It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קז,א גמרא

??? It is written here, And so it is written (Ex. 22) For is this ??? it is written: and what is the difference here, ??? for he said: Rabbah On account of what he said Torah give thanks in part ??? shall vow ??? yes. a person ??? his face before the master of ??? and that one ??? he is required ??? and that one that is not ??? It is because of this: ??? a person ??? his face ??? he is required ??? for him and that one ??? for him in part reasoned If it was ??? for him ??? for me ??? for me from this now ??? for me ??? Therefore, ??? the Merciful One ??? so that thus it will be ??? for him ??? and regarding ??? he That there are to say thus but: regarding ??? It was taught by pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama four ???

דף קז,ב גמרא

they all require ??? in part and thanks in part and they are ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? Rabba said: What is the reason? ??? son of Chama ??? although we don't deserve it. clearly and explicitly it is written of him. (Ex. 22) For is this ??? the reward for he learns it ??? although we don't deserve it. he asks And so ??? on one topic ??? If it was ??? the reward for we were ??? the reward for If it was ??? although we don't deserve it. we were ??? although we don't deserve it. and said Rabbi Chiyya son of Joseph ??? claims ??? he is not liable until ??? in it a hand What is the reason? (Ex. 22) ??? the master of the house to God if No. ??? his neighbor from this general principle it would follow For if it was ??? of it a hand ??? This comes to imply ??? of it a hand is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) He said to them R' Chiyya bar Abba thus that R' Yochanan said ??? on ??? He said to him R' Zeira to R' Chiyya son of Abba ??? on ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: but: ??? of it a hand he bought ??? does not take effect of him. anything or, perhaps, Even if is standing on ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: He said to him -- this refers to No. I hear ??? of it I hear for thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? claims ??? and "and he returned has sworn ??? claims ??? and "??? has sworn witnesses is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? the first He said to him No. Because and went out the hands of ??? the first it was said: also Thus said Rabbi Avin: Thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? claims a lost item ??? and "and he returned has sworn ??? claims ??? and "??? has sworn witnesses is exempt Because and went out the hands of ??? the first Rav Sheshet said ??? claims ??? immediately ??? in it a hand is exempt What is the reason? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One ??? the master of the house to God if No. ??? etc. this one ??? is exempt He said to him: Rav ??? Is it not the case that three oaths ??? that specific ??? that did not have ??? of it ??? that did not have ??? of it a hand ??? that is not ??? Is this not ??? that did not have ??? of it a hand is equivalent ??? that is not ??? Just as ??? that is not ??? For ??? the validity ??? he is liable Even ??? that did not have ??? of it a hand For ??? the validity ??? of it a hand he is liable He said to him: No. ??? that did not have ??? of it a hand is equivalent ??? of it Just as ??? that did not have ??? of it For ??? the validity ??? of it is exempt ??? Even ??? that did not have ??? of it a hand For ??? the validity ??? of it a hand is exempt ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama money or property ??? from ??? or, perhaps, ??? from ??? How so? For example, ??? claims ??? and "and he returned has sworn ??? claims ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.