

If you say, This is satisfactory "For has sworn they came witnesses ??? for him sacrifice ??? the final one -- Because It is possible ??? and to give thanks except If you say, For they came witnesses is exempt who that it is possible something For this will come ??? of him. is exempt and We ??? sacrifice ??? Because It is possible ??? and to give thanks now Regardless, No. ??? he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said ??? claims ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five Because ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? claims ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? Just as ??? that he was must make restitution ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five Even ??? claims ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five Just as ??? which provides must make restitution restitutions for ??? that did not have ??? shall you say ??? claims ??? that do not must make restitution restitutions for ??? except ??? They said: ??? She and We do not answer on ??? This is satistfactory ??? one ??? and one ??? claims ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? This if he shall find ??? and if No. he shall find both of them. ??? claims ??? What is there to say? They said: ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba to R' Yochanan ??? I and he said "Amen" and the witnesses ??? that specific that ate must make restitution restitutions for ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, For if it was ??? meat without ??? And we have learned must make restitution restitutions for ??? restitutions for ??? yes. restitutions for four And Hashem No. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that ate roadkill ??? for him For example, that ate ??? like Rabbi Meir for he said: ??? that is not ??? her name ??? for him ??? like Rabbi Meir for he said: son of ??? required ??? for him For example, ??? In justice, and They said to him: "Go!" give to him For thus said Raba "Go!" give to him ??? is exempt What is the reason? immediately ??? you shall a thief and a thief No. must make restitution restitutions for four and five he is liable you to give to him ??? he is liable What is the reason? all how much that is not he the Tanna does distinguish. the validity ??? he They said: ??? for him ??? that did not have ??? his fellow except one ??? three ??? and he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said ??? claims ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? What is the reason? As it is written (Ex. 22) on all it was lost misplaced who it is said ??? Rabbi Abba son of ??? to Rabbi Chiyya son of Abba (Ex. 22) For He shall give" a man yes. ??? a child anything And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? a child ??? a child were given ??? a child ??? The greatness from where do we learn Scripture states: (Ex. 22) until God ??? a thing both until that it should be ??? they agree ??? and if ??? also ??? He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that ate ??? a child but: ??? The greatness What about in this case, too, ??? If so, ??? until that it should be ??? they agree ??? Let the Tanna teach: until that it should be food ??? they agree ??? He said to him It was taught by until that it should be food ??? they agree ??? Rav Ashi said: No. he is equivalent. a lost item ??? We come to compare ??? son of the understanding of Hey, isn't it the case that No. We come to compare ??? son of the understanding of and he said R' Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said ??? claims ??? he is not liable until ??? in part ??? in part What is the reason? For scripture said: (Ex. 22) For is this and disagrees For R' Chiyya son of Joseph for he said: R' Chiyya son of Joseph

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.